Anatomy of a Photo: Greg LeMan
Is it the shades?
The W.C. Jersey?
The Z kit?
The d.t. shifters?
Talk amongst yourselves. I just had to get a pic up that’s worthy of this site. Thank me now.
Is it the shades?
The W.C. Jersey?
The Z kit?
The d.t. shifters?
Talk amongst yourselves. I just had to get a pic up that’s worthy of this site. Thank me now.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
@Marko
++1
@Oli Brooke-White
I think you may have a point, mate.
@Jarvis
@Marcus
LeMond = Awesome and has a more impressive, well-rounded track record. Turning the Tour into a pharmalogical study does not make you a better rider. LeMond started from basically zero and revolutionized the sport. The only dark spot is the unfortunate fact that he started the “Tour Specialization” fad.
Exactly! He has the stripes, but he isn’t overdoing it. Hell, now they’ll put a yellow computer on their bike to match the jersey, plus yellow shades, bike, everything. Leman is sharp & classy.
And he’s using a violet colored computer as well, not a green, polka dot or yellow.
Class.
Question: can we identify the original dawning of the Rainbow Turd? To a rider? To a specific race day?
@Steampunk @Cyclops A++1
@Ron
blame Cipo (if you dare!) for instigating matching knicks which led onto the rainbow turd being worn by others first, but none better than him.
@frank
At the risk of perpetuating this unwinnable argument, 1 World Champs, 7 Tours, two Classics (Fleche and San Sebastian? plus a lot of high placings in others), plus plenty of Dauphines, etc., beats LeMelvis’ 2 World Champs, 3 Tours and an admittedly more rounded (but hardly world beating) Classics palmares.
The drugs stuff for Armstrong is unproven (but possibly likely) – at this stage we know there are suspicions and the fact that almost everyone he beat really was a pharmacological experiment. As for LeMond, he wasn’t exactly racing against, and beating, cleanskins. But no way he was a doper right? Because he says so and seems nice? That line worked for Tyler for a while too. LeMond’s era was around about the time when the US track cycling team was (legally) blood doping, so who knows what was going on?
@Marcus
@frank
@Jarvis
So anyways, back to that awesome photo…
@frank
You mean Crocodile Dundee picked one up after he saw your father.
@Steampunk
Besides, Frank’s dad didn’t use a Bowie knife for that fine pelt. He ran the beast down and slayed it with his reading glasses. He used the knife to tailor the vest–for That Perfect Look.
Oh, and the zebra skin? That’s no ordinary white zebra with black stripes. That’s the far more rare black zebra with white stripes. Discerning fellow. I can see where Frank gets his eye for details.
@Cyclops
Fuck, yeah. That’s how you climb.
Back to the photo:
Despite all my years following procycling, I have never seen that photo before.
I bought Drop-ins, or at least Specialized’s version of them. I bought Oakley Razor Blades and a Giro Air Attack because of Lemond in ’89. I even “dream built” a bike with the “Z” colour scheme – I think 50% of bikes sold in the UK back then were sold with that or a similar paintjob.
There is also something to be said about him not having a helmet on that brings a “carefree” feeling to the photo. But for all that I wouldn’t have the rules any other way and I would never ride without a helmet.
And to digress again briefly, I have avoided Oakley for 10 years, will never buy a Trek and am unlikely to ever buy any Giro product again all because of CotHO. I was a diehard Oakley and Giro fan before he came along.
@Marcus
US blood doping happened at a time when Lemond was a European Pro. So no involvement in that. But I’ll still contend that Armstrong didn’t have much opposition. There was only ever Ullrich who was interested in winning through those years.
If you mean The Rules as opposed to just rules in general, I don’t believe they prescribe helmet wearing.
Benotto cello tape. My heart strings are quivering. Yet I’m positively appalled at the price of it now. I am clearly old. And way too fat to climb.
Wonderful shot of LeMan. Now if I could just find all my old Winning magazines.
Where can I get me some of them bidons.
@Adam
I just threw out a similar Pepsi one that came with a beater frame I bought last week.
@Adam
You can’t get them anymore; I used to only ride with Coke bottles, no exceptions. They were magnificent and looked oh so PRO. My last set still lives, but I’m trying not to loose them. In fact, I’m planning a Deference article on them. That and my green PMU hand.
A quick search has found this; http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NEW-COCA-COLA-WATER-BOTTLE-11-TALL-/120659226069?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1c17d9add5#ht_500wt_949
But it’s just not the same.
@Adam
Added to my Watch List, thx!… I foretell a Velominati bidding war in a couple weeks…
@ChrisO
No, I meant the rules
@frank
your green PMU hand wasn’t the one that nearly decapitated Thor was it? You have a bad track record in maiming PRO cyclists
awesome !! :-)
I’m such a wanker.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/24439014@N05/5272576766/
@Oli Brooke-White
Celeste is transcendent.
@Oli Brooke-White, @Jeff in PetroMetro
One word, “Magnifique!!!!!”
Also, that pic makes you the opposite of a wanker, it makes you a Velominatus.
Chur!
The z-kit, it brings out his quads;)
So, I finally finshed watching the 2005 Paris-Roubaix DVD, the new Lombardia DVD that arrived with my renewal of Cyclesport and got around to watching the 1990 WCP Tour De France DVD today on my early morning trainer ride.
Great DVD overall. So many parts of the DVD are worth mentioning and discussing in detail, but the original question of when the photo was taken is still not clear in my mind, even after watching the video. But, if I had to make an educated guess, I would bet that it was taken before he had the puncture on the descent after the Marie-Blanque. There is a fleeting shot of him in the DVD prior to the puncture on that stage that looks soooo much like the above photo.
Most interestingly, and a bonus for me riding 100 minutes this morning, is that in the end credits of the DVD there is almost the exact same shot of him riding as above.
I need to write a guest article about the DVD and that race. From Lemond mispronouncing Chiappucci’s name so badly throughout to Lemon’s wry smile as he is asked if he made anyone hurt that day, so many cool sections.
btw, here is a SUPER link on the ’90 tdf, including the original “chaingate” a la Cuntador and Brother Grimpeur the Younger with the puncture on stage 17.
http://www.cyclesportmag.com/features/classic-races-1990-tour-de-france/
@frank
@Jeff in PetroMetro
I agree completely. This is why I love the bike.
Those hoods, while comfortable and substantial to hold onto, especially out of the saddle, were really difficult for me to brake effectively from the hoods position. The springs were overly stiff for my taste, and the bend of the lever was awkwardly low.
@Calmante
Maybe. But I’m sure they were laterally stiff and vertically compliant. No?
What a photo.
Just maybe it’s that the cycle computer matches the ‘Z’ on his kit. So subtle that it almost unnoticeable but, somewhere in your subconscious switches are flicked and triggers released that sends chemicals around your body. These chemicals, switched and triggers leave you with only one conclusion and that is this photo is the embodiment of what it is to ride a bike. The Rules have been distilled and triple filtered through charcoal and poured over ice – this photo is the result.
Is that a Cartier watch? Dang!!!
It’s the smile. Going fast is fun. Greg looks fast and happy! Great pic.
Utterly magnificent!! Chapeau!!
Greg LeMond up next on Anderson Cooper 360 on CNN.
The first thirty-eight minutes were barely tolerable.