I recently overheard someone say that there is no such thing as bad weather, just bad clothing. This is the kind of statement that makes me want to hate people as a species a little bit. Of course there such a thing as bad weather. There are also bad people (loads of them), bad ideas (even bigger loads of them), bad advice (especially on the internet) and, despite what your mother told you, there certainly are stupid questions.
Despite being so clever as to render itself useless, there is a sentiment behind the claim that should be taken seriously, and that is the notion that if one is to venture out in bad weather, one should give some consideration to dressing appropriately for it. For example, I routinely see photos of Spanish Pros riding the trainer indoors in wooly hats and leggings. I would never ride indoors with leggings because the most redeeming quality of riding indoors is that you get to stare at your guns shamelessly without worry of being spotted doing so.
A Velominatus should take care to ensure they have a complete wardrobe of kit for different kinds of weather; bibs and jerseys, of course, but also arm and knee warmers, gilets, long sleeve jerseys, overshoes, gloves, caps, winter caps, knee warmers and leggings, and even jackets or rain coats depending on where you live and what kind of weather you encounter.
Always remember that the more you’re wearing, the worse you look. That’s not an opinion – that’s science. Perfection starts with bibs and a jersey, tanned guns, and a sweet set of shades. Next in line is the Flandrian Best, but after that, it’s all downhill, ending with the unfortunate invention of thermal bibs. They may be a necessity under some circumstances, just know they look complete crap, so you will too.
Still, its better than not riding, so as you’re getting ready to kit up for the day, I advise you take into account the following considerations.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@Robert
I've had some fairly terrible experiences where I was kitted out with a base layer on top and knee warmers, but just my bibs covering the area in between. Having the area from mid-thigh to your waist be the only part of your anatomy that is freezing is extremely unpleasant sensation.
I used to wear a pair of running tights under my bibs. I am pretty sure that would not fly with the rules, but they were thin enough that it was reasonably comfortable and warm.
I don't know, something about that photo makes him look like a child on a bike that is too big. The helmet? The huge feet and boney legs? Not sure.
@HMBSteve
Never worn base layers. What do you recommend, short sleeve, no sleeve?
I'm with Frank on this one. I generally prefer the sleeveless baselayers to avoid the jersey/BL sleeves not getting along.
I use three baselayers, sometimes paired together depending on the temps.
Warm/cool - Craft baselayer. I have two that are like gauzy mesh and one that is plain ol' mesh. I can't find it in stock anywhere though. Sleeveless. At this point I don't like the feeling of bib straps right on my skin. I go for small, you want it to fit very snugly. I'm 171 cm, 65 kgs, a bit thicker than cyclo-build from lots of other sports.
Cold - Just got the Icebreaker 150 g Merino wool baselayer. It's a wool t-shirt, seems like nothing, but when paired with a Craft zip neck mid layer top, it's very warm, requiring only a LS jersey even down to freezing. I used to opt for a jacket, but this year I like this pairing a lot more.
I really like baselayers. Some think they're just useless crap sold to ya by the industry. I wear mine year-round though and never ride without one. I think many of them are likely very similar, as most of the big sellers now offer them. I say find one of the mesh-y ones on sale somewhere and try that. The summer ones help, even in winter.
It also seems like no one has taken the opportunity to mention the family jewel pouch. I've seen them made for surfers for cold/chaffing protection.
I've had friends say they've doubled up bibs in really cold weather. I can't imagine the double chamois effect.
In really cold weather I'll either pair regular bibs with non-chamois tights. Or, I'll just wear some winter knickers with long wool socks or leg warmers + socks.
If it's cold enough for the nether regions to freeze, normally my feet or hands or face hurts worse.
@Ron
Thanks very much - sounds like a good plan
@GogglesPizano
Certainly that is a good looking kit and helmet (at least from this angle), but I'm amazed at how arched his back is.
The thing I hate the most about Cervelo (besides their tall head tube) is their move to such a high bottom bracket. He looks like he's riding a Penny-farthing.
(That's Alex from of Pavé Cycling Classics fame, by the way.)
@Ron
Bah, you're just jealous of us long-legged, flipper-footed folk.
Ha. I spent most of my life being jealous of you tall lads, but now that I've replaced bahlsportz with cycling, I'm happy being Medium Sized*.
He does look more normal in the full-sized photo, I was looking at the teeny one.
*Gianni confirmed 172 cms is Medium Sized just last week. I've been feelin' good since!
@frank
It is because of the longer head tube he can run a frame two sizes too small and still get his position as low as he wants. I doubt you understand this geometry concept.
That's the same reason J. Van Summeren downsized from 61 to 58. I ride old geometry in size 54 and the new in 51. The idea you have that somehow longer head tube is for people without any flexibility is wrong.
If anybody however is less flexible or require lots of spacers for a bike to fit longer head tube still looks better and improves frame's front end stiffness over a stack of spacers.
@TommyTubolare
I understand perfectly; I understand that on the old geo I have to ride a frame two sizes too small just to get my bars low enough already.
Tall head tubes aren't for inflexible people, tall head tubes generally for recreational cyclists. My beef with the tall head tube is 100% based on the fact that I could never get enough reach out of a 58cm and the new 61cm will never be low enough for me. So it all comes down to myopic heartbreak.
My Veloforma has a 19.5cm ht vs the 22cm ht on the R5ca. Lovies.
@frank
-17 stem would put you probably 16-18 mm lower and 2 mm longer for a 61 R3/R5 comparing to your -10 stem.
Going with 58 R3 and using 140 mm -17 stem would put in the same position or very close. 3T 140 mm measures nearly 150 mm c-c so it's enough. Plus matching 3T stem to rotundo bars. I can see only benefits.
Anyway you're riding it so you know what's best for you. I just think it's more about cervelo vs veloforma rather than what fits and what not.