Everyone knows it’s a great idea to change out pieces of equipment the day before a group ride, especially an honorary Ronde van Vlaanderen Cogal involving steep, cobblestone climbs. There is obviously also no need to test-ride the equipment after making said change.
I remark at this point that it is rather unexpected to find an 11 speed chain inside a box labeled as being 10 speed. I also note that an 11 speed chain is not obviously narrower than its 10 speed counterpart. Once installed, it even seems to operate normally, happily jumping from one cog to the next, up and down the cassette, as you click away at it on the work stand. It gives the strong impression of being a happy chain.
This is a ruse. It is not a happy chain. In fact, it is a borderline malicious chain; it lulls the rider into a false sense of security, right until the moment that enough pressure is applied to the pedals, at which point the chain will rudely skip. The amount of pressure required to make the chain skip is dependent upon in which gear you are riding; some skip easily, some (seemingly) not at all. The ones that seemed like they didn’t skip at all were the two lowest gears. Comforting, knowing the steep cobbled climbs that were to be gobbled up towards the end of the ride, where they would be most instrumental.
As it turns out, the amount of pressure required to skip the chain is the amount applied at roughly 20% and the rider has risen out of the saddle in search of extra power. This came as quite a surprise to me, the rider, and also to those riding behind me, who used words like “ejected” and “like you hit an invisible car” to describe what they saw.
So, I can make with certainty the following observation: a 10 speed chain and 11 speed chain might not have any outward trappings of distinction between them but they are indeed very different. This difference manifests itself by one functioning as expected and the other having the capacity to eject a rider when combined with a 10 speed drivetrain. It all seems very obvious, but that doesn’t make it less true.*
There are many other examples of this I’m sure; I remember having quite a job of properly connecting my Cinelli stem to my Scott Drop-In handlebars because the diameters did not quite match. That one also resulted in some high speed handling anomalies.
There are two morals to this story. First, it matters whether your equipment is interoperable. Second, if you make a change to your gear before a big ride, for the love of Merckx, take it on a test drive.
*As it turns out, it does in fact make it less true; this should function flawlessly but it was a worn(ish) cassette that held the secret to the bikes newly discovered ejection function.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
Unfortunately the entire premise of this article is flawed; there is absolutely no issue with using an 11sp chain on a 10sp drivetrain whatsoever.
If the chain skipped under load it's because a cog/some cogs are worn enough that they won't mesh with a new chain, or perhaps the 11sp chain mysteriously in the 10sp box is actually a discarded worn chain.
And I previously thought tuning (or, as I found out, untuning) my front derailleur the night before a ride and then not testing it was bad. That involved quite a bit of climbing the next morning without any ability to access the little ring. Only through meditation on Rule #90 did I find true salvation through my suffering.
That said, I stopped by my LBS on the way home and they did exactly five seconds of witchcraft and it was absolutely perfect and silent again.
Well done, Frank.
As long as you weren't injured, I might say that witnessing this would have made the (second of the weekend) six-hour round-trip on Sunday well worth it.
@Oli
Well that's disappointing.
I will, however push back to say the premise of the story is "don't be a dumbass and change your gear out the day before a ride and if you are that dumb, at least be smart enough to test it." The chain was just the anecdote to bring the point home.
@frank
That of course is sound advice, but widely publicised misinformation about chain compatibility certainly isn't helpful.
Also, it's "ruse" not rouse.
To clarify, using a chain wider than specified isn't good - i.e. using a 10sp chain on an 11sp drivetrain - but using a narrower chain (11sp chain on 10sp cogs, 10sp on 9sp, etc., etc.) isn't a problem.
@Oli
@Oli
@Oli
Jesus Oli, who took a dump in your coffee???
(insert smiley-face emoticon here, Mate)
@Buck Rogers
I know, right?
@frank
I'm impressed you found a photo that almost exactly matches what I witnessed when your chain and cogs decided hit the eject button. Its one thing to ride up worn cobbles after over 100km, but going further to get an up close inspection and taste test, that's what Hardmen are made of. Glad the only injury was to your pride. Great ride. Thanks.