I must admit to not having read most of the cycling memoirs in the Works. I may eventually but the local public library doesn’t carry any of them and never will so I’ll have to buy them or ask Frank to tote everything he has to Hawaii. I did get off my wallet and buy these two and it was money well spent. David Millar and Tyler Hamilton have produced two excellent cycling books, parallel stories in very general terms and times. The contrast of how two people in similar straits handle the truth and the divergent roads it puts them on is compelling.
Doping in professional cycling is still secretive enough that it is best told from someone all the way on the inside. Journalists will be lied to by cyclists. Federal grand juries do better at getting the truth but we usually don’t hear it. Cyclists who lived the lie and need to unburden themselves make a good conduit. I can’t begin to explain it as well as Tyler or David did; their inner world of professional cycling is nothing we hear much about. In the 1990s it was the wild west where the law was absent. Spanish “doctors”, syringes and mini-centrifuges ruled the day. It’s such a huge subject, too interwoven with passion and pressure, so much grey area. For a person like me who likes to talk about doping in black and white, I’ve learned how institutionalized and insidious it was (past tense, I hope). It’s not so simple. It’s tragic. To feed the young ambitious athlete into a system where there is no choice but to accept the drug system is criminal. When money is at stake and the UCI is complicit, as is team management, those are some criminals.
Racing Through the Dark-by David Millar. I’ll also admit to being a long time admirer of David Millar. He has always been well- spoken and not afraid to confront, two qualities I admire and personally lack, but they make a good writer. Millar is a military brat who found his cycling talent in the 10 mile British time trial club races. He ended up living his dream, riding on the Cofidis team, France’s well- funded but dysfunctional squad. He spent his first few years with Cofidis riding clean, yet watching how others “prepared”.
“In my youthful exuberance, I was telling anybody who would listen that I’d won in De Panne and broken the course record with a hematocrit of only 40 percent. I went to see Casagrande and his roommate, whom I refer to as L’Équipier (the teammate), so that I could show Casagrande the test results.
I stood there, a big grin on my face, expecting Casagrande to congratulate me and say something morale boosting. But he didn’t. After a pause, he handed the results back to me and then turned to speak to his roommate in Italian.
“Perché non é a cinquate?” Casagrande asked L’Équipier, puzzled, Why isn’t he at fifty?
No one talked about doping and no one talked about not doping. Eventually, after VDB self-destructed and Casagrande was busted, Millar became a team leader. And with that mantle came the responsibility to produce results, be a professional. And eventually he was implicated by a teammate, evidence was found, he was out of cycling, deeply in debt, and drinking his way to the bottom.
For some interesting video here is a recent Spanish documentary from the inner ring.
The Secret Race-by Tyler Hamilton and Daniel Coyle. Tyler Hamilton and I grew up in the same end of Massachusetts, he went to the same prep school @rob and I dropped out of, so I always felt slightly connected to him. So I was a fan boy and stood by his fantastic excuses for too long.
The whole wretched story of doping in cycling is right here. Tyler Hamilton cheated and lied for so long, it took until 2011 before he could tell his parents the truth. And despite his decade of lying, this book rings true. His reward was getting out from under the lie. I think he would have written the book for free just for the unburdening. He states many times the lightness of being after testimony and though he knows it’s very unlikely, hopes Lance can feel the same lightness that comes from telling the truth. This book is Tyler Hamilton’s story but it is closely linked to part of the Armstrong saga.
Like Millar, Hamilton was unaware of systemic drug use until he had joined the professional ranks. US Postal drugs were at first team- provided and paid for. Once you proved yourself as one of the best riders on the team, as someone who could help Lance win the Tour, you earned the right to use EPO. It is fascinating reading, it’s horrifying, it’s depressing. Most unsettling is Lance Armstrong’s behavior. There are many revelations regarding Armstrong’s psychotic need to win. I’ll share just this one.
Tyler was eased out of US Postal because he was too strong a rider and perceived as a threat to Armstrong. So Tyler left and signed with Phonak in 2004. There was a time trial up Mont Ventoux in the 2004 Dauphiné Libéré weeks before the Tour de France. Tyler beat Lance in the TT. Later during the Tour, Floyd Landis, who was still riding for US Postal rode along side Tyler.
“You need to know something”
I pulled in closer. Floyd’s Mennonite conscience was bothering him.
“Lance called the UCI on you,” he said. “He called Hien, after Ventoux. Said you guys and Mayo were on some new shit, told Hien to get on you. He knew they’d call call you in. He’s been talking shit nonstop. And I think it’s right that you know.”
This little story is amazing for many different reasons and the only good one is Floyd Landis telling it to Tyler. I’m guilty of saying some negative things about Floyd, mostly because he was such an idiot liar. But at a point, when he has nothing to gain and he has lost everything else and he starts telling the truth, he gains back my respect, just like Tyler Hamilton has.
I ended up reading these books one right after the other. As I said before, I recommend them both. David Millar is a better writer. He actually has more demons to battle than Hamilton so his story of redemption is inspiring. Tyler Hamilton’s story is more depraved (in a doping sense) but both books are important. A lot of people in cycling are now admitting to past deeds in very unspecific terms. These two authors are both shining lights into some dark corners and making the inevitability of drug use in cycling more human and understandable. Also, in reading these books back to back, it highlights the contrast in how these two people dealt with their fates.
Both had the bad luck to be nearly singled out as dopers when a large percent of the riders were dopers. Millar realized it was the doping that killed his passion for even riding a bike. He took no joy in his EPO-assisted victories, only a temporary satisfaction that the task at hand was completed. He decided to come clean and to become an advocate for clean racing and changing the corrupt system.
Hamilton could not admit to anyone but his wife (who already knew) that he had been a cheat. His lie was so crushing he couldn’t even see a way out. He then spent all his money and energy protecting the lie for years, for nothing, obviously. It was the threat of perjury in that finally broke open the dam. It’s a cruel lesson to learn; the truth will set you free, even if it takes forever.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@Marcus if not cheating itself, it was definitely one of the earliest instances of the Piti Principle in use.
Thank what ever god you're into these days for the Velominati... it's refreshing to read comments and opinions based on sound judgment and common fucking sense!
I wonder how many assets COTHO has been secretly shifting overseas these past few weeks. Can't wait to see the toxic waters get whipped up into a frothy mess around him and his worldly interests. Nike still plans to honor him and his body of accomplishments at a football game in the near future... nice move, Phil.
Interesting interview with Phil Anderson talking about Armstrong. He was clearly a believer - and now isnt...
Contrast that inteview with Wiggins' - to my mind he was very unconvincing - seemed to go with the dopers' language (as defined by the Kimmage doctrine) of "moving forward" and "passing dope tests" etc.. And the silence from the likes of Cadel Evans, is also a little disturbing. Will be interesting to hear his take on things when he surfaces.
If you are a "leader" within pro cycling, I would think your advisers would be telling you to get out there and make a positive statement to distance yourself from the mess. That is of course presuming you weren't a doper. If you were a doper, then you would be keeping schtum. Which means making a positive statement as to your innocence even more important...
And unfortunately, silence seems to be practice of the day. Good to see Jens (after his pissy response to Hamilton's book) come out with the following tweet,
"You ask if i doped?? Ok here is the answer. No i did not dope in the past, i dont do it now and not planing it in the future."
And where does Chris Horner fit into all of this - joined Radioshack late - but he (and that dirty fuck Livingston) seem to be the only US Lance teammates who havent said a word...
@Marcus
Horner is staying schtum. One can infer from that what you have already posited.
I cannot say I am suprised, but I can say I'm disappointed. I thought some of the riders were better than that, but clearly I am wrong.
@Marcus And you are exactly right. If you are/were a doper, you are keeping quiet. However, other than the young dudes in the peleton, there doesn't seem to be a lot of reaction from riders. I guess that tells us what we really need to know.
@niksch
Guys; Chill the fuck out.
It's just happened a day ago.
These guys still are employed as cyclists. There is currently no mechanism for them to be able to come forward and confess without losing their careers and their livlihood. I'm finding all of the speculation a bit distasteful. Yep, there's a pretty good chance that most of the people we're talking about here were involved in doping at some level. The extreme reactions that are being bandied about here certainly don't suggest that they would be any better off coming clean. I can imagine the scenario; "
Wow, I told the truth. Those chaps on Velominati love me now. Ah whoops. Where's my job?"
We can infer that doping was pervasive throughout the entire peleton, facilitated by team infrastructure. It's pointless picking out individuals, I think. It perpetuates the situation where those who are found out are summarily sacrificed. Hardly an environment conducive to moving forward.
There will no doubt be a total shitstorm in the coming months for people like Riis and others like perhaps LL Sanchez where evidence has been uncovered regarding associations with questionable individuals. And the UCI for that matter. That's where any possible reform might take place.
@mouse can you please point out "the extreme reactions that are being bandied about here"?
@mouse Don't fucking tell me to chill the fuck out. I stated my opinion and it happened that I agreed with Marcus. The fact that this only occurred in the press 24-36 hours ago is immaterial. The press quotes of Leipheimer in the WSJ, Hincapie on his web site, and others in the various media outlets are clear to me that this was a coordinated effort between the USADA and all of the riders. I cannot have been something else.
If it's taken me 24 hours to react and have an opinion, it shouldn't take all the honest riders very long to state their stance. Have you read the latest Velo Mag? It's completely anti-doping and they have essays from all the up and coming riders. Granted, they are American riders, but Velo is a Boulder, CO mag.
So, in that vein, maybe there is a mechanism.
@niksch
Right. Hit a nerve there.
I was reacting to your words. That's a pretty far reaching statement you made in the quote above.
@Marcus
I was reacting to your speculations about Horner.
What I'm suggesting is that this kind of speculation is poisonous. You could easily apply it to pretty much anyone in the peleton who was riding during that period. FWIW, you might be entirely right, and I'm not suggesting that you shouldn't voice your opinions, but...