Book Reviews: Racing Through the Dark, The Secret Race

The truth shall set them free.

I must admit to not having read most of the cycling memoirs in the Works. I may eventually but the local public library doesn’t carry any of them and never will so I’ll have to buy them or ask Frank to tote everything he has to Hawaii. I did get off my wallet and buy these two and it was money well spent. David Millar and Tyler Hamilton have produced two excellent cycling books, parallel stories in very general terms and times. The contrast of how two people in similar straits handle the truth and the divergent roads it puts them on is compelling.

Doping in professional cycling is still secretive enough that it is best told from someone all the way on the inside. Journalists will be lied to by cyclists. Federal grand juries do better at getting the truth but we usually don’t hear it. Cyclists who lived the lie and need to unburden themselves make a good conduit. I can’t begin to explain it as well as Tyler or David did; their inner world of professional cycling is nothing we hear much about. In the 1990s it was the wild west where the law was absent. Spanish “doctors”, syringes and mini-centrifuges ruled the day. It’s such a huge subject, too interwoven with passion and pressure, so much grey area. For a person like me who likes to talk about doping in black and white, I’ve learned how institutionalized and insidious it was (past tense, I hope). It’s not so simple. It’s tragic. To feed the young ambitious athlete into a system where there is no choice but to accept the drug system is criminal. When money is at stake and the UCI is complicit, as is team management, those are some criminals.

Racing Through the Dark-by David Millar. I’ll also admit to being a long time admirer of David Millar. He has always been well- spoken and not afraid to confront, two qualities I admire and personally lack, but they make a good writer. Millar is a military brat who found his cycling talent in the 10 mile British time trial club races. He ended up living his dream, riding on the Cofidis team, France’s well- funded but dysfunctional squad. He spent his first few years with Cofidis riding clean, yet watching how others “prepared”.

“In my youthful exuberance, I was telling anybody who would listen that I’d won in De Panne and broken the course record with a hematocrit of only 40 percent. I went to see Casagrande and his roommate, whom I refer to as L’Équipier (the teammate), so that I could show Casagrande the test results.

I stood there, a big grin on my face, expecting Casagrande to congratulate me and say something morale boosting. But he didn’t. After a pause, he handed the results back to me and then turned to speak to his roommate in Italian.

“Perché non é a cinquate?” Casagrande asked L’Équipier, puzzled, Why isn’t he at fifty?

No one talked about doping and no one talked about not doping. Eventually, after VDB self-destructed and Casagrande was busted, Millar became a team leader. And with that mantle came the responsibility to produce results, be a professional. And eventually he was implicated by a teammate, evidence was found, he was out of cycling, deeply in debt, and drinking his way to the bottom.

For some interesting video here is a recent Spanish documentary from the inner ring.

The Secret Race-by Tyler Hamilton and Daniel Coyle. Tyler Hamilton and I grew up in the same end of Massachusetts, he went to the same prep school @rob and I dropped out of, so I always felt slightly connected to him. So I was a fan boy and stood by his fantastic excuses for too long.

The whole wretched story of doping in cycling is right here. Tyler Hamilton cheated and lied for so long, it took until 2011 before he could tell his parents the truth. And despite his decade of lying, this book rings true. His reward was getting out from under the lie. I think he would have written the book for free just for the unburdening. He states many times the lightness of being after testimony and though he knows it’s very unlikely, hopes Lance can feel the same lightness that comes from telling the truth. This book is Tyler Hamilton’s story but it is closely linked to part of the Armstrong saga.

Like Millar, Hamilton was unaware of systemic drug use until he had joined the professional ranks. US Postal drugs were at first team- provided and paid for. Once you proved yourself as one of the best riders on the team, as someone who could help Lance win the Tour, you earned the right to use EPO. It is fascinating reading, it’s horrifying, it’s depressing. Most unsettling is Lance Armstrong’s behavior. There are many revelations regarding Armstrong’s psychotic need to win. I’ll share just this one.

Tyler was eased out of US Postal because he was too strong a rider and perceived as a threat to Armstrong. So Tyler left and signed with Phonak in 2004. There was a time trial up Mont Ventoux in the 2004 Dauphiné Libéré weeks before the Tour de France. Tyler beat Lance in the TT. Later during the Tour, Floyd Landis, who was still riding for US Postal rode along side Tyler.

“You need to know something”

I pulled in closer. Floyd’s Mennonite conscience was bothering him.

“Lance called the UCI on you,” he said. “He called Hien, after Ventoux. Said you guys and Mayo were on some new shit, told Hien to get on you. He knew they’d call call you in. He’s been talking shit nonstop. And I think it’s right that you know.”

This little story is amazing for many different reasons and the only good one is Floyd Landis telling it to Tyler. I’m guilty of saying some negative things about Floyd, mostly because he was such an idiot liar. But at a point, when he has nothing to gain and he has lost everything else and he starts telling the truth, he gains back my respect, just like Tyler Hamilton has.

I ended up reading these books one right after the other. As I said before, I recommend them both. David Millar is a better writer. He actually has more demons to battle than Hamilton so his story of redemption is inspiring. Tyler Hamilton’s story is more depraved (in a doping sense) but both books are important. A lot of people in cycling are now admitting to past deeds in very unspecific terms. These two authors are both shining lights into some dark corners and making the inevitability of drug use in cycling more human and understandable. Also, in reading these books back to back, it highlights the contrast in how these two people dealt with their fates.

Both had the bad luck to be nearly singled out as dopers when a large percent of the riders were dopers. Millar realized it was the doping that killed his passion for even riding a bike. He took no joy in his EPO-assisted victories, only a temporary satisfaction that the task at hand was completed. He decided to come clean and to become an advocate for clean racing and changing the corrupt system.

Hamilton could not admit to anyone but his wife (who already knew) that he had been a cheat. His lie was so crushing he couldn’t even see a way out. He then spent all his money and energy protecting the lie for years, for nothing, obviously. It was the threat of perjury in that finally broke open the dam. It’s a cruel lesson to learn; the truth will set you free, even if it takes forever.

 

 

 

Gianni

Gianni has left the building.

View Comments

  • @Marcus

    @smithers whilst I make no claims as to knowledge of US legal intricacies or law courts generally (I was a finance lawyer -never went near a court) - I would posit that Marion Jones lying to two separate grand juries (ie. She lied in a criminal investigation) was a far greater offence than Lancy bullshitting a lawyer in a civil deposition... But i think lance would be better served in the short term by doing less triathlon training and more "how to make a shiv out of a bar of soap" practice.

    But then again Lancealready knows how to get disparate nationalities such as Belgies, Colombians and Spaniards workingThor him - so he would probably be Top Dog pretty quick.

    Agreed that the Feds are a lot less likely to go after LA for perjury in a civil deposition.  If it was to a grand jury or Congress, yes.  Moreover the Feds' recent track record with sport & other public figure/perjury trials (Bonds, Clemens, Ted Stevens) has not been good.  Big picture, there's not a lot of appetite for more of them.  Floyd's qui tam/false claims case is another story.

  • @G'phant

    Finally, although my initial post was not a tirade at you, here's a comment that is: if you don"t like the profanity and you don't like the cute names, that's your call. But it's what we do here, quite a lot. And if we had had to choose between sweary name games and being condescending, I rather think we would choose the sweary name games.

    A. FUCKING. PLUS. FUCKING. ONE.

  • I am going to fucking read 'Tomorrow we ride' again, because I am fucking done with all this fucking doping crap.

  • @Marcus

    @Leroy mate you are still fighting blind. Go read LA's SCA testimony (your comments are uninformed until you have read at least this document). But to save you time I willtell you the really provable perjurous statement from him - he clearly, very clearly, couldnthave been clearer, stated that he had never taken PEDs. And that might be what screws him. By the by, they showed the footage of this testimony on Australian TV last Monday (google four corners lance Armstrong and you can probably get it online) - whilst Lance was a world beating cyclist, I think he is an even better liar. He was very impressive.

    Dunno whether US authorities will take action - everyday people make bullshit statements under oath that are later proven false - and if they do, not sure he would go to jail if found guilty.

    Dunno whether you guys know but our vice president of Cycling Australia, Stephen Hodge, resigned yesterdaybecause he doped when racing (he was a super domestique on teams like ONCE - for riders like JaJa). now this fella hadn't been caught by anyone but justtendered his resignation because of mistakes he had made 20 years ago. An admirable gesture from a real gentleman - Australian cyclingswill be poorer for his absence.

    You boys need to learn what fighting blind means... I HAVE NOT CLAIMED ONCE THAT LANCE NEVER LIED UNDER OATH. Also, the fact that he did changes nothing I've said anywhere else here as it was not even peripherally related to any of my points. So... I don't know what "fight" you think is happening but nope, not realizing he had already purjured himself doesn't mean I'm fighting blind. Nor does it mean he'll do any jail time... Barry Bonds purjured himself, McGuire perjured himsefl.. ZERO jail tiem between them. So... who's blind exactly?

  • @G'phant

    @Leroy

    Mate, what part of my post made you think it was a tirade "at" you, or that I thought innocent riders, sponsors and teams leaving the sport is a good thing? It was only "addressed" to you because you had posted the news of Rabobank's announcement. The point, to be very clear, is that Pharmstrong, Brooneel, Ferrari, the other cheaters and UCI have fucked things up for everyone else, riders and fans alike - that the result will be less sponsorship and more folded teams, and worst of all more pompous uselessness from the UCI. I would've thought it was pretty obvious (e.g. the phrase 'worst of all') that I don't think that's a good thing. That, in fact, my point is really very similar to yours, inasmuch as it is a lament (well ok, rage) against the damage done to the sport by the cheaters (and those who seem insufficiently interested in rooting them out).

    But to your suggestion that it would be better for it not to come out: I do not agree. Just because Pharmy has gone doesn't mean everything is good. Getting that egregious prick Brooneel out of the sport and away from poisoning more young men's and women's souls is worth it alone. Not to mention the far greater corrosive damage that would have been caused by a perpetuation of the knowledge that the bastards had got away with it. Not to mention the, to me, moral offensiveness of hoping that evil doesn't get it's comeuppance.

    Finally, although my initial post was not a tirade at you, here's a comment that is: if you don"t like the profanity and you don't like the cute names, that's your call. But it's what we do here, quite a lot. And if we had had to choose between sweary name games and being condescending, I rather think we would choose the sweary name games.

    1. The part that said @Leroy is what made me believe it was directed at me... If it wasn't than I apologize for assuming otherwise.

    2. As I've already said, I disagree... I don't think the sport is dirty today with or without these revelations. I think there are still dopers out there but I believe they act alone and in the dark today instead of the coordinated effort it was. So, in as much, these "revelations" have done nothing to change the reality of doping in sports today and only serve as punitive effect. I'd have rather seen Lance carry on fooling the ignorant masses and cycling bring on MORE sponsors than have Lance get what he deserves at the expense of the sport, I don't agree with current cyclists being made to pay for this 'victory'. I love cycling more than I hate Lance and any desire to see him punished is far outweighed by the reality that it's bad for the image of the sport, it's that simple.

    3. I don't know what the fucking problem is you with dimwitted dumbfucks about "condescension"... Maybe it's a language barrier or maybe you're just a bit insecure and any opinion not in line with yours comes off as condescending. I don't much give a fuck... I'm entitled to my opinion as much as you're entitled to yours so fuck you if you don't like my fucking opinion..... Is that the style you prefer? To me it seems far ruder than simply disagreeing as reasonable adults and debating our opinions but if that's what you're looking for, I can tell you to go fuck yourself all day long whenever you disagree with me. I don't much see the point but hey, if that's how you rolll... I'm the obliging type.

  • @Leroy

    @Oli Are you talking about me saying that I hand't realized that Lance had lied under oath?? That's far from "fighting blind" and doesn't change any of my arguments... I knew he LIED, I just hadn't realized that he'd already lied UNDER OATH.

    Though re-reading what it's stated he claimed under oath, that's actually a fiarly impossible to prove lie...

    I am simply referring to your ill-informed (yes - because you clearly haven't read his testimony. Have you done so yet? If not, stop posting and go read it.) statement that Armstrong's statements "impossible toprove lies". They are clearly not.

    Oli's "fighting blind" call was a throwaway line - now getting Close to Lexicon worthy - on the basis that you have made far-reaching comments and very long posts without reading what just might become the Magna Carta of a new age in cycling. Ioli said fighting blind I say speaking from a position of ignorance.

    It is very rare for Oli, Minion, Gphant and me to agree on something - but you may hava achieved it

  • Not sure where it was but I read that Skoda have pulled their sponsorship of the Tour.

  • @Marcus

    @Leroy

    @Oli Are you talking about me saying that I hand't realized that Lance had lied under oath?? That's far from "fighting blind" and doesn't change any of my arguments... I knew he LIED, I just hadn't realized that he'd already lied UNDER OATH.

    Though re-reading what it's stated he claimed under oath, that's actually a fiarly impossible to prove lie...

    I am simply referring to your ill-informed (yes - because you clearly haven't read his testimony. Have you done so yet? If not, stop posting and go read it.) statement that Armstrong's statements "impossible toprove lies". They are clearly not.

    Oli's "fighting blind" call was a throwaway line - now getting Close to Lexicon worthy - on the basis that you have made far-reaching comments and very long posts without reading what just might become the Magna Carta of a new age in cycling. Ioli said fighting blind I say speaking from a position of ignorance.

    It is very rare for Oli, Minion, Gphant and me to agree on something - but you may hava achieved it

    I have read the majority of it and haven't refuted any of it... so exactly what the fuck am I fighting that I'm fighting blind??? I've said he's a doper, a cheat, a fraud, and I've agreed that he did everythign in his power to keep it from coming to light. Please... explain what's blind about that or how that disagrees with anyone? The only two points I seem to disagree on with anyone is whether Lance masterminded doping peloton wide or whether he'll do jail time... Nothing I've said has been "far reaching" and, as I've said several goddamn times now, I've read the huge majority of the report, I don't need to read another 40-50 pages to know he's dirty and he cheated and he intimated witnesses... What the fuck are you even on about? Nowhere have I defended Lance as innocent... I've only stated my opinion on the value of proving his guilt for all to see and my opinion on the likliehood of him doing jail time.

    Perhaps you don't understand the American criminal justice system and how hard shit like this is to prove, even WITH a mountain of evidence.... Fuck, just look at OJ... dude chopped his wife's fucking head off and managed to go free. Michael Jackson, molested kids for decades without any criminal charges... You've got to be a slackwitted fucking retard or a foreigner to not recognize that the US criminal justice system is heavily balanced in favor of people with money. If OJ can get off for murder and MJ can get off for molesting kids for decades... Do you honestly think that Lance is going to jail for something that, no matter how big a deal to you or I, the majority of the American public flat out doesn't care about??? If so... I'm afraid I'm not the one who's blind here mate.

  • @Leroy now I remember you. Weren't you the one who challenged someone (possibly me) to some sort of ride-off? Months ago?

  • @Marcus

    @Leroy now I remember you. Weren't you the one who challenged someone (possibly me) to some sort of ride-off? Months ago?

    Not that I recall... I actually haven't been around in probably near upon a year. Was traveling overseas for work and had limited connectivity outside the office, which is heavily firewalled and won't allow me to access much of anything. Gave up trying to use my cell phone pretty quick.

     

    ...that, and I'm neither a particularly fast nor particularly fit rider so I doubt I'd be challenging anyone to any races unless I was drunk and feeling bold.

1 29 30 31 32 33 62
Share
Published by
Gianni

Recent Posts

Anatomy of a Photo: Sock & Shoe Game

I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Men’s World Championship Road Race 2017

Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Women’s World Championship Road Race 2017

The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Vuelta a España 2017

Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Clasica Ciclista San Sebastian 2017

This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…

7 years ago

Route Finding

I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…

8 years ago