I must admit to not having read most of the cycling memoirs in the Works. I may eventually but the local public library doesn’t carry any of them and never will so I’ll have to buy them or ask Frank to tote everything he has to Hawaii. I did get off my wallet and buy these two and it was money well spent. David Millar and Tyler Hamilton have produced two excellent cycling books, parallel stories in very general terms and times. The contrast of how two people in similar straits handle the truth and the divergent roads it puts them on is compelling.
Doping in professional cycling is still secretive enough that it is best told from someone all the way on the inside. Journalists will be lied to by cyclists. Federal grand juries do better at getting the truth but we usually don’t hear it. Cyclists who lived the lie and need to unburden themselves make a good conduit. I can’t begin to explain it as well as Tyler or David did; their inner world of professional cycling is nothing we hear much about. In the 1990s it was the wild west where the law was absent. Spanish “doctors”, syringes and mini-centrifuges ruled the day. It’s such a huge subject, too interwoven with passion and pressure, so much grey area. For a person like me who likes to talk about doping in black and white, I’ve learned how institutionalized and insidious it was (past tense, I hope). It’s not so simple. It’s tragic. To feed the young ambitious athlete into a system where there is no choice but to accept the drug system is criminal. When money is at stake and the UCI is complicit, as is team management, those are some criminals.
Racing Through the Dark-by David Millar. I’ll also admit to being a long time admirer of David Millar. He has always been well- spoken and not afraid to confront, two qualities I admire and personally lack, but they make a good writer. Millar is a military brat who found his cycling talent in the 10 mile British time trial club races. He ended up living his dream, riding on the Cofidis team, France’s well- funded but dysfunctional squad. He spent his first few years with Cofidis riding clean, yet watching how others “prepared”.
“In my youthful exuberance, I was telling anybody who would listen that I’d won in De Panne and broken the course record with a hematocrit of only 40 percent. I went to see Casagrande and his roommate, whom I refer to as L’Équipier (the teammate), so that I could show Casagrande the test results.
I stood there, a big grin on my face, expecting Casagrande to congratulate me and say something morale boosting. But he didn’t. After a pause, he handed the results back to me and then turned to speak to his roommate in Italian.
“Perché non é a cinquate?” Casagrande asked L’Équipier, puzzled, Why isn’t he at fifty?
No one talked about doping and no one talked about not doping. Eventually, after VDB self-destructed and Casagrande was busted, Millar became a team leader. And with that mantle came the responsibility to produce results, be a professional. And eventually he was implicated by a teammate, evidence was found, he was out of cycling, deeply in debt, and drinking his way to the bottom.
For some interesting video here is a recent Spanish documentary from the inner ring.
The Secret Race-by Tyler Hamilton and Daniel Coyle. Tyler Hamilton and I grew up in the same end of Massachusetts, he went to the same prep school @rob and I dropped out of, so I always felt slightly connected to him. So I was a fan boy and stood by his fantastic excuses for too long.
The whole wretched story of doping in cycling is right here. Tyler Hamilton cheated and lied for so long, it took until 2011 before he could tell his parents the truth. And despite his decade of lying, this book rings true. His reward was getting out from under the lie. I think he would have written the book for free just for the unburdening. He states many times the lightness of being after testimony and though he knows it’s very unlikely, hopes Lance can feel the same lightness that comes from telling the truth. This book is Tyler Hamilton’s story but it is closely linked to part of the Armstrong saga.
Like Millar, Hamilton was unaware of systemic drug use until he had joined the professional ranks. US Postal drugs were at first team- provided and paid for. Once you proved yourself as one of the best riders on the team, as someone who could help Lance win the Tour, you earned the right to use EPO. It is fascinating reading, it’s horrifying, it’s depressing. Most unsettling is Lance Armstrong’s behavior. There are many revelations regarding Armstrong’s psychotic need to win. I’ll share just this one.
Tyler was eased out of US Postal because he was too strong a rider and perceived as a threat to Armstrong. So Tyler left and signed with Phonak in 2004. There was a time trial up Mont Ventoux in the 2004 Dauphiné Libéré weeks before the Tour de France. Tyler beat Lance in the TT. Later during the Tour, Floyd Landis, who was still riding for US Postal rode along side Tyler.
“You need to know something”
I pulled in closer. Floyd’s Mennonite conscience was bothering him.
“Lance called the UCI on you,” he said. “He called Hien, after Ventoux. Said you guys and Mayo were on some new shit, told Hien to get on you. He knew they’d call call you in. He’s been talking shit nonstop. And I think it’s right that you know.”
This little story is amazing for many different reasons and the only good one is Floyd Landis telling it to Tyler. I’m guilty of saying some negative things about Floyd, mostly because he was such an idiot liar. But at a point, when he has nothing to gain and he has lost everything else and he starts telling the truth, he gains back my respect, just like Tyler Hamilton has.
I ended up reading these books one right after the other. As I said before, I recommend them both. David Millar is a better writer. He actually has more demons to battle than Hamilton so his story of redemption is inspiring. Tyler Hamilton’s story is more depraved (in a doping sense) but both books are important. A lot of people in cycling are now admitting to past deeds in very unspecific terms. These two authors are both shining lights into some dark corners and making the inevitability of drug use in cycling more human and understandable. Also, in reading these books back to back, it highlights the contrast in how these two people dealt with their fates.
Both had the bad luck to be nearly singled out as dopers when a large percent of the riders were dopers. Millar realized it was the doping that killed his passion for even riding a bike. He took no joy in his EPO-assisted victories, only a temporary satisfaction that the task at hand was completed. He decided to come clean and to become an advocate for clean racing and changing the corrupt system.
Hamilton could not admit to anyone but his wife (who already knew) that he had been a cheat. His lie was so crushing he couldn’t even see a way out. He then spent all his money and energy protecting the lie for years, for nothing, obviously. It was the threat of perjury in that finally broke open the dam. It’s a cruel lesson to learn; the truth will set you free, even if it takes forever.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@ken Yeah baby, Garmin may be able to hire Yates and Servais, who has to be next. I agree with you, Sky is fucked to do this. So who could they hire? Charlie Mottet and Bradley McGee?
@ken
You could've had a V8!
@Marcus
Amen to that... this is just getting to be absurd now.
I think Sky genuinely believe that the only way to eradicate doping is to not have anybody on the team who has been involved in it, and if the sport needs to go through that catharsis then so be it.
Yates knew what Sky's policy was when he joined. It's been very clear from Day 1 when they didn't sign Miller.
He hasn't just been involved in doping he has also presumably not been completely honest with his employer, and that doesn't leave them with a lot of choice.
@ChrisO I agree, Chris... this had to be done w/ Sky.
@ In General: As far as Sky's policy and if they're fucked in the head for doing things this way... I don't see it that way at all. It's their policy from inception and more power to them for sticking to their guns on this instead of backtracking under public scrutiny. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with Sky's policy... what I'm saying is that until EVERY team adopts Sky's policy, none of these dismissals from Sky are likely to result in the end of their careers.
I think most of these guys will find their place again, work into a new team, champion the new cause, and all parties (including professional cycling) will be all the stronger for it.
Keep that restroom fan on, continue venting the shitty air... things will eventually freshen up. At this point, we're still standing over the porcelain bowl watching the COTHO swirl around in circles, leaving a thick stain in his wake.
@ChrisO I'm not sure whether Sky believe this will eradicate doping or just hope that the world will see them as a clean team if they have no ex dopers on the team.
I admire them for sticking to their guns but they have lost at least three of their best staff in Yates, Julich and De Jongh. We'll see what impact that will have on their results next year.....
@ChrisO
Another point that has bearing on this is that Brailsford has said that they will go through every member of the team again and they will "be supportive" I think we can read in to that "If you fess up now, will give you some sort of severance package and conclude your contract amicably, if you hang on and get discovered, we will just sack you on the spot". It is therefore not surprising that we are seeing a set of x dopers or people who have been connected to it now decide that their best option is to go now, at least get something and then get a job with another team.
Brailsford is an adamant anti-doper, you can call in zealous but ultimately he has the courage of his convictions and is following them through, he wants a pure team and in a way he is taking chances doing it....but....if it comes off then he will known as "the guy who cleaned up cycling" even though there are many more than him involved. I think he is making a pretty bold move and is probably pissed off that people have lied to him....if it works he is to be congratulated, if not then he will be hanging out there with his arse in the wind!
@Oli
Yes, fair point.. it's just that this "holier than thou" tone from Sky is sticking in my throat a bit....
Well, it's cold wet and windy outside. Great! Time to do some pedalling instead of posting....
If Brailsford didn't know or suspect Yates, Rogers, Leinders, De Jongh and Julich (not to mention some others) had a history then he's either a dumb fuck or a fucking liar. Simple.
"Julich, Yates and De Jongh will all receive parachute payments for confessing to their past but any members of staff signing a declaration of innocence who are subsequently "outed" as proven former dopers will be sacked with no financial package."
thought as much....expect a purge....