I must admit to not having read most of the cycling memoirs in the Works. I may eventually but the local public library doesn’t carry any of them and never will so I’ll have to buy them or ask Frank to tote everything he has to Hawaii. I did get off my wallet and buy these two and it was money well spent. David Millar and Tyler Hamilton have produced two excellent cycling books, parallel stories in very general terms and times. The contrast of how two people in similar straits handle the truth and the divergent roads it puts them on is compelling.
Doping in professional cycling is still secretive enough that it is best told from someone all the way on the inside. Journalists will be lied to by cyclists. Federal grand juries do better at getting the truth but we usually don’t hear it. Cyclists who lived the lie and need to unburden themselves make a good conduit. I can’t begin to explain it as well as Tyler or David did; their inner world of professional cycling is nothing we hear much about. In the 1990s it was the wild west where the law was absent. Spanish “doctors”, syringes and mini-centrifuges ruled the day. It’s such a huge subject, too interwoven with passion and pressure, so much grey area. For a person like me who likes to talk about doping in black and white, I’ve learned how institutionalized and insidious it was (past tense, I hope). It’s not so simple. It’s tragic. To feed the young ambitious athlete into a system where there is no choice but to accept the drug system is criminal. When money is at stake and the UCI is complicit, as is team management, those are some criminals.
Racing Through the Dark-by David Millar. I’ll also admit to being a long time admirer of David Millar. He has always been well- spoken and not afraid to confront, two qualities I admire and personally lack, but they make a good writer. Millar is a military brat who found his cycling talent in the 10 mile British time trial club races. He ended up living his dream, riding on the Cofidis team, France’s well- funded but dysfunctional squad. He spent his first few years with Cofidis riding clean, yet watching how others “prepared”.
“In my youthful exuberance, I was telling anybody who would listen that I’d won in De Panne and broken the course record with a hematocrit of only 40 percent. I went to see Casagrande and his roommate, whom I refer to as L’Équipier (the teammate), so that I could show Casagrande the test results.
I stood there, a big grin on my face, expecting Casagrande to congratulate me and say something morale boosting. But he didn’t. After a pause, he handed the results back to me and then turned to speak to his roommate in Italian.
“Perché non é a cinquate?” Casagrande asked L’Équipier, puzzled, Why isn’t he at fifty?
No one talked about doping and no one talked about not doping. Eventually, after VDB self-destructed and Casagrande was busted, Millar became a team leader. And with that mantle came the responsibility to produce results, be a professional. And eventually he was implicated by a teammate, evidence was found, he was out of cycling, deeply in debt, and drinking his way to the bottom.
For some interesting video here is a recent Spanish documentary from the inner ring.
The Secret Race-by Tyler Hamilton and Daniel Coyle. Tyler Hamilton and I grew up in the same end of Massachusetts, he went to the same prep school @rob and I dropped out of, so I always felt slightly connected to him. So I was a fan boy and stood by his fantastic excuses for too long.
The whole wretched story of doping in cycling is right here. Tyler Hamilton cheated and lied for so long, it took until 2011 before he could tell his parents the truth. And despite his decade of lying, this book rings true. His reward was getting out from under the lie. I think he would have written the book for free just for the unburdening. He states many times the lightness of being after testimony and though he knows it’s very unlikely, hopes Lance can feel the same lightness that comes from telling the truth. This book is Tyler Hamilton’s story but it is closely linked to part of the Armstrong saga.
Like Millar, Hamilton was unaware of systemic drug use until he had joined the professional ranks. US Postal drugs were at first team- provided and paid for. Once you proved yourself as one of the best riders on the team, as someone who could help Lance win the Tour, you earned the right to use EPO. It is fascinating reading, it’s horrifying, it’s depressing. Most unsettling is Lance Armstrong’s behavior. There are many revelations regarding Armstrong’s psychotic need to win. I’ll share just this one.
Tyler was eased out of US Postal because he was too strong a rider and perceived as a threat to Armstrong. So Tyler left and signed with Phonak in 2004. There was a time trial up Mont Ventoux in the 2004 Dauphiné Libéré weeks before the Tour de France. Tyler beat Lance in the TT. Later during the Tour, Floyd Landis, who was still riding for US Postal rode along side Tyler.
“You need to know something”
I pulled in closer. Floyd’s Mennonite conscience was bothering him.
“Lance called the UCI on you,” he said. “He called Hien, after Ventoux. Said you guys and Mayo were on some new shit, told Hien to get on you. He knew they’d call call you in. He’s been talking shit nonstop. And I think it’s right that you know.”
This little story is amazing for many different reasons and the only good one is Floyd Landis telling it to Tyler. I’m guilty of saying some negative things about Floyd, mostly because he was such an idiot liar. But at a point, when he has nothing to gain and he has lost everything else and he starts telling the truth, he gains back my respect, just like Tyler Hamilton has.
I ended up reading these books one right after the other. As I said before, I recommend them both. David Millar is a better writer. He actually has more demons to battle than Hamilton so his story of redemption is inspiring. Tyler Hamilton’s story is more depraved (in a doping sense) but both books are important. A lot of people in cycling are now admitting to past deeds in very unspecific terms. These two authors are both shining lights into some dark corners and making the inevitability of drug use in cycling more human and understandable. Also, in reading these books back to back, it highlights the contrast in how these two people dealt with their fates.
Both had the bad luck to be nearly singled out as dopers when a large percent of the riders were dopers. Millar realized it was the doping that killed his passion for even riding a bike. He took no joy in his EPO-assisted victories, only a temporary satisfaction that the task at hand was completed. He decided to come clean and to become an advocate for clean racing and changing the corrupt system.
Hamilton could not admit to anyone but his wife (who already knew) that he had been a cheat. His lie was so crushing he couldn’t even see a way out. He then spent all his money and energy protecting the lie for years, for nothing, obviously. It was the threat of perjury in that finally broke open the dam. It’s a cruel lesson to learn; the truth will set you free, even if it takes forever.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@Beers
@Chris
@ken
its now 3:1 against Sky. If all of cycling took the Team Sky approach, I would be half a chance to get a stagiare contract next year - because there would be virtually no one left in the sport. If the choice is between telling the truth about something in the past or lying about the past and being able to still feed your kids, the latter will usually win.
And that's why the Sky declarations are pointless. And the fear of being found out about having lied about your past? Well unless you get caught in the USPS fallout, I am tipping there aint going to be too many other investigations into the past. If you have a doping history, you have already crossed the rubicon of lies - one more is pretty easy.
So far I only know of Stephen Hodge and Steffen Kjærgaard who have actually made something close to voluntary confessions. And Hodge is the only one who has felt repercussions (but his hand may have been forced by the Matt White situation anyway).
Oh yes - and dont you think it is more than a little ironic that Sky have taken the moral high ground given their owner? Wonder if any of Rupert's kids ever authorised hacking COTHO's phone?
Brother, if I were the COTHO I would just ask all Spanish dopers, I mean riders, to hold back their support for me, it does notreally help that much. In fact, it kind of hurts.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/valverde-voices-support-for-lance-armstrong
@Buck Rogers fuck me. what a joke he is. absolutely no sign of contrition over his own seedy past, spends the duration of his ban training with his team and now this.
And in breaking news Lance Armstrong takes out Spanish citizenship and is exonerated by the Real Federación Española de Ciclismo. The Spanish language version of Wikipedia reinstates all eight of his Tour wins.
@sthilzy
At the risk of sounding like a touchy feely therapist type, that might have a lot to do with LA not being a genuine, happy person.........
@Chris
"And in breaking news Lance Armstrong takes out Spanish citizenship and is exonerated by the Real Federación Española de Ciclismo. The Spanish language version of Wikipedia reinstates all eight of his Tour wins."
Ha! Almost lost my mouthful of bourbon on that one!
This is kind of irrelevant, but this may be as much as a confession as we'll ever get from LA. Especiallysince just a few weeks ago he stood on a stage at a Livstrong event and introduced himself as 7 time tour winner
http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory/armstrong-removes-tour-titles-twitter-bio-17542028
@Chris Good points well made. You are right, the path you suggest may be the best way forward. The alternative hardline
would encourage the lies to continue, I hadn't thought that through. Just unfortunate that best path still leaves the doubt to sniffed out and devoured by the wolves.. Best of a bad thing I guess.
From the Ottawa Citizen;
Writer Bruce Arthur gives the speech that disgrace cyclist Lance Armstrong, above, likely will never make.
@Marcus
Do we really think that Brailsford is driving this? I would postulate that Sky have instigated the "gag" to protect their brand...probably nothing to do with DB. You might find that some marketing/PR manager at Sky just picked up the phone and said "No-one in our team talks to the press, see Rabobank? That's us if your guys start joining the debate, Sky does not want to get involved in this in any way"...tbh I can understand why, in the current feeding frenzy how would opening your mouth help, it looks like there may be a mutiny against the UCI brewing and that is going to create a whole load of shitty mess.
My money is on Sky quietly biding their time on the side lines, staying out of the line of sight till things Polarise a little regarding the UCI and Armstrong. They will either carry on regardless or weigh in on one side..