[rule number =42/]
Alright people, we heard you. Chris Froome ran. But he was going to lose the Tour de France. I’ve got news for you: Cyclocrossers run, too. So do convicts, burglars, children, footballers, and triathletes. And anyone who has ever seen a Grizzly Bear up close. And all of them ran because they were going to lose something. The person with the bear has the best case here, as far as I’m concerned, and I’ll be disappointed if they didn’t trip something with a heartbeat just to gain a little extra advantage.
Because if you’re already stooping so low as to run, your life better be on the line, and you better be willing to play dirty.
You know what the worst kind of running is? A road cyclist in carbon-soled shoes designed to be so inflexible that even Admiral Tarkin would approve of them. I once jacked up a cyclocross bike so badly I had to break the chain to get it unwound, and because I didn’t have a chain tool I ran the rest of the lap to finish the race. Finishing the race on foot was almost as humiliating as crashing because I was too dumb to appreciate that 15 PSI tires don’t corner as tightly as 110 PSI tires do.
Worst. Day. Of. My. Life.
Including that time I crapped my pantaloons on a transcontinental flight in India.
In conclusion of Froome’s Rule #42 violation, here are the facts:
The verdict is: he violated Rule #42 and the UCI turned a blind eye to how rotten a runner he is. Next they’ll allow motors in bike races while pretending to scan for them.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
LOL at the Jensie factoid at the bottom. @frank could be onto something there. Chuck Norris got some time in the light having good endless facts conceived about him. Why not Jens?!
@Frank You should give us a list of rules that it is and is not OK for the pros to break. Just so we all know.
Excellent piece Frank. I watched Froome mincing up Ventoux in utter disbelief. Surely there could be few clearer violations of Rule 42. I was also a bit alarmed that his $18,000 Dogma couldn't survive a nudge from a Moto as well. Surely the situation called for a casual inspection of the damage, a Gallic shrug of the shoulders and a patient wait for the replacement hideously expensive carbon Pinarello which apparently used champagne stems for seat posts. Having never worn the Maillot Jaune or even come close to winning any of my local D grade races should not of course disqualify me from criticising him, just as it doesn't prevent me from shouting tactical orders at the TV. Rule 42 is there for a reason - it prevents us from looking even more ridiculous than we already do. A grown man wearing a yellow skivvy trying to climb a mountain in tiny tip toes does not help our cause.
The absolutely heartbreaking sight of Froome running without his bike must have factored into the decision to award him Molemma's time and keep him in Yellow. I've not been his greatest fan but this Tour has shown a tenacity that few can match. Chapeau Chris Froome. You may run ugly and ride ugly but you're a better man than most on that mountain.
They made the wrong call. Froome made the wrong call. Abandoning your bike without a replacement is wrong. Running? wrong, wrong, wrong. This was a racing incident.
This could have been one of the great stories of the Tour, the leading rider dealt a cruel blow just as he was about to crush his rivals, waits interminably long for his trusty lieutenants to come to his aid, finally to the dismay of his legions of fans he completes the course to face an enormous deficit the following day, which of course he duly recovers with one of the greatest ITT in history, driven by anger at his treatment and the energy he saved whilst waiting tranquillo for a bike to ride to the finish the day before.
Holding onto a moto is also wrong.
Loved the footage of him on the yellow toy bike with the Mavic pedals though. Reminded me a lot of my pedalling style and bike handling skills.
Something else is bothering me. There's all this hoohah about disc brakes not being compatible and the neutral service is going to be up the shit, because disc brakes are the work of the devil (not that devil). Not only are they rotating blades of death, but they render the neutral service vehicle useless...
What the fuck did we just see? They didn't have a bike that fitted the leader of the race, in either size or shoes. It would have been just as useful if it did have disc brakes.
I reckon more riders should be signing on in the morning in MTB shoes. Just in case.
And what about rule #69....Chris froome broke rule #69 too....
Chris Froome aka Twinkle Toes aka Tiny Carbon Soled Dancer.
All neutral bikes should be fitted with flat rubber pedals so what cleat system isn't a problem.
I'm just glad the commissaires came to the correct decision - it would have been a travesty if Froome had lost yellow because of fuckwit fans and too many close motos.