[rule number =42/]
Alright people, we heard you. Chris Froome ran. But he was going to lose the Tour de France. I’ve got news for you: Cyclocrossers run, too. So do convicts, burglars, children, footballers, and triathletes. And anyone who has ever seen a Grizzly Bear up close. And all of them ran because they were going to lose something. The person with the bear has the best case here, as far as I’m concerned, and I’ll be disappointed if they didn’t trip something with a heartbeat just to gain a little extra advantage.
Because if you’re already stooping so low as to run, your life better be on the line, and you better be willing to play dirty.
You know what the worst kind of running is? A road cyclist in carbon-soled shoes designed to be so inflexible that even Admiral Tarkin would approve of them. I once jacked up a cyclocross bike so badly I had to break the chain to get it unwound, and because I didn’t have a chain tool I ran the rest of the lap to finish the race. Finishing the race on foot was almost as humiliating as crashing because I was too dumb to appreciate that 15 PSI tires don’t corner as tightly as 110 PSI tires do.
Worst. Day. Of. My. Life.
Including that time I crapped my pantaloons on a transcontinental flight in India.
In conclusion of Froome’s Rule #42 violation, here are the facts:
The verdict is: he violated Rule #42 and the UCI turned a blind eye to how rotten a runner he is. Next they’ll allow motors in bike races while pretending to scan for them.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
Just one observation. Isn't there a rule which states that riders involved in a crash within 3km of the finish will get the same time as the group they crashed with? Maybe this is only true for sprint finishes? If not, the they were right to give Frome and Porte the same time as Mollema. Rules are Rules, and must be followed.
@VbyV
Apparently that rule doesn't apply on uphill/mountain finishes, so in the end it was up to the commissaire's discretion. I'm sure their decision was helped by Adam Yates' loudly and repeatedly stated wishes that he not get the jersey through this incident.
@Dean C
Hear, hear.
I love that Froome has said that they're constantly joking about the running in the Sky bus - imagine if he was taking it all too seriously when it's so patently ridiculous!
@ChrisO
amen
Porte should have punched him in the face for running too close to the riders as he rode past.
Also, it happens more often than you might think:
@dyalander
Cancellara pacing Contador back in their Saxo days.
PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME, PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME, PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME, PEANUT BETTER WITH A BASEBALL BAT..................
@frank
I recall a story about you running across a bike course during a certain French road race in 2006. Another good reason for you to eschew running.
Maybe Paolo Salvodelli gave you a passing thought last week too.
Looks like Froomey should try out for the Kenyan track team for Rio this summer with those running skills.
@frank
I must argue in the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg (thanks, Wikipedia). Court of First Instance on behalf of Monsieur Froome.
Upon the last paragraph of explanation of Rule #42, ...and should only run if being chased. And even then, one should only run fast enough to prevent capture. (sic)
Your Honor, I rest my case.
@frank
Grammatical errors add nuance and character to my posts, like a fine wine.
Which is better, to look fantastic atop the podium in Paris or stand there to avoid running? Someone somewhere argued that he *was* being chased and only ran fast enough to avoid losing yellow.