I love every kind of bike, from the tricked-out fixies all over Seattle (hello – hilly-ass town! Unless your fixie is a 39-27, you are not making a sensible choice!), to the awesome Dutch Bikes, to the phenomenal racers around town, I love them all.
I am, however, a bitch when it comes to bike noise. Some noises can be forgiven, while others can not. My good friends at Speedy Reedy in Seattle know this all too well, I think, based on a recent comment the head mechanic made, “I don’t doubt it makes noise, I just don’t know if it’s the spoke tension…” The point is, if it’s making a sound, that’s kinetic energy not focused in making me go forward even though it’s caused by energy I’m putting into the bicycle. And that’s bad. There’s also a certain mechanical challenge in making a bike run silently, one that I enjoy when it’s not pissing me off: working through the possible sources of the noise in a process of elimination and the thrill of having silenced it.
There is only one noise that I accept on a bike, and that is drive train noise. That is, if you’re running Shimano or SRAM. Campy, I have found, runs almost silently. My bike – aside from the dull pop I’m currently hearing in my saddle when my fat-ass runs over a big enough bump – is virtually silent these days. All I hear is the hum of my wheels, and that is a sound worth buying wheels for. That said, Shimano and SRAM are simply noisy. The chain or the pulleys in the derailleur or something but they simply make noise. And, while it’s still a loss in kinetic energy, that’s OK.
But a squeaky chain? Unforgivable. I don’t care who you are, but if you own a bicycle, you can buy a can of WD-40 and make it stop-the-fuck squeaking. Or Tri-Flow. Or, better yet, something your local bike shop mechanic recommends. Topic closed.
My point is, I am not a bike snob. I am, however, a nod snob. Some cyclist will nod at anyone riding another bike. Others will nod at anyone who nods at them. Paradoxically, many of them will not nod at a female cyclist, unless they didn’t realize she was a female.
I, on the other hand, am very judicious when it comes to nodding at a cyclist. The cyclist’s nod is an acknowledgment of a kindred spirit, of souls suffering towards a similar goal. It implies a similar level of devotion to the sport, a willingness to betray accepted social norms for the life of a cyclist. This is a vaguely-defined set of criteria more accurately measured by stating those qualities which will result in me not nodding at a fellow cyclist.
Those qualities are as follows, in no particular order:
I think that covers it.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
It begs the question, Frank, what the fuck were you doing hanging out in a remcumbent riders' shed?
@Brett
It was at SpeedyReedy in Seattle. The other recumbent was built by Calfee! By the way, that's SRAM Red on there, and check out the length of that chain!
@frank
Rule# 666: If distance from chain rings to cogset is greater than your bikes wheelbase you must die.
@frank
Is a violation of Rule# 71 allowed if the only alternative is being passed by such an abomination as this......"thing"?
That said, I did a 320km ride last year and when things turn up, 'bents go back, but when things turn down, they are fuckin' fast. Much like people too fat too climb, but with 10^100000 times more shame.
@Collin
It's a violation of Rule 5 to have them close enough to pass you, period.
How can anyone truly passionate about the sport NOT be a nod snob? There are people on bikes and then there are people who bleed bikes, ride them, love them, care about them, and really have a passion for the sport.
The best, and simplest, rule might be not nodding at people who don't look cool. Anyone with a bit of Velominati in them can spot someone not looking cool quickly. It's like another talented, besides being able to HTFU at a moments notice.
As for noise - I had a noise coming from my newest bike for a few weeks, got it worked on because I could not figure out what the hell was wrong with it, and it went away for awhile. Then it came back. I nearly went insane. Thankfully I finally figured out what the hell it was (freehub body issue) and the company warranted the wheel, though it was 2 months past the limit. Nice!
I now have a proper bad weather bike. My other three road bikes are only ridden on clear, dry days. All of them shift beautifully and don't make a sound. Silence. It is pure sweetness.
I can function much better on a daily basis when all of my bikes are in fine working order. When one is out of commission or creaking or something, I am just relentless dogged by it, not feeling quite settled in any way. Anyone else have this?
We might need to work on an apt word for this condition. I'll check out The Lexicon thought to make sure this -itis isn't already listed.
@Ron
Velobsessivitis?
That is a fine offering, G'phant, but that seems more like someone who is overly concerned about one part of their bicycle, say, their...bars...
I'm talking more about a condition where you always have a nagging feeling, no matter what you are doing, when one of your bikes is making a creak, has a slow leak you can't cure, needs some attention...
I like that word, but I'm not sure if it aptly describes the condition I'm talking about.
Then again, we should let the VeloRulers decide...
@Ron
CAD (Cycling Affective Disorder)?
Cyclosis?
@Ron, @G'phant
Interesting concept, and there might be a good word for it, but I think we're struggling to come up with one easily because what you describe is just part and parcel of being a Velominatus. It's all part of La Vie Velominatus.