Those of you who have been studying our catalog of The Rules will have noticed that eyewear is to be cycling-specific, and should always accompany you on your rides. There is a functional reason for this: your eyes are a valuable asset which you want to protect from UV rays, debris, and wind. There is also a stylish reason: in this age of near-universal helmet usage, your helmet will look way too bare on your noggin without the balance provided by your eyewear. (It is not acceptable, by the way, to wear a full beard as a counter-balance to your helmet. The only “cyclist” ever to wear a full beard was that Russian Guy in American Flyers, and I think one look at that guy will explain to you why that doesn’t work.)
I have cultivated a life-long obsession with finding the perfect pair of sunglasses. It started when I was a kid, buying authentic imitation Oakley Blades at the local Fleet Farm so I might look a bit more like my childhood cycling hero, Greg LeMond. I ran through lots of cheap pairs that looked like Oakleys (but weren’t) until I was perhaps 13 years old and I bought a used pair of old black Blades from my dad who had just bought a fluorescent yellow pair of Mumbos. I remember sitting in my room, mesmerized by the iridium lens and running my finger over the white “OAKLEY” logo on the earpiece. I was well on my way to looking like a Pro.
But eyewear satisfaction proved temporary and elusive. By the time I owned the Blades, they were already terribly outdated, with the the Mumbos replacing the Razorblades, which replaced the model I had. My quest continued.
Eventually, I purchased my first pair of Shots, beginning a 15-year love affair with Briko. In the Nordic skiing microworld, these babies were the shit because they had the full ski goggle-like band that kept them on your head and allowed you to perch the glasses safely on your hat without worrying about them falling off during a race.
This seemingly minor detail inadvertently changed my life, as I became consumed by the details of how best to wear hats, and how best to pair your sunglasses with them. In skiing, it became a very carefully studied system of wearing your hat using a technique I call the Three-Point System where the hat sits just above the point where your spine enters your skull, covers the tips of your ears, and comes to rest close above the eyebrows. The sunglasses must then be perched upon the hat at just the right height and just the right angle in order to maximize what my dad always teasingly referred to as “the Pro Look”. (It goes without saying that “the Pro Look” also involves a carefully cultivated facial expression and a plethora of other accessories.)
This also influenced my technique for wearing cycling caps as well. (I hereby formally confess to breaking Rule #11 as a reckless, fool-hearty youngster.) When the cap was worn visor-forward, it could not be too high or low, and could never be tilted too far forward or backward, with sunglasses to be be placed just above the brim. If the cap was worn visor-backward, its positioning bore great resemblance to the Three-Point System, with the back low to the eyebrows, sides just above the ears, and the visor just above the nape of the neck. The sunglasses in this configuration were always perched high up, towards the top of the brow.
The problem with the Briko Shots was that, unless your name happened to be Mario, they looked terrible when used on a bicycle (and thus came dishearteningly close to breaking Rule #25), and as such I ran through various iterations of Briko models and spent gobs of money in my quest for the perfect pair of riding shades.
The matter has been further complicated by a related ailment: I am overcome by a feeling of overwhelming claustrophobia caused by wearing sunglasses when I’m exercising at my maximum. This was true during my ski racing career, and is still true today, whether I’m riding or skiing. If I’m hot and fighting to get enough air into my lungs, having sunglasses pressed up on my face and pushing down on my nose is a feeling I cannot tolerate. At the same time, I’m sensitive to light and wind in my eyes, and as such generally need to wear them. Without getting into this too deep, I’ll just state that it is important for me to easily and quickly take my sunglasses on and off. The problem was solved for me when ski racing by the Shots’ ability to easily, quickly, and securely get shoved onto my hat, but it has been an ongoing problem for me as a cyclist since there has never been a good place to quickly and easily store my sunglasses when I’m hot.
Until recently, that is, when helmet manufacturers started building helmets that receive the earpieces of your sunglasses with little or no hassle. Unfortunately for me, my Brikos at the time had earpieces that didn’t slide properly into my helmet and for this offense were cast aside.
Based on evidence that the Pros were able to stick the Oakley Radars into their helmets with no issue and still managed to look cool, a few years ago I decided to return to my Oakley roots and buy a pair. (White, of course. Because that’s the coolest color.) Ever since, I have been absolutely amazed at how good these sunglasses are. The hydrophobic surface coating keeps water beading off them, so when you get sweat splashed on them, can spray them with your water bottle and they clean right up. If you overheat when climbing, you can pop them into your helmet and maintain your Pro Look. The Radars are the perfect cycling eyewear. At long last, mission accomplished.
Imagine my amazement, then, when Oakley released the Jawbones. They are ugly and look like they’d be even hotter than normal sunglasses, with no open-air system between the glasses and the cheek. Besides, the dual-color version that many pros have been sporting is no good whatsoever and should be abandoned as quickly as possible.
What was the deal with the Russian guy in American Flyers, anyway? That guy was a jerk.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
These - http://www.adidas.com/Eyewear/content/products/10214/evil-eye-pro-L - may not look as cool. They may even break a Rule or 2. But anyone who (i) needs corrective lenses to be able to see where they're riding and (ii) doesn't tolerate contact lenses very well could do worse than check them out. They give all the benefits of "proper" roadie glasses (apart, perhaps, from the cool factor), but are made to accommodate corrective lenses made up to your prescription to clip inside.
@Geof
And, Kloden wears them.
Damn! Missed this one.
Glasses are almost as important to me as the bike. But... I have struggled to find glasses that I like and can afford/justify over the last 7-8years. Anyway I started off with Oakley Eyeshades because, as with most things in my cycling career, I've generally waited until expensive stuff is no longer new so that I can afford it. Also I was a massive fan of Phil Anderson. I then moved onto Oakley Razor Blades. Possible my favourite glasses ever with Purple/green iridium lenses. I was devastated when the frame cracked.
After that I ran through a series of Oakley's, ending up with some Fives, which had orange lenses and the frame was the same transparent orange colour. They were great and covered every weather condition apart from night-time.
By '00 though I needed new glasses and was on bit of a Mapei/Museeuw trip and so moved over to Rudy Project. Besides my Local Bike Shop didn't stock Oakley and I couldn't afford them. That year Museeuw wearing Rudy's with Racing Red lenses and I had to have a pair. After that I've worn Rudy ever since, mainly because on the lens colours. I don't need a full tin, Britain really isn't that sunny, but it can have a lot of dull overcast days or sunny intervals and I found lenses like the racing red ones allowed me to need only one set of glasses, except for riding at night. I was looking around for a new pair of glasses recently and was struggling to find anything other than Rudy Project that offered the lens options that I wanted. The only problem is that sometimes Rudy Project seem to employ children or drunks to design their glasses and come up with some abominations.
Anyway, there is a reason to my obsession with sunglasses other than vanity. My eyesight is appalling - for the vision deficient here, it's -11. So after riding through most of my teenage years wearing glasses, I got fed-up of trying to peer through raindrops and misted glasses so I got contact lenses. But due to my prescription I was advised on gas-permeable lenses, these had a downside that if you got dirt behind them it hurt like hell. So I needed to wear shades, otherwise I'd be no better off than when I wore prescription glasses.
@frank
I like the Jawbones, but I won't buy Oakley anymore because of their sponsorship of Armstrong.
@Jarvis
That's a mighty tale. The Eyeshades were so cool. Bauer, Anderson, Hampsten, LeMond...those lads looked proper cool in those.
I am very, very tempted to buy a pair of JawBones that match the Velominati kit. I've discussed it with our genius designer and we've settled on a color combination. Now it's up to getting it past the Finance Committee.
I have a bunch of "FLEX" money I have to spend or lose it. I would really like to get some Oakleys but my eyes are so bad that none of their models will accommodate my prescription without a lot of distortion. In fact, I am VERY limited in my selection of "sporty" sunglasses. Forget "cycling specific" and I don't want anything with an Rx insert behind the glasses so the choices of anything that will accommodate any sort of wrap is dismal. I did, however, find some Ray Bans that will work...
...With the 1/2 off lens sale at Lenscrafters they're still gonna cost me $350. But at least the frames are made in Italy!
Oops.
Older article, but I have a sunnies question. Heading into my first cx fall season and don't think I want to wear my pricey Oakley's in the woods, on the gravel, etc.
I was considering just buying a new lens for some Radars I have. But, I realized you can get Tifosis with 3 lenses for less than just the Radar lenses.
1) Anyone tried Tifosis? How is the quality, the clarity?
2) I've got a smaller face, wondering if anyone has found a pair that work well for non-Dutchman who aren't 6'6".
Tifosi seem to get pretty good reviews, positive feedback for what they are. I'd solely use mine for cross and while I'm not eagerly planning on going in face first, it would be nice if when I did I was in $60 shades, not $250.
@frank
I know this is an old thread but just saw this and that is a fucking travesty. To look like that with World Champion bands on as well, has he no shame. As a side note he sure has hell has got the chin to be a world class snooker player where he can also probably get away with his appearance.
@huffalotpuffalot
@Cyclops
haha, just choked on my Turkish Coffee!