Tyler Hamilton’s win in La Doyenne in 2003 was one of the highlights in what was generally a fantastic season. A great Spring campaign, a great Giro, a great Tour, a great Fall; unpredictable races, and closely-fought battles littered the events. But, with the luxury of 20-20 hindsight and a quick cross-reference of results listings to doping scandals, it’s safe to assume that season landed smack in the middle of an era of jet-fueled racing that rivals the 1990’s in their indulgence.
It’s a tough time to be a cyclist. Death, doping scandals, corruption in the organizing bodies of the sport. We test our athletes more than any other sport, but the tests are flawed and incomplete, and rumors persist that teams and riders pay off not just the labs to surpress positive tests, but also the UCI. Hamilton’s confession on 60 Minutes this week is the latest in an unsettling chain of events that keep peeling back more layers of the onion. I was a big fan of Tyler’s and part of me even believed in his innocence. He seemed like a genuinely nice guy – much too nice a guy to get involved in cheating. But there he was on television, talking openly about the magnitude of drugs-taking within the USPS team.
On the other hand, I’ve never been a fan of Armstrong’s. I find him to be arrogent, controlling, manipulative. His Tour wins were too formulaic; in sharp contrast to his fight with cancer, his racing showed no element of humanism. I have taken it for granted that his wins came with considerable assistance from a carefully planned and executed doping regimen. But these beliefs were woven together by a thread of doubt, and the possibility always existed that his were clean wins.
Hearing Hamilton talk of the seemingly nonchalant attitude towards doping at USPS and, in particular, by Armstrong, is surprising not in the content of the message, but in how hard the message hit. I expected the words. I had read them. I have even written many of them myself. But there was always a tangible element of speculation about them. For me, that element is now gone, and it feels strange to say the least.
Even as someone who generally accepts that doping is commonplace in the peloton, it hurts me every time another allegation of doping comes out. It takes me days to recover from it. But even if the worst happens, if Professional Cycling as we know it today falls apart, cycling will continue. Because cycling is more than watching others race bikes. It’s about racing or riding the bike yourself. It’s about overcoming your own limitations. It’s about the rider and the machine working together. It’s about cleaning, caring for, thinking about your bike. It’s about taking photos of it so you can look at it when you’re away.
Cycling rides through a storm today, but we will always have the bike. We will always have la Vie Velominatus.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@Jeff in PetroMetro
Wait, what?
Finally made my way through all the comments. TONS of intelligent opinions and words written here. Like many of you, I'm up in the air here. I like watching the PROS race, I know they are often doped up, I hope they aren't, but when we find out they are, I can't say I didn't expect it. I'd love to know the entire peloton is clean, but I'll continue watching either way. They are already on another planet than me in terms of ability, so it's not like I'm suddenly pissed they're cheating to be so good. Then again, we too ride a ton and it sucks that their talents are enhanced and we don't know what is talent + V and what is talent + drugs.
Marko:
What does inspire me on rides? At the risk of sounding trite, it's knowing there's a bunch of other OCD dickheads (read Velominati) out there in all corners of the globe doing the same thing I'm doing. Trying to have fun, stay fit, talk shit, obsess, and balance cycling with life and knowing all the while that cycling is life.
A-Merckx. I ride because it's fucking awesome & half of my best friends are cyclists. And because I'm about to buy a really slick CX bike and have the fall to look forward to. Been out of competitive sports since I graduated college, think it's time to jump back in, especially now that I'm in my thirties. And roadies tend to be too wacky, even for me.
A lot of us will keep on pushing the pedals no matter what the PROS are doing...like shoving another guy out of your way as you reach the line!
@sgt :
>>>> true dat, sgt. @frank :
I think I ran over a post of yours above that addresses some of this. I've been raise-one-eyebrow-then-move-on surprised at your vehemence against "caught" riders, considering your obvious experience and intelligence, throughout some of your articles. But if I skimmed correctly, it looks like you're seeing/accepting the light. Or dark. No, wait. Grey. It's all grey. That's not necessarily a bad thing, the whole world is grey; it means it's a complex thing. Life would be boring in black and white.
Excellent writing, as always. How the hell do you find the time??? Ride on.
@mcsqueak
Nihilists! Fu** me. I mean, say what you like about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos.
@Karolinka
I think you've misinterpreted my comments regarding Contador here as reflecting my views on doping. Read through the archives for my and the other Keeper's views on Doping.
I have openly and regularly stated that one of the great privileges of being a fan is the fact that we get to be biased and use double-standards to judge riders. I hate watching Bertie race, and with his positive test, he should be banned. But I loved Ullrich (favorite rider ever) and Pantani and if they could race today I would fully love to see it, doping or not.
It comes down to this: I liked those guys and I don't like Bertie. Nothing more scientific going on there than that simple fact.
As for Bertie, I hate that fucking guy and resent the fact that the governing bodies are too incompetent to keep him out of the races after a positive doping test. I don't hold it against him, by the way, that he is racing. He's been allowed by the governing bodies. He's allowed to race, so why not? It's the governing bodies who should have done their job and kept him out of the races. More for the fact that if he gets suspended it casts into doubt what the race would be like, and he's taking the opportunity to stand in Milano in Pink away from a rider who hasn't failed a test. (Not that they're not doping.)
Like I said earlier, what I've come to realize in the last weeks is that what bothers me is the lying - not the doping. I've advocated, in fact, for legalizing doping in the past. It's the lying and deception that ends up bothering me, and the changed results. It doesn't for me, take anything away from the spectacle either way. I'd like to see a clean sport because I believe it's possible and I think don't like the idea that they're being pressured into doping. But, if it's proven that they need to dope in order to make cycling healthy, I'd have no issue whatsoever with it.
It also needs to be said that some of my favorite races in the past have been during the jet-fueled days. The duel between Contador and Rassmussen on the Peyresourde in 2007 was quite possibly the most intense and exciting climb I've ever watched in a bike race. I was physically exhausted, just watching it. Probably my favorite climb ever, and it was almost certainly jet-fueled beyond comprehension. I don't care - still a great race and it doesn't change for me knowing that.
I don't think is all that difficult. Doping is cheating. I dislike cheating. The worse the cheating the more I dislike it. Flirting with grey areas or being a bit once or twice is very different to a deliberate, sustained, calculated and concealed attempt to regularly and materially influence results by means which are prohibited. So CERA, EPO, and all the riders, doctors, soigneurs and others complicit in their use and the concealment of their use really piss me off. Does that mean I hate all dopers? No. They are human, and I am human. Sometimes I like them. Sometimes I grow to like, or at least have a grading admiration for, them. That depends on lots of things. As Frank notes, being a fan involves a heavy element of subjectivity. But their cheating still posses me off. And I find it much harder to feel the same about someone who has cheated and is relatively unrepentant than if they hadn't doped (or been caught!). What if PEDs were legal? Well, it wouldn't be cheating, would it. But would I be ok with that? No, probably not. I don't know enough the biology to make an informed decision, but the 'donkeys into racehorses' thing worries me, as do the potential for long term adverse effects on the riders concerned - including the thousands of others (including kids) who would follow them. And while it is easy to suggest it would be no different than nutritional supplements, etc, the fact that there might be no obvious bright line to distinguish ok from not does not mean we shouldn't draw one, even if it can appear a little arbitrary, if the consequences of not doing so are unpalatable. Which I think they would be.
Believe it or not, I recently had a beer with Andy Hampsten. We met through some mutual friends at the NAHBS. Andy is one of the nicest guys you will ever meet and was surprisingly honest after I bought a few rounds of Stella. I can tell you that he cut his prolific professional career short because he was not willing to use EPO. On that same note, he felt like some of the banned substances are ridiculous and forced the riders into using other illegal substances that were more effective performance enhancers, but not as easy to detect. His take is that the entire system including the list of banned substances should be over-hauled. It's unrealistic to expect these guys to complete a Grand Tour without the benefit common pharmaceuticals such as Cortisone and common pain relievers.
On other note about the state of drugs in professional cycling...get over the past. Why is this Fuck Tard prosecuting actions that happened in the 1990s in a sport that few North Americans give a chit about. Take a look at the professional Basketball, Football or Baseball in the States and apply the same testing rules as in cycling. I'm guessing you would eliminate 50% of the athletes from competition. Fuck em. I'll still be playing hooky from work every morning there is a mountain stage on Versus when the TDF starts.
BTW-Hampsten can still bring the V.
@Netraam
I hadn't been to Livestrong dot com before. I started to freely associate about Lance. So I put in sociopath. Lo and behold. Then I started thinking along the lines of Huevo Ranchero. Surprise!
Livestrong is a fucking gold mine of weirdness as applied to LA. I thought they only provided money for research to kill cancer and to support cancer victims and their families. Obviously, they provide so very much more.
@Jeff in PetroMetro
Suuuuuurrrre. I now have a mental picture of a JiPM head to toe in Mellow Johhny (ewwwwww!) livestrong bracelets wrist to elbow tapping away furiously at the livestrong website ;)
@Tibbaustin
Fucking awesome. Hampsten was one of my all-time favorites. His V-ictory in the Giro was so tough and so classic. What a cool guy.
As for why Novitsky is chasing down LA so hard is because USPS was funded with gubment dollahs. He wants to prosecute both the use of federal dollars to purchase illegal drugs, and to find the suppliers and prosecute them, too. That's why he's doing this from the FDA. It's about the manufacture and distribution of drugs for illicit purposes.
From what I understand, this isn't really about Lance all that much. It's really about getting at the suppliers. As an example, regarding baseball, Novitsky was after BALCO. Some baseball players just happened to lie to grand juries and Congress and get their nuts caught in a wringer. They didn't have to lie. Hell, MLB didn't really have much of a banned substances list. At first, the players weren't explicitly cheating as long as they used stuff that wasn't on MLB's list.
The current LA Circus is kinda the same. And you're absolutely right. The U.S. couldn't give a rat's ass about cheating in professional cycling. It's about the use of federal dollars and the hunting down of the supply chain.