What Gianni humbly omitted from his last article is that once he finishes ranting about sock color (actually, the lack of need for any color other than than white), he recovers quickly and we wrap up the Keepers executive board meeting with him tearing our legs off on the ride home from the bar with his magnificent stroke. Because after all, he is Rule #72.
But I digress. All the chit-chat Gianni’s article generated, and the timing of it with a new shoe purchase on my end, has me ruminating on Rule #8. Matching saddle, handlebar tape, and tires is, for the Velominatus at least, quite the no-brainer as it were. The only really poignant question I recall ever being raised is whether Vittoria Open Pave’s have an exemption because they are awesome and scream hardman tire (I think they are acceptable).
But what of shoes? They are the one piece of kit that most often throws a rider’s coordination out of sync. Of course this has traditionally been fine as shoes are such a personal matter that expecting one to match one’s shoes with the rest of one’s kit is hopeful at best. That being said, I wonder if shoes are less kit and more equipment. They transfer power directly from rider to bike and thus they are mechanical, they are engineered by smart people using fancy computers, and they render the machine virtually unrideable without them. In fact, I’ve often wondered why retailers list them under “clothing” and why online review forums don’t put them under “drivetrain” instead of “clothing and accessories”.
So if you don’t accept my premise, at least humor me here. If shoes are equipment and not kit, why would anyone buy a pair that didn’t match the rest of their bike? Surely, with the abundance of shoe choices on the market these days I would think one could make every effort to find a pair that fits, has the features and performance characteristics sought, falls within price range, and matches the rest of the bike.
I happened upon this concept casually deliberately this week. You see, I’ve been sporting considerable carbone over Fi’zi:k’s new shoe line ever since they were introduced (you might say I have a thing for shoes). So when a new pair of R3’s fell into my lap for number 1 I was forced to shift the Yellow Princesses over to number 3. The yellow decals and accents on the Serotta look awesome with the YP’s and the new R3’s are oh so sublime with the BMC. Splendid, indeed.
So I’ll put it to you, the Velominati. Does Rule #8 need amending? Are shoes equipment and not clothing? Do we, perhaps, need a new rule pertaining to shoe/bike matching (I think not but a suggestion might be in order). These are the things that keep the Keepers up at night.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
Its a nice play, Marko. I rely on the philosophy that there is no detail too small to limit the justification of new purchases. So much so that it is conceivable that when I buy a new pair of white socks I may also find it essential to pick up a matching BMC Time Machine...
G'rilla rocking the stealth black - black Fi'zi:k's and black socks while Cyclops rocks the white on white S-Works w/white Castelli socks. That's about $15k worth of bikes and shoes rolling down the road.
Hey Frank, how come me picture are not uploading?
But anyway, I totally agree with you Marko, I kinda have grief with shoes that don't match everything else. So I use the old black with red trim S-Works with the black with red trim Cannondale and the new "Pepe Le Pews" with the predominantly black and white LOOK.
Its a tough call, but I got stuck overmatching-land where my frame, shoes, helmet and jersey (yes i only had one) all matched. Now with a new Bike #1 in the stable, the shoes and helmet are not in color cohesion. (the jerseys have, thankfully, diversified. The bibs are only ever black).
White/Blue shoes.... going with something simpler next time, and matching the White/black/silver beauty of Bike #1.
Nice bikes, nice photo!
I don't really try to match my shoes, just keep them either white or black so that they don't clash too much. I do have the Ergo 2s in silver and those look pretty slick when I'm on my silver Casati.
I've kind of made a subconscious move toward simple kit this year - have some really basic Mavic jerseys (which have an AWESOME cut for me), one in white, one in black. And keep my bib shorts simple as well, either all black or black with some blue.
I kind of think shoes are the one area where you are free to have some flair. The Yellow Princesses are a perfect example. Loud kit? Not really my style. But basic colored kit + loud shoes = awesomeness.
Shoe and sock debate settled
I personally have a penchant for silver shoes (aka Glass Slippers). They don't directly match my bike or any piece of my kit (except for my one of helmets). But they do deliberality casually match any piece of shinny metal on my bike, thus reinforcing the nothing that shoes are in fact equipment.
@Marko
That BMC is bangin!
@Cyclops
It depends on what you're doing wrong.