I have no dog in this fight but @Henrik does. I can’t swim in the serious ‘stache growing gene pool. And yes, it’s already Vajanuary, we left Mo’vember with nary a nod, why, because it’s stupid. Rule #50 could have included having the last name Freuler and wearing the prison stripped Atala kit as the second exception for facial hair, for he was a stud. I could be accused of putting too many photos of him on this site already and to that, I would plead happily guilty.
VLVV, Gianni
Personally I consider myself an enforcer of The Rules constantly (though admittedly with at least an effort of subtlety) correcting friends and family over issues such as how to wear their shades, sock length, or the the dreaded long-tights-short-sleeves-combination. However, complete compliance with The Rules is hard. I have on several occasions been caught with a premature aero tuck (I defend myself with the need to practice) and back in the day I have also been seen rolling around in unforgivably hi-viz jackets and jerseys.
More recently there is only one Rule that I regularly and willingly break: Rule #50. The no facial hair rule. This Rule states that the only facial hair allowed is a goatee and then only if your name starts with Marco and ends with Pantani. I have neither goatee nor the appropriate name and thus my moustachoid appearance is in clear violation.
But this transgression is not just mindless ignorance, I do have feelings about this Rule. Currently””and admittedly for quite some time””facial hair is a rarity in the pro peloton. There are of course the comedy moustache of Dave Zabriskie (which wasn’t particularly nice looking), Wiggo’s now-shaven sideburns, and the slight and youthful pencil-moustache of Lochlan Morton. Otherwise, it is a rarity (though out of competition ‘staches can be spotted regularly, see the “Movember” article on Cycling Tips). In the history of cycling, and especially in the early days, things were quite different. Maurice Garin had moustache of course, and so did many of his contemporaries. As was pointed out on Velominati, Urs Freuler wore a cyclo-stash proper thoughout his career. One could go on here but I choose not to and instead refer the reader to said article. Although there is a plentitude of historical prejudication to draw from that might instill lenience on the application of this Rule, that is not my point.
I do my best to ride all year around, in direct conflict with the place which I call home. I am a Swede currently living on the windy, and fertile plains of the south. It doesn’t get quite as cold down here as further north, but the weather is hell by any measure you choose. Every winter has snow, albeit to varying degree. Sometimes it lays around for months on end, other winters it will quickly rain away. However, since the temperature often hovers around freezing one usually will often go on rides where part of the route is snowy, part is slushy, and part is just plain wet. The relative lack of forests and flat landscape also does little to stop the winds. The summers are plenty windy but fall and winter is much worse, especially with the frequent storms. The intermediate position of southern Sweden also promises much darkness, there will hardly never be the kind of snow cover that provide some reflective light, but the days are still short, which means a lot of riding in the dark. In the last couple of weeks I have ridden in complete darkness (this is a component in almost every ride), 15 cm of snow, 25m/s winds, 1°C temperatures and relentless rain, and so on. It is impossible to stay warm and dry and one will often come home after a few hours with no sensation in hands and feet. In other words: Rules #5 and #9 comes to mind.
So the point is, one should consider The Rules not as completely set in stone, the different principles can influence one another, and compliance with some Rules can earn you the right to break others. The many hours spent freezing my nuts off, sliding across ice and slush, on dark and windy afternoons have earned me the right to sport a moustache.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
Eddy Merckx and Joe Strummer did not need facial hair. NEITHER DO YOU.
This is not me, nor do I know who he is, but he's from where i'm from. It was -34c a couple days ago.
@wiscot That would have been awesome! And maybe just a little intimidating. Either that, or he would have thought he was dealing with Baron Von Munchhausen.
@frank
Oh, but I meant not to brag but was merely making a factual claim! Erm, well, regardless of this possible second transgression, what about the principle? Compliance with certain rules is a continuous affair and comes in degrees. For other rules compliance is discrete and binary, one either complies or one don't, there is no middle ground. With continuous compliance rules the greater extent to which one complies with them, the better, naturally. So the suggestion then would be that particularly ardent compliance with "continuous rules" can earn the cyclist the privilege of being less ardent with respect to other such rules, or possibly, breaking non-continuous rules. That being said, it certainly seems that certain rules one can never 'earn' the right overlook.
As a fellow Swede I can attest to facial hair sometimes helping against blistering cold, and yes, small icicles will form after a while (from damp air, exhaled when laying down the V). These icicles could possibly be used as an alternate hydration source, other than that a hairy face really does not contribute to the work. Still, I think, if it's ok with the VMH/VMW, and you repent the rule violation, go with the mustache!
Well written!
Please don't make any changes to this rule. I'm already struggling with a student lifestyle and a festive season of free food and drink at the parents' place. Last thing I need is to be overtaken on a hill by a hulk of a woman sporting stubble, think I'd have to give up and go home right there and then.
That said, entertaining read and all the best for the winter miles!
@Weldertron That's not ice, that's just shaving foam. The lad is just about to get rule compliant!
I'll take the necessary hits for the violation. I grew my Van Dyke (goatee with a 'stache) 20 years ago. I started cycling 16 months ago. I'm grandfathering in the whiskers and keeping the facial hair.
Besides it's fun to send pictures of my Michigan winter iced hairs to my warm friends in California.
Well crafted article Henrik. Thanks for addressing this critical - to some of us - issue concerning Rule 50.
My compliance with Rule 50 has been, well, nonexistent during my adult life. While the 'exception' clause provides for a goatee if one is sleek-pated, a goatee is an atrocity in an of itself and I thus refuse such on my mug. I throw down the winter cycling glove (gauntlet) for mini-pump duel with any or all challenging my basis for non-compliance with this unfortunate rule. As a former member of the US Air Force, Mustache March (do a bit of google time for background on Colonel (later General) Robin Olds and his mustache) was well ingrained. Just before my wedding 35 years ago, I took a bit of a tumble from the bike whilst descending a mountain road (a priori complying fully with Rules 49, 55, and 85!) and struck the asphalt at about 85 to 90 kph. From the first blood marks to where I was scraped from the road was 94 metros. Massive deposit to the cycling karma account! I spent the better part of a year recovering from the broken skull, busted teeth, ground away skin and muscles, and injuries including regrowing the 'stache to cover the major gap where my lip used to be (VMH married me anyway). When Urs Freuler came on the scene shortly thereafter, it was reassuring to see a well-mustachioed cyclist. I have not been without the mustache since. Thus my basis for non-compliance.
As Henrik suggests, and MP aside, compensatory compliance with all other rules provides some additional comfort - if needed. Further, an amendment to Rule 50 might be in order.
All the best!
Winter is the season for masturbation (principle), but I'm done with facial hair. Growing some more out the top of my head for insulation during the cold season, but that's just common sense.
It's all about knowing and accepting your strengths and weaknesses. For example, many years ago I suddenly discovered that, no matter how fit I might be, a shaved head is not for short, thickly-built white guys. You accept and move on.