Last year we read that Philippe Gilbert is riding a 50cm (top tube of 535mm) BMC frame and he is 1.79m (5’10”) tall. Now it’s reported in Cyclingnews that Ritchie Porte’s Pinarello is a 46.5cm frame (top tube of 515mm) and Porte is 1.72m (5’8″) tall. He is no Nairo Quintana but somehow he is on Quintana’s old bike. Porte is just one inch shorter than the average Australian male, he is not short. And I used to think Sean Kelly’s bike was a tiny bit small for him.
Taylor Phinney was moved down from a 60cm to a 58cm frame when he joined BMC. He is 1.96m (6’5″) so it’s not a radical move, I can understand a very tall person wanting a less whippy frame, not that a BMC 60cm carbon frame is in any way loose. And they are getting the advice of people who know what they are doing, so there are some solid ideas here just ones I haven’t thought of.
What are the advantages of riding such small frames? Really, I don’t know and would like to understand. Ritchie Porte is 1.72m, rides a kid’s bike and has a 120mm stem on it, how is that a good bike fit? Has everything we learned about bike fitting been with a huge caveat: after many measurements and calculations, here is what frame you should ride but if you want to throw all that out the window and go down six centimeters, that works too. And yet, Mr Porte looks pretty good on it so tell me, oh wise ones, what am I missing?
[dmalbum path=”/velominati.com/content/Photo Galleries/j.andrews3@comcast.net/frame job/”/]
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@Darren H
There is no greater joy for the peanut gallery than to accuse someone of riding too small a frame. Believe me.
@simon
After I went as low as I am now, I found my front wheel overweighted on the technical bits as well. Then I built up my core and not I'm not just a lump on the bars; my weight is more evenly balanced and I can control how much the front wheel gets weighted, adding or removing weight as needed for the terrain.
@Chris interesting, Im on a 56 @5'10"/ I have a good amount of post and a 120cm stem, but I like the streched feel as opposed to the feeling bunched up.
@sthilzy
I had such a wicked crush on her in my teens.
I'm 5'11", and I've always ridden a 56c with an 80-100mm stem. As I get closer to n+1 again, I've been trying a few 54's, and I have it say, it has given me some food for thought.
@G'rilla
Lets also not forget that fitting and geometry principles matter less when you tend to run with your bike rather than ride it.
Good boy wearing your V-Kit in that photo.
@ScottyCycles62
In my opinion, someone your size shouldn't be on a stem shorter than 12cm. You have at least 3 or 4 cm of reach to play with, which means you can go down several frame sizes. And as @ChrisO says, they make seat pins as long as 450mm, so seat height being a problem is just an illusion.
@kixsand
I don't believe stem length has been standardized, so I don't know what length you mean. That said, 12cm is a good starting point and in my opinion should be considered the standard.
something that never gets talked about is Bar width.
@frank
Thanks for your attention to details but I thought it was obvious he rides -6 and since stem c-c measures 140 mm. I should have add - before 6 in one sentence. The fact stays right though the longer the stem the higher the bars if you use -6 stem. For that very reason I also use -17 on my bikes - it looks great and puts me in a reach I want while the bars remain low.
Another fact you should remember is you only mount the stem on + degree if your name starts with Floyd and ends in Landis.
@Nate
Thanks Nate. Is the Coni manual the big blue soft cover Italian book? If so I used to own that, loaded it to some punk and never saw it again. I bet it would fit us all to Merckx size frames, which is what I always grew up believing. He was not on a 50cm steel frame, by golly, and you kids, get off my lawn!
@TommyTubolare
+1...it must have been that bad hip.