To Look Pro is to strive to Look Fantastic and to be at our ease on a bicycle. It is to walk the line between form and function and is based entirely on the premise that the professional peloton is far more experienced in this endeavour than we shall ever be. Their lessons speak through their actions on the bike, serving as a beacon to provide us the opportunity to learn from their mistakes and triumphs. But this is a dangerous game; being a Pro does not mean one Looks Fantastic. Because of the Commutative Property of Looking Pro, Looking Fantastic does not mean you Look Pro. The Pros are our inspiration, but care must be taken to choose your muse wisely.
Looking Pro in good weather is an simple matter; bibs, jersey, (white) socks, shoes, and helmet. Tan your guns, match your kit properly, and get on with it. But when the chill sets in and layers are added, the matter becomes quite complicated quite quickly. Rule #21 and Good Taste dictate that we dress in our Flandrian Best; we don knickers or knee warmers, gillets, arm warmers, Belgian Booties or shoe covers, slip caps beneath our helmets, and hope to encounter some good old-fashioned gritty roads.
The preference for knee warmers over tights distills down to one elemental fact: no matter how one might try to disguise them, tights are simply not an attractive garment. Not on cyclists. Not on skiers. Not on overweight women at the market. Not on fit women at the Yoga studio. Not on runners, not on swimmers. Not in a box, not on a fox.
As is customary, I will leverage the powers of photography to illustrate my point. A casual glance at this particular photo shows a collection of proper hardmen rattling over the muddy cobbles of Omloop Het Nieuwsblad. It is plainly obvious that perennial hardman Tomeke Boonen was suffering from some kind of mental trauma, as he chose to don full tights rather than his usual knee warmers. These actions are not without their consequence, and you can plainly see he is ill at ease and destined to perform below his best for the remainder of the season. Eddy Boasson Hagen, in the blurry distance, suffered a similar fate and it took him until July to recover from his mistake. Boonen wasn’t so lucky, presumably because such an offense holds greater punishment for actual Flandrians as opposed to étrangers.
Then we have the others. Thor Hushovd, Lars Boom, and Philipe Gilbert all have two things in common: they all Look Fantastic, and they’re all dressed in their Flandrian Best. Hushovd has obviously already taken the safety off the howitzers, while Gilbert, if I’m not mistaken, is smirking – apparently at Boonen’s choice. Boom’s face can’t be read, but his posture is that of a Dutchman with intense Belgian aspirations.
When making decisions about how to dress for the cold and wet, keep the following points in mind.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
1994 Paris Roubaix maybe? Something like 45 finishers, Tchmil wins more crusted over than a Krispy Kreem, also I think Hincapie's first P-R.
What's the definition here... hardness of conditions ?
If it is just being a hard bastard then Tyler Hamilton and his broken shoulder in the Giro has to be way up there.
@ChrisO
I think both conditions and "hardness" have to be considered. To try and place one above the other is just asking for endless argument. (A common theme around these parts1) For example, on a dry, warm P-R there are many finishers. When the conditions are nasty, not so many, so clearly bad conditions create a special situation where the toughness of the rider comes to the fore. When conditions are good, it can be the "hardness" that comes into greater significance (Hamilton, Magni, etc)
I guess nominations with supporting facts and justification are required. Just saying Bernard Hinault, 1980 L-B-L won't cut it.
Innertube - teeth - Magni. See Rule V and note VVVV of Rule V.
@Buck Rogers
I still say that was a collaboration. But it's an awesome one.
@Buck Rogers
@mcsqueak
The homeless guy was cool but rife with rule violations. ;)
@RedRanger
Yeah, any chance to give shit to tritards is definitely a chance not to be missed!
@wiscot
Completely agree. Anything that adds to a hardman definition is included. We're talking EPICS here!
I have to admit that I really love the "cycling revealed" website and this one strikes me as a ture hardman's ordeal:
http://www.cyclingrevealed.com/Top_20_Clsscs/top20Cl_10.htm
I'm sure there's others. This is inspiring me to read and learn more of the foundations of the true hardmen upon who's shoulders we try to stand.
@RedRanger
Hopefully you told him to keep the money and put it toward a V kit. Dude has to get his f'king priorities straight!
@wiscot
We've done a few in the "Unforgettable Rides" section, but it certainly needs filling out with these ideas. Great stuff!
I suggest, though, that perhaps it was Eddy's descent of the Mente in the downpour that caused Ocana to crash. The Mente, if you've not ridden it, is a terrifying descent from that side. Let alone in the rain.