To look good is already to go fast.
-Paul Fournel, Vélo
My approach to research is pretty straight forward. First, I develop an opinion – usually in a cognitively compromised state. This is the first step in the process for the simple reason that it avoids the bulk of the hard work involving things like reading and thinking. Next, I cherry-pick evidence from my experience and what few materials I have read on the subject in order to support my opinion. Finally, I defend myself with whatever dirty tricks or facts I need to invent in order to maintain my position.
It is only on rare occasions that I will be unable to guess at the evidence I need to support my claim, but in those cases I already know I’m right, so not finding evidence that contradicts my position is almost the same as finding some that supports it. I consider those circumstances validation of my opinion and thus fortify the resolve that I’m right.
Over the lifetime of The Rules, numerous bright sparks have popped up out of the ether like some sort of internet Whack-A-Mole to point out that many of them are all about aesthetics. The point is true enough, but the Velominati have always understoodd that Looking Fantastic is the fundamental building block to finding the motivation to get out on the bike day in, day out – Rule #9 or shine. The fact that the hard work of training is what actually makes you faster is glossed over when you get excited about kitting up in your Flandrian Best, echoing the summoning of Flemish hardmen who have come before you, and using their image to inspire you to get out and lay down the V. Its basic, really.
Despite how certain I’ve always been that this is Truth and that The Rules have been handed down by Merckx from high on Mount Velomis to inspire the masses, an Austrian professor, Dr. Erik Postma of the University of Zurich, recently conducted a study to see whether Looking Fantastic really does indicate athletic prowess.
The results confirmed that Science is unnecessary when you’ve already guessed the truth, but nevertheless it is handy to have a scientific study support my assumptions in case I can’t make up facts as quickly as I need to during an argument. It also strikes me as interesting that the study found that women on the pill are about as good at identifying attractive males as men are.
Thanks to Shaka Mitchell for sending this validating study along to us.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
Love it
Outstanding image and article. I did read all of it. What's gonna happen to this sock now that we know the "look fantastic" gospel?
Good to see the Selle Italia Turbomatic 5 saddle in the right context.
This is freaky...I read the first line of the article ending in "usually in a cognitively". Then I thought "I bet this sentence ends with 'compromised state.'" Then I read the rest of the sentence on the next line.
And it did.
Maybe I should try to write an article for Velominati. Could someone provide me with the first 5 words to get me started?
I can't write 5 words.
Wow. So much bad science, or at least bad science journalism explaining good science. And yet, because of confirmation bias I'm totally on board with this confirming what we already knew to be the truth!
Great find Shaka!
I have been urged by the VMH and a couple of her fellow friends that my "long" hair makes me a sexy man beast, and I shouldn't cut it as I intend to do this spring. (Long for me is when it's in my eyes, and over my ears) Its hot as fuck in the summer and I hate it.
This article makes me want to keep it, although will it make me faster or give me some sexy man beast reputation to live up to..... that is the question....
@unversio
Slip your hand inside and use it for cleaning spokes? (Emoticon here)
And naturally, they use a pic of Faboo to illustrate the article. Point made.
BTW, who is the rider in the lead pic and is he having saddle issues? I understand that the road is very steep, but there's no way, surely, from our vantage point that we should see that much of the saddle?
Don't force it; use a bigger hammer and keep looking until all the necessary science you find supports your premise.
Very nice article.