My friend and trainee Velominata Rachel has a keen cycling eye and an inquisitive mind. While perusing the book Tour de France/Tour de Force she happened upon this image of The Badger, Bernard Hinault, sprinting for a stage win in the 1981 Tour. We know this because the caption says so. And that is pretty much all it says; no other names, no photo credit, nothing.
Of course, I wanted to know who the other protagonists are. Some research into that year’s race, and the Wickes-Splendor team pointed to one of the riders being Eddy Planckaert, who won Stage 12 (*Part B) into Zolder. The other one though? Could it be old bro Walter? (Not likely, he finished way back that day.) Sean Kelly was on the team too, and was always up for a bunch gallop, but of course it looks nothing like the Irish hardman (his legs are uglier than those, says Rachel. And by ugly, I think she means awesome). No, my hunch is it is Guido Van Calster, as he took fourth on the stage that we whittled it down to. *Stage 12 was broken into Part A (Roubaix-Brussels, 107 km) and Part B (Brussels-Zolder, 133 km), both raced on the same day.
While not really interested in who the other riders were, the thing that stood out most to Rachel was the strange lumps on the riders’ backs. Not Camelbaks (because that would violate Rule #32, and they weren’t invented yet), probably not race radio transmitters (not sure if they were around then either). Not bidons (too square), not food (why have food stuffed down your jersey in a sprint?), so what the hell could they be?
Once again, we trust in the Velominatii to decipher the clues, and feast on the pure awesomeness of another great photo.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@Dave Harding
Nice one Dave!
Interesting to note also, the previous stage to the one in question was from Compiegne to Roubaix, essentially throwing in a mini Paris-Roubaix into the race! Duclos-Lassale was 2nd, with Paul Sherwen 5th!
@ben
Thanks for the link Ben, could've saved me a lot of fucking around if I'd known about it earlier!
Great photo.
I'm voting for the sponge explanation. Flapping in the wind would not generate such a uniform rectangular shape, or the stretch marks that you can see on the jersey of van Calster.
Another remarkable aspect of this picture is that Eddy Planckaert is wearing gloves. In my book, he is one of the true hardmen of all time. He almost never wore gloves. I still recall one of the spring classics around that time when, in Belgian springtime fashion it was sleeting and everyone was suffering but Eddy was riding hard, without gloves. An inspiration to me still when I go on winter rides, 30 years later.
The picture was taken by John Pierce (of Photosport International).
At the time, all the other photographers said he was mad for attempting the shot as it's so difficult to take this type of photo from the angle he was at - if I remember he said he was stood at about 100m from the lines - but it was the photo that let him break the big time.
The humps are indeed sponges. John said it was about 37c that day with very little wind.
As an aside, John used to have an amazing collection of bikes including the Vitus that Kelly won the Vuelta on (he's great friends with the Kelly man). I've not seen him for a few years, but he's a great guy with some great stories.
From what I've read about this photo (I might be wrong): it is not a stage finish, but an intermediate sprint (hotspot). It is also 1982 not 1981.
The bit about the sponges is right though.
I think I read somewhere that the sponges were soaked in cologne to further cool the riders.
When else have you seen a Tour de France GC contender going for it in the sprints? Only Le Blaireau, I think.
@F. Maertens
Merckx and Hinault have won both the Tour and the Green Jersey, but Kelly was, provided the parcours wasn't too hilly, in the hunt for both for a few years in the 80's. Gilbert looked like a contender for the first fortnight of the Tour this year, and was mixing it up in the gallops. Very cool to see them do that.
I'm also browsing through some of my older cycling books and up to 1990, you saw GT contenders riding Roubaix et al. Riders were more well-rounded even as recently as that, and I think that was a really, really cool thing.
Merckx, in one of those books, comments that he never started a race he didn't want to win. That's why he's the Prophet.
@frank
Also, I think that Phil Anderson might qualify. Didn't he finish top five (V) a few times and he seemed to sprint for all stages as well.
Just to dredge up an old article, I've just got to the bit of Fotheringham's book on Hinault which clarifies exactly what is going on here.
It is the end of the stage, on a motor racing circuit. Hinault is not contesting the sprint at this point, he is leading out his team's sprinter. In Yellow. You can just about see Freddy Maertens' bars through Van Calster's legs; Maertens came through and won the sprint and the stage.
100% V.
@RobSandy
And that's one of the reasons I like Hinault. He knew that what goes around, comes around. You want the loyalty and hard work of teammates? Work on their behalf occasionally. Lead them out, give them a stage win. Unlike COTHO who had loyalty through fear and intimidation.
Glad you're liking the book. I thought it was great and explained a lot of what drove Hinault and why he did what he did in 86. The man was hard-wired to win when it was a race he wanted. And he wanted the 86 Tour. The only problem was he'd given his word to help Greg and that was vitally important to him to honor that. He went about it in a strnge way, but untimately Greg won.