The Rules are about cultivating a passion for riding our bikes to gain the maximum enjoyment possible. This requires humility, for one thing, and devotion, for another. It requires a balance between focusing on progress and enjoying the journey. It demands a reverence for our history paired with a hunger for evolution. The Rules teach us balance, to embrace the contradiction of opposing forces for the positive that each can bring us.
And so it could be said that The Goldilocks Principle is one of the fundamental tenets of Rule Holism. Along our journey to La Vie Velominatus, we will swing like a pendulum from left to right before we find our resting place somewhere between two extremes, whether in our training, our position, or kit, or even our very commitment to Cycling itself. No one can tell another where this balance lies; the path is for each of us to walk, we can only be shown The Way.
My STRAVA account is a good example of this. A beautifully designed service, this is a powerful training tool that lets you measure yourself against your previous performances and those of others. And therein lies the rub: since my return from Belgium, each ride I’ve been on I’ve buried the pin going after a KOM or personal best on a particular segment. This, of course, is the principle danger in training by numbers and flies in the face of Training Properly. But the tool is new to me, and I will allow myself this dalliance on the condition that I learn to cope with the pressure of having a computer that is recording my ride for future analysis. Failing that, the computer will be relegated to use only on those rides where I wish to test myself. Balance.
But the Goldilocks Principle also applies to wearing of the kit – in particular the length of sleeves, shorts, knickers, and socks. We have seen a dangerous trend of late – spearheaded by the English-speaking population of the Pro peloton, into the realm where shorts flirt with becoming knickers, socks threaten to become shin guards, and short-sleeves portend to their supposed fate as three-quarter tees.
As Velominati, it is our duty to band together and provide guidance to the rest of the Cycling community of which we are part: boundaries give us definition, and definition distinguishes us from the savages. Looking at the peloton and my peers on the road, it is clear to me that it is our obligation to issue a refresher on The Goldilocks Principle as it relates to cycling kit fit:
[dmalbum path=”/velominati.com/content/Photo Galleries/frank@velominati.com/Golidlocks/”/]
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@Nate
Boycott?? One the contrary...fly your V-Kit and show 'em how a proper jersey should look!
@frank
and a Rule #82 violation.
the difficulty with the goldilocks principle outlined here is that for the average person, we must buy our clothes off the rack and hope they fit. for some people with different body proportions (say, a longer femur, shorter forearm, etc), that gets difficult. sometimes you can work around it with bunching of lycra as frank mentioned, but how can you make sleeves shorter or longer as needed? maybe not buy that company's fit, i guess.
anyway, point is it's not always easy for amateurs. and while that's no excuse, it's at least understandable that sometimes you find shit on sale that might not be ideal but it's all you can afford; or you want to support a local/internet-based club (velominati) or ride for your local shop's race team, etc... and they only offer one fit. not much you can do.
pros, on the other hand, have no excuse for poorly fitted kit. i just read an article in rouleur on santini and how they'd spend hours for each individual rider, getting their exact dimensions and customizing their entire kit, giving them a dozen or so of each article therein. all free, of course. how do you go about having poorly fitted kit when it's customized, short of just having bad sense?
I like the RAF roundels idea. Very Wiggo!
@chiasticon
Busted but I blame the DS (William) for not wanting to wait long enough to remove the leg warmers after the Pave laid waste to the arm warmers. Ironic too as I am the originator of Rule 82
@doubleR
Positive thinking, I like it.
@Ron
He's probably riding to a start or from a finish.
@Marcus
The fact that @minion hasn't given you shit about posting this begs the question of what unspeakable things he is off doing.
@Nate
We don't speak of sheep shagging anymore?
@itburns
We've already heard about that -- I thought I might prompt Marcus's imagination for some new trans-Tasman insults.
@chiasticon
I've never actually done this, as I find my kit fits me just fine, but it can't be that hard (or cost more than $10) to get a tailor to shorten your sleeves. I don't settle for poor fit in my street clothes, and I wouldn't limit myself to off the rack fit for a bike jersey either. You won't ever get the fit of a custom made jersey, but you could get close with a cheap jersey and a decent tailor. I would NEVER think of letting a tailor do my bib shorts though, that's just akward. And I'm pretty sure my tailor would agree.
@Marko
Arm warmers and knee warmers were having a hard time staying put with all that shakin' and a-bakin' going on. More compliant approach would have been to shove them down and leave them there. But still.
The socks. We still need to talk about the socks. What is with the "6" anyway? Should be a 5, no?