I’ve never been able to decide if choices are a gift or a curse; a lack of choices introduces simplicity but also with it the risk that the simple choices do not meet the demands of a complex world. An abundance of similar choices, on the other hand, often reduces the impact of getting things a little bit wrong, but also decreases the thoughtfulness in decision making. Finally, having many divergent choices mostly just leads to a lot of planning and ultimately indecision, assuming my experience in Corporate America is anything to go by.
These days, we tend to ride bicycles with 10 or 11 speed clusters made up of sprockets that are closely matched to their neighbors. This development removes the rider somewhat from the art of gear selection, a fact carried further by bar-mounted shifters; as gradients increase and decrease, we glide from gear to gear maintaining our cadence with hardly any consideration given to the ratios hard at work for us. It is a beautiful freedom to ride like this, but it is also another degree of separation between rider and machine.
I recently read an interview with Sean Kelly, who was discussing his defeat at the hands of Greg Lemond during the 1989 World Championship Road Race. With only seven sprockets at his disposal over a route slightly too hilly for a rider of his ilk, he was faced with a difficult choice: spare the legs on the climb with a 25T at the bottom end, or hamper his sprint with a 13T at the top end.
Kelly faced a tough decision: mount a gear that would carry him over the climb to contend the finale with the handicap of a 13T, or overload the cannons on too big a gear for the climb and never have the chance to go for the win in the first place. He deliberated over the decision while training on the course and finally decided for the low gear. Kelly made it over the climbs to contest the sprint, but his 53×13 was hopelessly outmatched by LeMan’s monster 54×12.
More recently, the Cycling world was aflutter about Tony Martin’s choice to ride a 58T front chain ring during a time trail. This wasn’t a display of bravado but rather a highly refined choice of chain line: knowing the speeds he wanted to ride, he chose his big ring in such a size that would provide the straightest chain line in the gear he’d be riding in during the majority of the race. The result was less friction, and a Tour de France stage win under his belt.
There is an art to gear and cluster choice that is nearly lost with today’s expanding sprocket ranges, but it remains within our grasp if only we are willing to seek it out. Don’t settle for knowing the maximum and minimum size gears in your block; know exactly which gears you have across the board, and understand what sizes you’ll be missing and gaining when switching between 11-23, 12-25 and 13-26 – there is more to it than just taking one off one end and slapping it on the other.
It might not make any material difference to your Cycling, but it will show the quality of your character.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@SloKenny 16-20 wooh! Juvi gearing.
Dug this out from deep in the man cave,
Campagnolo 13-18 six speed aluminium straight block, double butted SS spokes laced to 28 hole Dura-Ace track hub and Mavic GEL280 rims. Tied and soldered, hence the broken spokes. The wheel-n-cluster weighs in at 903 grams with out skewers and tyres. Use to run Panaracer Comp 21's.
When I started riding again in 2010 I rode up to a gut who was test riding a bike with 11 speed. Pissed me off all the gear changing he was doing to find the right gear.
Flipping 16-15-16-17-18-15-17-16-15-19. I asked him "Gears OK?" he replied shifts Ok, but I can't find a comfy one!
Too many choixes!
@frank
Thanks Frank. If "Team America" is considered funny by the majority of Velominati, then I probably also will enjoy it - so yes. I haven't seen it (have been busy memorizing the rules) but will find it on Netflix asap.
@bear
You need to get that movie dialed in and numerous quotes memorised asap....Welcome!
Team America??? Look out, here comes "The Fry Guy"!
@minion
They were making sheep jokes... your department.
@brett Fuck they must have been subtle.
There is a lot of disdain on this site for low gearing. Quintana ran an 11-29 last Thursday. For most people high cadence riding uphill produces more power that grinding, burns more fat and less glycogen, allows quicker recovery and puts less stress on the knees and hip flexors. I'd rather spin a dinnerplate and last a few more years on the bike than succumb to a macho fantasty based on misunderstood biomechanics. Not advice, just my opinion.
@geoffrey
Just like I am not Ullrich, you are not Quintana. You should ride the cadence that suits your physiology.
You're not wrong, but keep in mind that while I'm not accusing Quintana of anything because spinning could well be his magic way of riding especially considering his size, spinning for big riders is an artifact of blood-doping where it is more important to save the muscles than the cardiovascular system knowing you could just stock up on new blood every few weeks.
Side note: there's no disdain around here for low gears; we're just taking the piss. We only joke about it because we'd rather spin a 53x11 up a wall at 100rpm than a 22x28. That is all.
@minion
It had to do with mispelling and people smarter than me. I had to google it before I got the joke.
@frank
EPO also has a huge impact on endurance, but not so much on power, so spinning putting the load on the cardio-vascular system makes the most of this, too -- I think David Millar wrote about this in his book.
@geoffrey
Don't forget to pack your sense of humour!