I just came across Alexi Grewal’s website; presently he is a timber framer, does not own a car (no money), hauls tools behind his bike in a trailer and is now training up to revive his racing career. That is a heavy lift, reviving that career. That is a twenty year holiday from riding and racing but I never discount an elite athlete’s will. (Floyd, how’s it going?) I bet against Alexi once, I won’t do it again. He is gunning for the Quizno’s Pro Challenge this next year.
Summer Olympics 1984 in Los Angeles, the American cycling team was deep into a then legal autologous blood transfusing program. Had Grewal not been estranged from the rest of the US team he may have been transfusing too. Alexi was no angel nor ever claimed to be.
The point of this article is his account of his Olympic victory, lifted from his very interesting blog. It’s an unvarnished look into the competitive soul. Alexi was there to win the gold medal for himself, not for the USA, not for the team. I can’t criticize that. The point is winning.
For the team coach, it’s the balancing act Franco Ballerini had to perform every year for the selection of the Italian Worlds team. How many highly ambitious Italians does it take to implode a team effort? Sure an Italian might win, or the world gets to watch Italians chasing each other down – and that damn Spanish guy wins again.
I watched this monster race from the edge of the couch at my eventually-to-be wife’s apartment. I couldn’t believe Grewal even made this final selection. Once Steve Bauer and Grewal were in a two-up break heading for the line, I repeatedly pronounced (to any neighbor within shouting distance) Bauer to be the ultimate winner. I’m lucky I wasn’t living in England with a beer- soaked betting parlor a quick sprint down the street- I’d have bet and lost a lot of money. Bauer was strong as hell and could sprint like a demon…and yet Grewal outfoxed him. Grewal knew Bauer all too well and he did what he had to to win. Was it smart, obviously. Was it sporting? Well, he won. Should Bauer have sat up and risked being caught? I would love to hear Steve’s side of this as it must haunt him still.
What you see on TV is one thing, what you read from the winner twenty-five years later is something else all together.
Titled The Skinsuit, by Alexi Grewal
Before we get too far down the road, there is a story I must tell. It is a story I have already shared with Davis Phinney, my main rival then and always. But now I will tell it for all.
The story of the Los Angeles Olympics, from my perspective. First off, I did not stay with the team before the event, because of my positive test for ephedrine at the Coor’s Classic I ended up flying out to L.A. on Len Pettyjohn’s dime with my own support crew. So what ever did or did not happen with the blood doping scandal of those days I had no part of it.
I rode my bike to the start. With Len Pettyjohn carrying my spare wheels and bottles. When I got there it was tense. My instructions were simple, ride for Davis, I said fine, except that I told Eddy I would be going solo late in the race. He said ok. That was the race meeting for me, the first time Eddy and I had spoken in months.
In the race however and in my mind and prep I never gave one thought to really giving away my chance. I was there to win, it was all I knew at that point in life.
Once the race started, of course there are duties you must do, play your part in the race be present to observe and watch the front. On the very first lap I had worked myself up to the transition zone at the front, the place where you have to choose to follow moves or stay put. At the top of the first long climb both Ron Kiefel and I were present when a string of riders worked itself free as the climb crested and the road turned fast. We both looked at each other. For a second, I am sure neither of us really wanted to be exposed that early in the race. No matter his demeanor Ron Keifel wanted to win just as much as anyone else. I have always considered him a hard man to beat.
He hesitated, we were in equally good positions to respond. Intuition told me to go, so I wound it up, saving my legs as best I could and made the effort to bridge and join. The second I got there I knew it was good. A free ride with the likes of the Austrian Helmet Weshelberger in the move and willing to drive it.
From that point forward a certain rhythm was established. I was up the road ahead of the other favorites with the exception of Helmut. I did not have to work and I only had to follow one man. The latitude was there to let him go also. It was more or less the perfect place to be in. I knew it. I was not thinking what I could do to help Davis, I was thinking how I could use the situation to work all my rivals against each other, and conserve my legs which were marginal.
I am an observant bike racer, the tension on the U.S. team was visible. Thurlow was ashen, Kiefel was quiet, Phinney was wearing a skin suit. There was no doubt in my mind Keifel and Phinney were gonna be good. The skinsuit was information I filed away. Only one pocket was sewn into it and we faced a hot, hilly two hundred kilometer race. One feed zone per lap on a downhill, right near the start finish, wearing a skin suit with one pocket was to rely on the unreliable.
Since I came with my own support, Arnold set up in the neighborhood days before the event. We had a chosen spot in the crowd on the long hill. A bottle would just come out of the crowd in Arnold’s hand to mine whenever I wanted it. The team feed zone was just gravy for me. I was never without what I needed, ever. Call it cheating, or call it good planning. It covered my bases.
The early break progressed. At no point was I stressed. I rode up Vista Lago at my own pace in my lowest gear in the early laps and only took token pulls. Memories blur a bit. But somewhere around fifty miles into the race, after a nice long free ride, the break started to splinter, the strong guys wanted to go and the others had already seen their glory. Helmut accelerated and Raul Alcala followed him up the hill past the feed. Helmut beckoned and asked me to come on. I deferred, there was a long way to go and I did not feel up to squaring off with him in a suicide break.
Half a lap later the lead chasers caught us. Bauer got there first, and looked good. Phinney followed up just shortly after, and looked like anyone who had to follow a Bauer move that day. Strong yes, worried a little. You could tell he had fired one bullet already.
It wasn’t a kilometer later that another move went. Easy for me to penetrate, not so easy for Steve and Davis. Another free ride for me , followed by another bridge from the field for the favorites. Bauer again the antagonist. Davis again controlling him.
Before you knew it, it was late in the race. 80 miles were gone. Then a crucial moment that changed the makeup of the race. Little splits were happening, Davis and one of the Norwegian’s; Dag Otto had a little gap. I was at the head of the field, and noticed Keifel out of position to respond, still hesitant.
And here is where it gets sticky, my motive. Sure it was a good time to go. But it was also the best time to separate Ron from Davis. You know if I come to line with Ron and Davis, I am obligated to lead them both. I can hear my thoughts to this day, “put Ron away now”. And I did, I punched it, bridged to the move and we drove it. Morten Saether made it with me as well as a Columbian.
As we looked back from the rise of the Start Finish Bauer came busting out of the field with Thurlow on his wheel. The die was cast and the break was free. There would be no catching us. To that point in the race I had never had to test myself not even once.
In the break everybody rode, Davis harder than anyone. Two laps to go Davis asks me for food. I lied, said I don’t have any, I justified it in my mind by thinking I might need it myself. But really I knew it all went back to the skinsuit. One pocket Davis, it is not enough. I believe all it would have taken for Davis to have won the Olympics was to have worn a jersey and carried enough food. He was riding good, really good. But I had other plans. He was my rival above all others and his mistake was not to be overlooked.
Prior to this point the tactic was circumstance. When Keifel hesitated on lap one, I was obligated to cover. It set in motion the entire race. I was covering the front they were covering the favorites and Bauer. If I had ended up with Davis at the Line I would have ridden for him, the same way I covered the early move. It would not have been my first choice, things seldom are. But he was the last person I wanted to see at the finish, and when he ran out of food his blood was in the water. And we both knew it.
On the second to last time up the long hill, remember it is now late in race, and it was a race of attrition, you just gradually get tired. Morten Saether the stronger of the two Norwegian’s punched it hard. Normally it would be my job to respond, and I even think I tried, but Davis unselfishly beat me to it and I followed him in a very hard acceleration to control the Dane. It hurt me, and it also woke up my legs, first hard move all day. In the middle of the hill my legs came to life, and for the first time that day I found a real rhythm. I settled in moved to the front and let it drive.
Toward the top of the hill I was comfortable in full tempo, first adrenaline all day. On my wheel was Davis, on his wheel Bauer. Davis had stayed in a low gear, legs blurred fast and breathing hard. Good for saving himself not so good for responding to another move. I saw it and knew it was time to go, Davis would not stay exposed for long. So I attacked, knowing Bauer would follow and drive it if there was a gap. And he did. It strung out everyone. Everyone’s weaknesses were exposed and Davis was put in the position of having to really extend himself in an inopportune time. That move and the almost identical one that I pulled on Vista Lago earlier in the same lap was enough to take advantage of Davis while his body was switching to his reserve tank.
It was enough weakness for Bauer to see and he tried a counter; I saw it and caught his wheel, countered his counter and went one more time. I was free. You saw that on TV.
It was a simple strategy, put Bauer up against Davis all day. I did not really plan it, but once I saw it, it was easy to have it repeat itself again and again. One the crucial penultimate lap I drew Bauer out myself. He would catch me and drive it. And I had a free ride, while Davis, my teammate was strung out in the chase.
On the last lap in the feed Bauer attacked while Davis was taking fuel. There was no bringing him back that time. And I was up the road waiting for my free ride.
As a rider Davis never hesitated, never was selfish and would always do more than his share of the work. This is the real story of how I beat him. It was not heroic.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@Oli Brooke-White, @Pedale.Forchetta
Well put, @Pedale.Forchetta. It's the ethic, and I also agree with @Oli Brooke-White that he didn't do anything wrong, strictly speaking (as I said).
It's just that I admire the riders who demonstrate an ethical sense more than I like those who don't. A rider's attitude makes a massive impact on who I choose to be a fan of and who I don't; those he seem to reflect my own philosophy and attitude are my favorites, others I may admire for other subjective or irrational reasons, and other I dislike purely because they project something that I don't like. Like Cavendouche; he's a great rider and generally doesn't do anything wrong. But he's a prick so I decide I don't like him. It has nothing to do with whether or not I understand top-level racing. It's a subjective decision that we have the privilege to make as fans of cycling.
Did he deserve the win? Sure. Was it a great race? Yes. Was he the smartest rider there? Yes. Did he do it ethically? Gray area at best. And, what's more, I think he agrees with me, just look at his final statement about heroism. He knows he was the smartest rider in the race but he was morally off, and that's his motive for writing this piece.
@frank
Yes, actually his last statement says it all. I'm with you Frank.
So selfishness is what he's being criticised for? If Phinney wanted to wear a skinsuit that didn't allow him to carry enough food I would suggest that's entirely his fault; why should Grewal have given him his own carefully planned out supplies? To use a mild lie like that is no worse than missing a turn or two on the front IMO, and it's at the very low end of "bad sportsmanship".
@ Pedale.Forchetta - I have ethics and principles too, but if I had food and someone who could have but didn't asked me for mine I'd feel no obligation to give it up, especially if it would make the difference between being there at the finale or not.
And I take his last paragraph to be more a statement of fact - if Phinney hadn't worked when he didn't have to, if he'd maybe measured his efforts better and if Grewal didn't want to protect his own food supplies perhaps Davis could have won. I think the call about being heroic is more a view on bike racing being about taking care of such details than any sort of poetic heroism. I think that's up to us to decide...
@Oli Brooke-White
This conflict is what I found so interesting about Alexi's story. If you accept a team ethic, can you lie to a teammate to win? I'd call that underhanded. Phinney obviously was insane to wear a skinsuit but winning at what cost?
I'm no racer so I can't argue this directly but I still would hope I wouldn't lie to a teammate.
I'd be interested to hear Phinney's opinion, though I think the ethical high ground is all very well in principle but not so clear in fact. The worst I can think of Grewal is that he was perhaps a bit selfish. It's a fantastic story, regardless.
@Oli Brooke-White
I'd like to be clear on that, I'm not judging Grewal as a person/cyclist, I'm judging his behaviour in this specific story from his own very words:
"Two laps to go Davis asks me for food. I lied, said I don't have any"
That's it.
The great thing of ethic is that no one oblige you to have one nor to stick to it.
But it's precisely in cases like this, real cases,
that you can be for a moment a 'plus man'.
Grewal was great in revealing this story.
@Gianni, @Oli Brooke-White, @Pedale.Forchetta
Hellsyeah. A-Merckx. And thanks, Gianni, for posting!
Here's three alternative scenarios:
1. John Gadret: "One hill to go and Roche asks me for my wheel. I lied and said I don't have one."
2. John Gadret: "One hill to go and Roche asks me for my wheel. I said piss off."
3. John Gadret: "One hill to go and Roche asks me for my wheel. I said bugger - OK."
Yeah, yeah, I know - totally different scenario, can't equate them, etc. All true. But I know which John Gadret I'd want on my team.
What if Roche was riding on 160g silk track tubs?