Cycling is hard; I’m not leaking any trade secrets with that statement, but it feels good to say it anyway. No Cyclist avoids suffering, but of those who venture into our world, there are some who seek to limit it while others choose to embrace it. Then we have a handful of characters who consider playing Whack-a-Mole with the Man with the Hammer to be good sport, particularly when playing the part of Mole.
In the current climate, it’s impossible not to consider the impact doping has on our sport. I, for one, have happily watched professional bike racing and delighted in the spectacle for close to thirty years, aware to varying degrees that doping is part and parcel of that spectacle I enjoy so much. In the last decade, I’ve gone so far as to assume most – if not all – riders are doping; a regrettable situation but one which has done little to temper my enthusiasm for the sport. After all, when all the riders are doing it, then surely what we’re watching is a level playing field of willing participants who understand how the game is played. Cheaters cheating cheaters hardly seems like cheating.
It’s all beautifully romantic so long as all the riders are doping. This is not the case, however; there are those who are racing clean against dopers. These riders are truly being cheated out of a livelihood by a culture which not only turns a blind eye to cheating, but who ostracize those who don’t. These riders who refuse to dope have few voices and last week, the sport lost one of the most forward of these with the retirement of Nicole Cooke.
Nicole has been a force in Women’s Cycling since turning Pro in 2002. A powerful rouleur, she excelled in every terrain and in any race format, but was nigh unbeatable in uphill finishes, taking a total of three La Fléche Wallonne Féminine titles, each of which required such a large laying of The V that it brought her to collapse. I was aware of her as much as anyone can be with the state of the coverage of Women’s Cycling, but she became one of my favorite riders after reading a piece in Rouleur about my favorite hub manufacturer, Royce. In the article, Royce’s Cliff Polton described being at a trade show when a young girl better described as a ball of loosely-contained energy bounded up on his booth and started asking about bottom bracket axles and wondering aloud if he could help her achieve her goal of becoming the wolds most dominant female cyclist.
Given what I understand of her personality, I get the feeling it was more like executing a plan than achieving a goal.
Cooke raced at the top of her sport for thirteen years; she scaled the heights of achievement with wins in every major race on the calendar including the Ronde van Vlaanderen voor Vrouwen, La Fleche, the Giro d’Italia Femminile and Grand Boucle (women’s Tour de France), the Olympic Road Race, and the World Championship Road Race. What’s more, she accomplished it while remaining staunchly anti-doping to the point that she faced sackings for refusing doping products.
Anyone who is a fan of Cycling should read Nicole’s retirement statement – I could never do it justice here. My personal hopes for the Pharmstrong Legacy is that it yields a a blood letting in the UCI and that the energy it spends on covering up its own corruption goes instead into promoting Women’s Cycling.
I’m sad to see Nicole go. Yet, for a rider who thrived in the hardest conditions and who unyieldingly stuck to her principles, I find it very fitting that the final two wins of her career came in Stages V of the Giro Femminile and Energiewacht Tour, respectively. Bravo, Nicole.
Here is the finale of her last Giro stage win:
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
Regarding supporting women's teams I'm afraid individuals buying stuff isn't going to make much difference. It might be more effective if you could each get a few hundred people to use their FB page or something like that, although just liking it doesn't do much either unless they are active on it.
Male cyclists are not Lulu-lemon's target audience - I gather they are a women-specific sports clothing brand, so actually you probably don't matter one bit to them unless part of their strategy is to target partners/husbands, but I doubt that.
And this is the problem. It's all about reaching audiences. Frank is half-right about return on investment but one is the objective and the other is the measurement - like saying it's about the distance not the kilometres. Target audience is one of the main ways to measure your ROI.
When Jonathan Vaughters says to Garmin "You will get ROI of $30 million by sponsoring this team" he is using ratings points to measure it. Obviously product sales are the ultimate strategic goal but targeting audiences is the tactical way to achieve this and they will perceive a causal link, otherwise how do they know what generated the sales.
The ratings are actually referred to as the currency in an advertising market. An advertiser (and agency) plans a campaign which says "To achieve sales of A I need ratings of B in the target audiences of C, F and Q." They buy airtime (or print space, or outdoor etc) based on this. The media owner doesn't (usually) sell 100 ad spots, they sell 100 target ratings points - if that comes in 20 spots or 200 spots isn't the main issue.
The only difference is that sponsorship is earned not bought, but it is still measured the same way.
And so this brings us back to the problem for women's cycling. If you are a company targeting male fans you get everything you need from male events. The same people, in smaller numbers, watch the female events. OK the sponsorship is cheaper but the Reach (the number of people exposed for minimum time) is Duplicated. Yes you increase the Frequency but that has limited value if you've already reached your target. To succeed, women's cycling needs to develop incremental Unduplicated Reach i.e. find women to watch or men to watch differently to male cycling.
That's not impossible but we're talking about a branding and marketing effort on a large and sophisticated scale here. Something like Formula 1. Even if the UCI wasn't run by muppets it would be a tall order, and the doping scandals would have pulled the rug from under it anyway. They could siphon off sponsor money by making women's squads mandatory or re-allocating proxe moeny but then sponsors will complain they are not getting the ROI - vicious circle and I don't see it changing anytime soon.
@Tobin
now max and ruby I know from my kids. but feel free to flash the Assos woman at any time. and we still aren't surprised that you and @scaler911 are talking about males in tutus. Now don't get him and mcsqueak started on the cute kitty and bunny pic thing. the site just mite crash...
@Marcus
Fuck! What next? Fat Pat admitting he took a massive bung from Lance and stepping down?
@Marcus
This was exactly what I was after with my earlier post, the Aussie chip on the shoulder coming to the fore and getting nationalistic about it.
@Marcus
I quite like the TDU and it is improving over previous years when it could have been described as a collection of sprint races run on consecutive days but there seems to be something fundamentally wrong with stages as short as 116km or bulking a stage out to a massive 135km by making the riders do the same bit six times in a row. The other thing that has no place is the amount of time the spend cutting to the tourist board footage of artisan markets and other twee shit while Phil rambles on about how many romantic times he and Paul have had there.
Anyway, that's all bye the bye as I'm just bitter about thought of anyone riding their bikes around in fine weather at the moment.
@scaler911
Now that I've lived in Straya I've come to appreciate Marcus' cuntbag eloquence a lot more. You meet people on the street all the time who talk like this (since I live in Canberra they're called politicians) without the careful reasoning or the citation of an occasional fact. While Marcus may have all the charm of a single, inbred 4 toed dingo farmer who last saw a woman in the 1960s, and a bar of soap in the 1950s, I have to concede that he may occasionally have a point.
@Chris don't try to be friends now you Pommy cunt
@Marcus
You lot use cunt in the same way that you use mate, without the benefit of pronunciation it can be hard to tell whether its a term of endearment or an insult.
Don't worry though, I managed to make it through four years of living in Australia without making any friends so I don't see why I should let my guard down now.
@Marcus
Fuck yeah! Now that's how we pass the time until the real foookin racing begins, not this loser amateur shit that they try to fool us with since we have been without a race for three months!
When's MSR again?
Don't know where else to put this, but it's worth a few moments of your time. Nice pr or the truth? You choose. Love the initiative of getting into Euro cycling though. Methinks beneath that placid exterior is someone willing top give Clenbutador a real test. http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2013/jan/25/chris-froome-sky-tour-de-france
@Chris
ha ha, yes, in Scotland they use the C word as an adjective too, as in "I got a cunting puncture today"
@Marcus
Zamboni racing is fuckin ace, dont knock it.
And aye, we are all jealous of the warmth, at 6am here right now its still 2 hours till it gets light and there is a foot of snow on my car right now, so it's really a moot point. Lucky sheep shagging bastards !