While the The V Moment of the Year is the moment during the season when the sport demonstrated the most pure example of spirit of The V, the Anti-V Moment of the Year similarly acknowledges the moment in which all those things that make The V great were ignored. This is more than just cheating or climbing into the broom wagon; this is reserved for under-handed tactics, or wheel-sucking to the win, complaining about dangerous descents, canceling races for bad weather.
The Anti-V is a virus. It starts small, as a nagging doubt perhaps about form or willingness to suffer that day. It replicates and feeds on itself; giving in to doubt is easier when you’ve done it before, and the more you do it, the easier it gets. It manifests itself in an absence of those things we love most about cycling: a combination of guts, class, and panache.
Before I go any further, I’d like to point out that we had even more trouble deciding on the Anti-V moment than we did the V Moment. Bretto made the case for les Fréres Grimpeur, but couldn’t dial in on a specific incident of Anti-V and kept repeating, “Every time they looked around, or when they mounted their TT bikes!” We did the only thing we could do, and had CERN crunch the data for us. They confirmed the Schlecks spent the equivalent of three full weeks rubbernecking and nearly a quarter as much working on their time trialing – too much to mathematically isolate a single moment. Sometimes the best decision in the midst of indecision is simply to make one, and that’s exactly what I did.
At the very instant when Johan Van Summeren was doing a reverse 270 cannon ball into the deep end of the V-Pool to bring us the V Moment of 2011, Jonathan Vaughters was clutching his shoulders as he gingerly waded into the kiddie pool – dragging a handful of race favorites with him.
The race was shaping up beautifully for Garmin-Cervélo. Van Summeren had read the race and left the favorites at the Trouée to join teammate Gabriel Rasch up the road in the day’s breakaway. The plan was to keep Johan in reserve at the front while the Garmin team worked to bring the break back, giving Thor Hushovd an armchair ride to the finish with the considerable advantage of having teammates in the finale. A beautiful plan, and I love it when a plan comes together.
But Garmin’s firepower wasn’t quite enough to bridge up in time, and Faboo wasn’t thrilled about the prospect of riding into Roubaix with Thor getting a leadout from three teammates. In typical style, he took the race into his own hands and left the others to their own devices. Hushovd, Flecha, and Ballan came along for the ride and the four made huge inroads on the gap with Cancellara doing the bulk of the work.
And here the sticky tentacles of the Anti-V set in. Faboo started doubting whether he should really be hauling such a fast finisher as Hushovd up to his teammates and sat up when the gap had gone down to within arm’s reach.
At this point, Garmin’s plan wasn’t as solid as it had been a few dozen kilometers before:
The plan was in need of some quick-thinking to maintain the upper hand, and everyone knows driving while strategizing is dangerous. So, for safety reasons, Vaughters called in Garmin’s pocket Timid Tactician: His Turtleneck Sweater. New plan:
Cancellara, Hushovd and Vaughters all had their hand in making this the Anit-V Moment of the year, but Vaughters takes the bulk of the blame not only because his was inflexible and unimaginative thinking, but because he was playing both sides: the rider up front can’t work if he’s got a rider coming up, or the rider coming up can’t work because he’s got a rider up front. Pick one.
But worst of all, there is nothing more Anti-V than two riders within a chance of winning riding along gesturing to each other as they both refuse to take a pull for fear of dragging the other to the win. Certainly, a rider must be sure not to do too much work and place themselves at a disadvantage, but this should never come at the risk of losing the opportunity to win the race in the first place; I’m sure we can all agree it is much more in the spirit of the V to fight and get beaten into second place than to never fight at all and throw your chance away. In this, Cancellara and Hushovd each had a hand in the pie, but Vaughters and his Sweater were were the masterminds behind the stalemate.
We truly love what Vaughters is trying to do with Garmin by making it their mission to race clean, but racing clean is no excuse for uncorking an entire case of Vintage 2011 Anti-V. Vaughters races his team like they are weak with nary a chance to win, when in fact they are one of the strongest teams in the sport. It is time to wrap the bars in white tape, set aside the underdog tactics, and start racing like leaders. And by all means, fire the Sweater.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
The universe must be upside down. Oli agreeing, I have an Orange v symbol for arguing with the site's founder, and I'm trying to defend JV's tactics after Flanders. Madness!
@JC Belgium
Thanks, I thought it was more cursing I should learn.
@minion
And thanks minion, those articles confirm to me JVS was a worthy winner, Vaughters did the right thing and Frank's man-love of the Schlecks has clouded his otherwise brilliant mind.
I think the point is being missed. I could be wrong but for me the anti V-ness of it all is not the tactics or if JV was right or not. It's the whole little affair of the chitchat at the car. Faboo cries to JV that Thor won't pull, JV probably in a very creepy spineless way defends Thor..Thor pathetically like a little kid says nothing and has JV talk for him. The whole thing is pathetic. That's what is anti v. That everyone is whinging instead of riding.
made all the more undignified given the Rainbow Jersey....
JV can say whatever the hell he wants to Cancellara. He has no obligation to do any of it. If I was in JV's shoes, and Cancellara came to the car and told me he wasn't going to drag Hushovd to the finish line, I'd laugh in his face and tell him he'd just lost the race. Of course that might be the best example of why I shouldn't be a DS, but there you go.
I lie like a scalded politician when I'm racing to come 19th out of 25. Whatever was said between JV, Thor and Cancellara doesn't mean much in the long run.
@Dr C
Exactly!!!
@JC Belgium
I have seen pros crash over and over and over and over again...yet it always amazes me that they just shake it off and climb back on. Those of you who have crashed at race pace know why...
@Oli
Exactly. If he had done that, there wouldn't have been an Anti-V moment!
@Chris
Wrong year...?
@paolo
A plus fucking one. Exactly.
From the second paragraph (I don't think anyone reads the articles?)
@minion, @Gianni
Its easy to change the story after the fact and backpedal. His comments during, immediately after, and then a while after the race gradually changed to best reflect the team. What happened on the road - and what the Anti-V Moment is about - is a different matter altogether.
My Merckx its good to have an healthy disagreement out here again, after all the agreeing that's been going on around here lately.
@wiscot
The hot day was stage 1, this pic was taken on the way back from stage 2 where the weather was much kinder.
Regarding the dude in orange & white, he'd be one of the regular punters, the upside of the TDU being based out of the one place in the middle of the city is that for the stages that finish reasonably close to town (e.g. stage 2) the pros generally just ride back to town & are happy to cruise back chatting with the fans that are doing the same.