Despite being a bald, visually challenged Velominatus, I envy only one other man from the peloton past. The only man who could pull off the historically near-impossible chrome-dome/ponytail combination, and couple it with a pair of wire-rimmed reading glasses yet still manage to exude a lethal concoction of Gallic style, hardness and pure V that could defeat opponents with its very presence.
Even the cobbles here in the 89 Paris-Roubaix are being blown dry by the force of The Professor’s big ring whirlpool, floating millimeters above the surface and forcing the rider he’s just passed into a muddy pit of broken stones while he continues his assault down the middle, on the crown.
Though he rode for teams with some of the most unflattering kits ever, The Professor always managed to look immaculate. This is just another example. He was a template for The Rules long before any notion of them was ever dreamed of. Except of course Rule #36, which he naturally transcends and earns him an automatic pass on account of his sheer badassness.
I’m tempted to dig out my very first pair of prescription specs, similar to these and which I would’ve acquired around that time, and rock them in honour of Le Prof on our Roubaix ride on Keepers Tour 13 next April. The ponytail, well I’d be wise to not attempt that one…
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@LA Dave
That TT was only 25km, kinda short for a non-prologue. How many similar length ones have there been? Lemond was probably pretty motivated for that one as well.
@DerHoggz,@Oli, @DerHoggz, @Mikael Liddy,
I agree with you guys, and I hate that I feel compelled to have these thoughts, but it's so hard (impossible?) not to. Especially when I look at that photo of the Professor crushing that Pave, he seems unbeatable steroids or not.
For me I can honestly say that I don't know of one of my cycling heroes that I would be willing to bet my house that they were 100% clean...and that's a bit sad. (Although if I had to choose one, Hampsten would probably be the guy)
Still love the sport, always will. I'll be watching every cyclocross world cup this winter to hold me over until things get rolling with next years Tour Down Under. Holding out hope that all of this mess can lead to a new day of clean racing... Holding out hope, but not holding my breath.
Forgive me if I fail to adequately make my point, but I'm a very distracted man of late and really don't feel like dealing with this shit right now... that said I really feel I need to comment on this latest trend I've seen popping up lately over Lemond, his TT performances, and doping.
LeMond was a sample size of 1 (n = 1). It's difficult to quantify the sheer magnitude of the difference in performance potential between two professional endurance athletes where one measures out a relative VO2 of 90+ vs. the more commonly average (for a professional) in the mid-low 80's. Assume all other variables being equal, like pedaling efficiency, equipment, biomechanics, diet, sleep, mental fortitude, etc... the higher relative VO2 will dominate.
Analyzing LeMond requires a complete analysis of his performance history (not just a snap shot of otherworldly performances)... only then can we see his linear performance progression for what it is. Legit. LeMond didn't come out of nowhere... he was ripping through history like a freight train as a junior rider and on an undeniable path to immortality before real life bit him in the ass. LeMond is a true one-off in the purist sense of the phrase. Without the hunting accident, and the "no go" of 1985 it's hard to argue against the reality of him being the first (if not only) man to have won more than five TdF races.
The record setting TT was a perfect storm in favor of LeMond... It was short (24 km), net down hill, had a strong tailwind, and LeMond rode superior equipment. Factor in the relative VO2 of 90+ (which allows for faster recovery following repeated bouts of intense exercise) and it stands to reason that the man with that kind of physiology would eventually leave his mark on history.
Cheating w/PED's, advances in technology, and the ultra-rare race distance have allowed average professionals to creep closer, but at the end of the day, the average pro with the average pro relative VO2 can't bridge a gap of the magnitude difference that exists between nearly 10 ml-kg... LeMond is the only rider to have those physiological numbers officially, and it makes perfect sense that he's the only rider with a performance like the record setting TT so often used to make the argument that he must have doped.
I believe LeMond is legit. The totality of his performances support that belief as does the science. A true one of a kind...
Fignon wore a "skillet" like no other. A "Skillet" is similar to a mullet, but with non-stock (hairless) surface and a handle (ponytail).
@JFT
I believe LeMond is legit. The totality of his performances support that belief as does the science. A true one of a kind...
- You make great points. I'm familiar with this info, it's well documented and I have used it to convince myself (and some of my Lance touting friends/acquaintances) that there was nothing to his performances other than him being "Le Man". But the same way I had always had that bad feeling about Lance and his wins, I simply can't shake the doubt that exists, no matter how small the chance or how little I believe it (or want to). And it's not just him. When I was standing in line at Interbike this year waiting to get The Big Migs autograph (there's only a few riders I would do that for, he's one of them) I couldn't help but wonder about him also. Such is life for cycling fans in these current times.
@LA Dave
I just cannot believe that you would sit in a press conference and point out the problems with doping and even espouse and effective way of testing for it, the way LeMan does in this press conference to Armstrongs face if you had any skeletons in the closet...that would just be suicidal.
I have to say I believe him and what's more the suggestions he makes about using baseline VO2 Max as a measure seems to make sense. If it is genetic and does not alter with age then surely it is the purest test of all and sounds pretty much infallible....in addition he is proposing a solution that would actually catch himself out if it were taken up. Balls of steel to face COTHO down in public, I bet LA was fucking fuming at this and wanted to gouge his eyes out...Chapeau Greg!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryH650Br8uI
An interesting visual presentation of some data:
More here: http://www.phys.washington.edu/users/savage/Cycling/LookingAtTheData/AIC.html
funny tagline from The Race Radio's twitter page:
"Pro Cycling is like sausage, I love it but I don't want to know how it is made."
@frank
Yes, unfortunately these banners were all over the Q8 gas stations which, consequently, are all over Belgium. I had to do a double take on my way home from work one day when I saw this. Disturbing...
@il ciclista medio