Changer de Braquet

The classic gear lever

Some people are supremely good at it, reducing complex situations into matters of simple black and white. This isn’t my particular area of expertise; I enjoy wading through the pools of ambiguity a bit too much to go about bludgeoning this beautiful world into absolutes. In fact, I would venture that delighting in nuance is part of what distinguishes La Vie Velominatus from the simple act of riding a bicycle.

I’ve spent the summer wrapping myself in the Rules handed down by the Apostle Museeuw during Keepers Tour 2012, with particular emphasis on Rule #90. Climbing Sur la Plaque is a cruel business, rising upwards under the crushing weight of physics as you fight to maintain your rhythm and momentum. At first, it’s a struggle to maintain speed on the smaller climbs as you learn how to change your pedaling action to compensate for changes in gradient. You focus on loading the pedals and forcing them around; the moment you lose the rhythm, gravity sinks her claws into your tires and tries to drag you back down the hill. On the other hand, if you maintain your cadence and power through the ramps, what is usually an intimidating slope will disappear under your wheels, making molehills of mountains.

If the Big Ring is a hammer, then not every climb is a nail. (I realize too late that referring to the road as a nail is sure to bring the Puncture Apocalypse on today’s ride.) The guns get more massive from the practice of Rule #90, but it comes at a hefty price: souplesse withers like a delicate flower as one seeks to conquer the art of mashing a huge gear. Indeed, one of the great pleasures in Cycling is to sense a certain fluidity of your stroke which belies the feeling of strength in your muscles as you continue to heap coals on the fire.

This requires an art altogether different from moving Sur la Plaque; it relies on turning the pedals at a higher cadence and shifting gear whenever the gradient changes. Rhythm holds court over everything else and is maintained at all costs. As the gradient steepens, the chain is slipped into the next smaller gear; as the gradient eases, it is droped back down. Not every climb suits this style of riding; the rear cluster must be matched perfectly to accomodate the changes in pitch such that maximum speed is maintained and the legs allowed to continue their relentless churn. When synchronized perfectly, it is the gateway to La Volupté; when not: disaster.

Such is the nuance of shifting gear, such is the nature of Cycling.

frank

The founder of Velominati and curator of The Rules, Frank was born in the Dutch colonies of Minnesota. His boundless physical talents are carefully canceled out by his equally boundless enthusiasm for drinking. Coffee, beer, wine, if it’s in a container, he will enjoy it, a lot of it. He currently lives in Seattle. He loves riding in the rain and scheduling visits with the Man with the Hammer just to be reminded of the privilege it is to feel completely depleted. He holds down a technology job the description of which no-one really understands and his interests outside of Cycling and drinking are Cycling and drinking. As devoted aesthete, the only thing more important to him than riding a bike well is looking good doing it. Frank is co-author along with the other Keepers of the Cog of the popular book, The Rules, The Way of the Cycling Disciple and also writes a monthly column for the magazine, Cyclist. He is also currently working on the first follow-up to The Rules, tentatively entitled The Hardmen. Email him directly at rouleur@velominati.com.

View Comments

  • @mouse

    As for the other bit; re Steel:  I'm a bit of a retro grouch as well.  Columbus SL?  Been there, done that.  I'm not sure that I would bother getting a steel bike again as I'm pretty impressed with carbon; how light it is and how it rides.

    I love the TSX, no question. But, given the choice between the steel, alu, or carbon - I pick the carbon every time. The steel did not make it onto the roads hardly at all this year; it is thus undergoing a new project to make it more compelling.

    In the end, a good carbon bike has better road feel, stiffness, and comfort than anything else. 

    @Marcus

    @DerHoggz my steel Baum - custom made almost 9 years ago - has a sloping TT. And I wasn't given a choice in the matter... which may support your theory. And/or it may be that the framebuilder (Darren Baum) rightly kept my creative input to a minimum.

    Why is that? Because you were asking him to build you one of these so you could finally look your competitors in the eye?

  • @Marcus

    @rauce weeeell, I think your bottom bracket height is going to have a helluva lot more influence on clearance than a relatively miniscule decrease to the diameter of your big cog...

    He meant the big ring, genius. The impact of the cog's clearance is reduced somewhat by the FUCKING WHEEL.

  • @brett

    @G'rilla

    We really need a Keepers Tour of the Antipodes with Brett, Marcus, Mouse, Minion, Oli, and crew.

    We could probably sell it to a TV network as a reality drama.

    Come on down... we also have Bianchi Denti, rigid, G'Phant/Cap'n FuckAround, and a whole host of awesome lurkers right here in Welly and beyond...

    And I really want to see the Marcus and minion Show live!

    Wow, no shit. It would be like a cock fight, but between two hens.

  • @MartinD

    @frank

    On the other hand, I'm 100% sure you have a better mechanical advantage in the 53×26 than in the 39×19 or whatever the equivalent-sized gear ratio is in the 39.

    Without wanting to seem more of a grumpy old bastard than absolutely necessary ...

    10 and 11 speed cassettes and compact cranks certainly mean that the idea of putting it in the big ring isn't what it used to be. My 1977 Peugeot PX-10 came with a 45-52 and 5 speed 13-21. This cluster was of course just used for training. Everyone raced on a 13-17 (a beautiful Regina Oro version for me - probably the classiest thing on the bike). Some friends had 42 tooth inner rings, but I don't think anyone had a 39.

    It was relatively flat where I grew up, but windy enough that a large part of many races was in the small ring.

    I think it was some time in the 80's when the 39 was introduced after the modern spider was developed. Another good thing. Before that, 42 was as low as you could go.

    Wow, a 13x17. Was it hard to see with all that hair on your chest?

  • great one Frank, I have thought about this one for sometime, along with alot of other cyclo-specifics as we do

    Your dead on, its an art that we should possess, yet one that is continuously in need of honing.  My buddy, rides with the souplesse, has a Peterbuilt diesel engine and just floats up hills in the big ring.  It is intimidating, and I have patterned myself similarly, with good results, and having very few riders in the midwest, when we do get together for group rides, it does pay dividends.  It is a running joke with buddy and i as we ride, the first hill, the sounds of everyones derailleurs running through the gears is amazing.  And the timing is like you guys have mentioned, for most its the very appearance of the hill makes the novice plummet into a sinkhole of granny gears.

    For the weathered cyclist however, to sit in the saddle and Roule through the hill with finesse is a thing of beauty

    another buddy of mine, showed up to a ride with a fixie, (no hipster style here, just one gear), and I have been hooked and find it is a killer work out for off season.  I know some consider this the ananthema of multi-cogestry, but I find it a great thing.   And it too, when used correctly is both intimidating and contributes to a souplesse that jumpstarts your next season like nothing else.  Its a kickass deal for descending skills.  But agreed, no hipsters allowed, one must comply to the remainder of the Rules, and BTW, Eddy rode one too in early season riding for training for all you naysayers out there.

    @ universio: where do you run a 54/44 21-11??  Kansas??, because if you run that gear in colorado or appalachia or the great NW, your PRO stud material as those gears don't even find themselves in the peloton

  • @frank

    @mcsqueak

    @DerHoggz

    Here is his superlight race bike, 10.8lbs of mostly steel:

    Love the colors, but I have to say I'm sort of getting over sloping TT geometry... on my next bike it'll be straight unless there is a very compelling reason for it otherwise.

    That is too compact for my tastes, but the smaller triangles of a compact are stiffer than the larger ones on standard geo; the longer seatpost then also gives a nice dampening effect. Its a very good design.

    Ah, that would make sense, thanks for the brief explanation (and to others who replied). I am woefully ignorant on the benefits of different frame geometries, just as I am with many things in life. I just like the look of a straight TT a bit more right now, ignoring any sort of performances changes.

    I've always wondered about bikes that people say "aren't stiff". My current ride is mostly Alu AND compact, and it feels very stiff to me when firing the pale guns of the north. And it's the only nice bike I've ridden, so I've not had experience with a frame that feels flexy. OR, maybe it has flex and I just don't know? Who the fuck knows.

    @frank

    @brett

    Come on down... we also have Bianchi Denti, rigid, G'Phant/Cap'n FuckAround, and a whole host of awesome lurkers right here in Welly and beyond...

    And I really want to see the Marcus and minion Show live!

    Wow, no shit. It would be like a cock fight, but between two hens.

    I'd like to float the idea that both Marcus and Minion are the same person, posting on different accounts. I don't think they've ever been seen together, so it's plausible.

  • @frank

    @snoov

    Interesting, I wonder if the large rings (less friction) balances out with the straighter chain, which I'm assuming also has less friction.

    That's always got my noodle going. With how close the chain rings are on modern cranksets, I'm not sure its a significant difference between being in the 39×25 vs 53×23. But being in a bigger cog in the back is for sure more efficient by a considerable margin; consider turning the wheel by the axle vs turning it by the tire; the farther out the chain is, the better. Similarly, in the big ring, you're creating better leverage by sitting in the 53.

    But the matter is muddied considerably by friction of the chain entering the chainring, less friction by distributing the load over a larger surface and bending the links less, and the bend in the chain as it moves from chain ring to cog.

    All delightfully nuanced and messy, per the subject of the article.

    I've noticed that some pros use larger jockey wheels to reduce the bending of the chain you mention and btw, another inspiring article.  of course I want to ride up hills in the big ring, I'd just rather do it on the 19.

  • @snoov

    Its funny the discussion is mostly centered on climbing in the big ring. I thought the article was about knowing when to get out of the big ring and the art of shifting to maintain souplesse - which to me implies climbing in the little ring.

    That's what I love about this community; the articles are really just a springboard into talking about whatever people feel like talking about.

    I've noticed that some pros use larger jockey wheels to reduce the bending of the chain you mention

    I've notice the same but never realized that was what they were after. Its inspired!

  • @mcsqueak

    Comparing my Al bike to my old steel one, same BSA bottom bracket shells, but I noticed especially when standing that there seems to be less flex going on at the BB.  New bike does have external bearings though.

  • I've been gearing down more on recent rides (in part due to a lack of fitness) for precisely what you're describing. I'm built to mash, but have been deliberately working on trying to find a higher cadence. Not because I prefer it, but in order to be able to spin better. Finding that rhythm. 
     
    Also, too: Frank complained about my sprinting up hills: Wiggins talks about always being one minute from bonking, so all you have to do is ride one minute more (can anyone point me to where he said that?). For Wiggins, this was a "peaking in two months" kind of statement, suggesting that the time frame shifted. My problem is that that minute doesn't move. I have 60 second. Period. And it doesn't seem to matter whether I'm going up in a big gear or a little gear: I'm going to be gassed in 60 seconds. So go up fast.
1 7 8 9 10 11 16
Share
Published by
frank

Recent Posts

Anatomy of a Photo: Sock & Shoe Game

I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Men’s World Championship Road Race 2017

Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Women’s World Championship Road Race 2017

The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Vuelta a España 2017

Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Clasica Ciclista San Sebastian 2017

This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…

7 years ago

Route Finding

I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…

7 years ago