Mudguards (fenders) and saddlebags are two subjects that are sure to get our collective ire up as Cyclists. When I wrote in one of my columns for Cyclist that saddlebags should never be used, my editor told me that he received a record number of emails threatening to cancel their subscription on the basis that my column was a “black eye” on an otherwise sterling publication. I don’t disagree with the premise; but the fact that it was this statement that brought it about brings to light how much people love their saddlebags. The Pros use them in training, so how dare I claim that we should not.
The fact is, we’re not trying to look like Pros; we are trying to Look Fantastic at All Times and just because the Pros do it doesn’t mean it looks good. In fact, the Pros often look as rubbish as the typical cyclotourist; they just go faster than us. But Fournel’s Theorem is not commutative; just because you’re fast doesn’t mean you look good.
And so, saddlebags are banned on the premise that they are ugly, no further discussion required. Mudguards, on the other hand, are banned for the fact that are ugly, noisy, and are an implied contravention of Rule #9. The Nine is about submitting to the deluge, about embracing the misery of training in the cold and wet; it is about dedication and discipline above the creature comforts found at home. Post-ride, the bicycle is carefully and lovingly cleaned and made ready for the next ride. Rider and machine bonded together through mutual commitment.
Mudguards protect the frame and bottom bracket from road grit, it is true enough. But I don’t care. They also deflect the grime cast up by the tires as they carve their solemn trough over the wet tarmac. Still don’t care. On group rides, Fendangelists preach to anyone who appears to the ride without mudguards about how rude they are, forcing the others to chew on their rooster tail while riding in the bunch. To this I suggest that if you’d like to avoid a rinsing with Belgian Toothpaste there is usually an open spot for you on the front of the bunch..
Half the satisfaction of a hard Rule #9 ride is your appearance upon your return home, further mystifying The Cyclists to the rest of the world. I lovingly admire my mud-spattered bicycle and take in my flemish tanlines as I remove my kit. To ride with noisy mudguards would not only be a violation of the Principle of Silence, but more importantly I would be depriving myself of this greatest of pleasures.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
Riding a cross race in sloppy conditions is sometimes the epitome of Rule #9. I'll also argue that after a full day of on and off rain while riding the cow shite country roads with my teammates, is classic Rule #9. You see, during the rainy moments, the mud and shite mix to coat the bike and body. As the rain ends, you begin to form a nice crust as you dry a bit. Then another pocket of light rain and more of the mix. Repeat several times. By days end, you are literally layered with the mix. You can likely scrap each layer from your face separately to reveal the sections of the county you rode through and the breed of cow shite you carried home.
@Oli
That was going to be my original cover photo to cut it off at the pass, but went for the bog monster instead. That lorry shot is so awesome.
@Sparty
They used to build walls from that mix.
@Ron
Now that's no way to talk about David Beckham . . .
@frank
So here's the question: does that lorry have the right to ignore stop lights and stop signs? What if he did and got pulled over? "But officer" said the driver, "I was motorpacing M. Merckx on a training run." "You were?" replied M. Gendarme, "Well, carry on then. So sorry to interrupt work in the national interest."
@wiscot
You going to argue with a thing that size?
Snowed yesterday? Not my problem.
Had myself a nice Rule 9 ride this past weekend. Moving to western WA has made me realize that if I don't go out when it's pissing rain, I'm just not going to ride. Not as muddy as the Belgian shot above (perish the thought) but still took a while to get the grime out. @Frank will be glad to know I've seen the error of my ways vis a vis toe covers, and have some booties on order.
I like the crack about spots at the front. Going to use that next time someone complains.
@hudson
Hill repeats. Go.
I truly find myself torn on this issue. Looking good is a key part of riding well, no doubt, whether on or off-road. Prior to moving to Seattle fenders never made it onto my bike. Ever. But there are days here in the northwest where it is so dang wet that keeping ones feet and butt region dry(er) is a big plus to get out and ride a decent distance. In fact, the first group ride I attended here in January 1989 I was relegated to the back of the group for not having fenders, despite my willingness to drag everyone around in the wind.
Factoring in N+1, one of my rides is a sad sack Raleigh POS rain bike that is fenderized. It is the antithesis of my preferred ride; Ugly vs sexy, heavy vs light, creaky vs silent. It is punishment to ride, perhaps even to those nearby. Lucky for me, without my hearing aids I cannot hear the racket, and in the dark of winter few are around to spot me riding the Pig.
Still, I always feel so dirty after riding the fender bike. But it's good to suffer.