Why would any sane person choose to suffer? The answer to this question is a primal one and of particular relevance to society in the current age: control. With chaos and uncertainty creeping from every corner of life, cycling provides us with control over physical suffering; to suffer at our own will provides us the control we viscerally crave. This control then provides us the courage to face uncertainty in life with the confidence that we can handle anything it can throw at us.
There is no challenge within Cycling which more comprehensively embodies this notion than The Hour Record, which represents the only event that pits the rider not against a course, but against Time itself; how far can the rider propel themselves in the span of sixty minutes while also suppressing their nausea as they turn left endlessly?
The cruelty is hard to grasp. As cyclists we suffer, but our suffering is normally proportional to it’s intensity – certainly it hurts to ride harder, but the harder we ride, the sooner the pain will subside. In the Hour, the duration of the suffering is uniform: the effort will last 60 minutes and no amount of increased suffering will shorten it, unless, of course, you believe Al Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity, which states that for a body moving at speed, time moves relatively slower than it does for a body at rest. According to Al, then, the rider will experience a marginally reduced Hour measured not by a clock moving with the rider, but by a clock sitting at rest at the side of the track. (While this amount of time is mathematically negligible, it does explain why intervals on the trainer feel comparatively more interminable than intervals on the road.)
Eddy Merckx himself made the following observation after setting the benchmark effort of 49,431 meters in 1972:
The pain was very, very, very significant. There is no comparison with a time trial. There you can change gear, change your cadence, relax even if it is only for a few instants’ respite. The Hour is a permanent, total, intense effort, which can’t be compared to anything else.1
Knowing that the Prophet’s bunkmate was The Man With the Hammer, the triple use of the word “very” is somewhat panic-inducing.
In recent years, the Hour Record has sadly seen a decline in interest, with the last attempt by world-class rider having been made by Chris Boardman in 2000. Boardman was at the center of the Hour’s Golden Era in the early Nineties which saw Graeme Obree kick off a frenzy of attempts to raise it ever higher by first breaking the record in his innovative tuck position as an amateur in 1993. Boardman broke it a few months later, before Obree reclaimed it in his even-more radical Super-Man position. This was a period where Boardman, Obree, Miguel Indurain, and Tony Rominger all traded the record for the better part of a decade, each going ever-farther in evermore innovative riding positions.
The UCI put a halt to the interest in this record by establishing two records, the (Athlete’s) Hour Record and The Best Human Effort. The Hour restricts the equipment to that of a standard double-triangle frame with drop bars, while the Best Human Effort has no such restriction. While the intent was to establish a more equal judgement of the athlete instead of the focus on equipment, it misses the point that advancement, evolution, and innovation are all basic elements of what it means to be Human, and by eliminating these elements from The Hour, they eliminated the appeal in what is our sport’s most primal effort. After all, there were few riders willing to go head to head with Merckx in his time, and so there are few who are willing to do so today.
Chris Boardman stands apart in this regard and indeed went after the new record, which he broke by a whopping 10 meters3. Over the course of his career, he set the record three times, which makes him possibly both the toughest and slowest-learning human currently living; even Merckx declared he would never attempt the Hour a second time, despite having fallen short of his personal goal of 50,000 meters. Boardman describes the Hour in simple, physiological terms: with every push of the pedals, you break down the fibers in your muscles such that for each subsequent revolution, you have a little less functional muscle mass available to sustain your current speed and power through to the end. In a word, devastation. It is not the sort of thing one attempts more than one needs to.
To gauge an effort of this type is perhaps the most pure description of The V; you ride not as hard as you know you can, but as hard as you hope you might. Boardman, on the Hour Record:
You have three questions going through your mind:
How far to go?
How hard am I trying?
Is the pace sustainable for that distance?
If the answer is “yes”, that means you’re not trying hard enough. If it’s no, it’s too late to do anything about it. You’re looking for the answer “maybe”.2
Despite all the training, preparation, and technical advancement that goes into any attempt on l’Heure, it remains a matter of the Human element, one of imprecise precision.
1,2 These quotes are taken from William Fotheringham‘s biography of Eddy Merckx, Merckx, Half Man, Half Bike.
3 It has been broken since by other, lower-profile riders since.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
I really like that quote from Fotheringham's Merckx book. I think it applies equally well to road cyclists in reference to climbing.
Time. In competitive cycling anyway, it's always about the clock. Not just in TT's, but during any race; "how long can I stay redlined", "How long before I recover enough to attack again", or in noncompetitive cycling, "how many hours can I keep turning the pedals"?
Climbing and TT's have always been my favorite parts of the sport. Seeing how hard I can push, how much I can suffer is a test of myself regardless of the result.
In the 90's, I kinda considered taking a run at the Oregon State hour record (I have no idea what it is/was). Having never ridden the track, I went with a friend, a Cat I trackie, and he showed me how to best navigate a fixie track bike on the steepest track in the US, Alpenrose. After a hour or so of practice, I realized that even as a very fit Cat II, I wasn't worthy of even attempting a run at it. It's unfathomable to me how the guys at the top of the sport can ride that hard, that fast with one set of gear inches. Mad respect to those that try.
This may give an idea of how steep the track is here;
Nice piece, Frank.
@VeloVita
Not so sure -- on a climb or in a TT, if you can keep up a faster pace, the suffering ends sooner. The hour is an hour of suffering. There is nothing you can do to make it end sooner.
@scaler911
That's pretty awesome! I'd say that's steeper than Daytona?
@Nate
That's exactly right - and that's the diabolical difference between a traditional event and The Hour - and to @scaler911's - all those considerations are a matter of time, of course, but the are ultimately determined by the distance you need to travel. Go faster, it ends sooner. Get in a break away and start wondering how long you can stay away, well - that comes down to distance again - can I stay away until the finish or the top of the climb.
But in the Hour, its an hour. Period. Can you do it for 60 minutes? Because whether you are riding 45, 48, 50, or 55kmph, you will be riding for 60 minutes regardless.
It makes failure and success seem even more absolute than in a normal race as well.
@frank
Adding a fixed gear to that puts it over the top. Which is why you should totally try this on June 17.
@Nate
@frank
My point wasn't that climbing is as intense an effort as the hour record, just that when climbing the questions you ask yourself as well as the answers are the same: how far to go?; how hard am I trying?; is this pace sustainable for the distance? If the goal is to reach the top of the climb as fast as possible, either to set a PR or to end the suffering, whether you are trying hard enough or whether the pace you are riding is sustainable for the distance is always going to be answered as 'maybe'. Otherwise you either know you could be riding harder and therefore faster, or you already went too deeply into the red and its too late and you pop.
@VeloVita
I suppose you are right that the yes/no/maybe method of outsmarting yourself would work for climbing.
@frank
The volume of your writing blows me away. Always great to read, thanks again.