There was no clear indication that Rick’s car had actually come to a complete stop. It wasn’t that the car hadn’t stopped its forward trajectory – it had – it was just that the car hadn’t actually stopped moving. Long after the vehicle had come to rest in what could only be considered a legitimate parking spot by the most liberal of reasoning, bits and pieces kept clanking about, seeming almost to defy the laws of perpetual motion.
I was more familiar with his car than I wished I was. For one thing, the cafeteria tray on the passenger side that covered the hole between the wheel well and interior was not nearly as effective as Rick supposed, though to be fair, it was hard to discern that particular draft from the various other drafts whipping about the cabin. For another, I was uncomfortable with how the entire contraption shook when it accelerated beyond walking speed. This shaking did not prevent him from punching well beyond the freeway speed limit, usually with one hand on the wheel and somewhere between zero and two eyes on the road.
Once the car had shimmied to rest, Rick climbed out with his usual happy grin and motioned towards the pristine, full suspension mountain bike perched atop the rack affixed to the roof of his car. Without so much of a hint of justification, he pronounced a phrase that stuck with me and eventually evolved into Rule #25: “Hey, the bike’s always gotta be worth more than the car, right?”
This was Rick’s typical flavor of genius: simple and concise, irrefutable in its logic. The car exists only to carry us to The Ride. Beyond that, all it does is suck money away from The Bike. The first cars I owned fell comfortably into this way of thinking, though I was never able to afford the rack required to actually get the bikes on the roof of the car. It was on that technicality, then, with my bikes shoved inside instead of atop my car, that I went merrily along my way knowing the vehicles I drove were only minimally siphoning money from my bicycle fund.
Rule #25 has been a challenge ever since we sold our fun little beater car and bought a nice car. After a few years of wrestling with what to do about our negative Car to Bike Value Ratio (CBVR), I came to the conclusion that we needed to buy another crappy car and use that one to drive out to our riding destinations. After a while, the crappy car sucked so much more than the nice car that we never drove it, so we sold the crappy car and bought a second nice car. Now we were really in deep water from a negative CBVR perspective, if not from the perspective of enjoying locomotion or safety.
The solution, of course, is rather simple. Within the next year, we’ll own both cars, which means they must be nearly worthless as otherwise neither the bank nor the car dealership would allow such a thing as “ownership” to happen. Barring that, owning a nice car simply dictates that one is to buy more and better bikes. This also requires, of course, a rather significant ancillary investment into roof racks for your vehicle if you don’t have any welding or nunchuck skills that you can use to fashion your own.
Just remember that a happy bike is a bike that gets ridden; there is nothing sadder than a loyal steed who sits unused in the basement.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@ChrisO
The only thing not to like is that "Pajero" means wanker in Spanish, which is why they change the name for sale in Spain...
Both of my current bikes out-value my vehicle. I bought a Chevy Blazer new back in 1998 and am still driving it today. The Blazer is the vehicle that gets me around with the bikes so I think I am well within Rule 25 guidelines. However, I do have an E60 M5 in the garage that completely ruins the CBVR of the household. ;)
-Dinan
My car 2001 Ford Taurus wagon 200k miles and on its last leg. My ride 1987 Trek 400 Elance with plenty of life left. The Trek rides a lot smoother and way more quietly than the Ford, so I think I am following Rule 25 even though they may be worth about the same.
Good
that is an ok article. http://ieeconsulting.in/buy-christian-louboutin-shoes-wholesale.html http://ieeconsulting.in/buy-christian-louboutin-shoes-wholesale.html
I know that this is an old thread, but I missed it before. Great story!
Anyhow, a green 2005 Scion Xb with a manual gearbox (Painfully slow and dorky looking) and 195,000km on the odometer carries my Glorious Steel Waterford R-33 in the back seat with the front wheel removed. No roof rack yet since I'd hate to spend that money on the car, but if carrying the bike inside the car counts, then it's definitely Rule 25 compliant.
Pretty part of content. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to claim that I get actually loved account your blog posts.
Anyway I will be subscribing in your augment and even I success you get admission to consistently rapidly.
@thrivers
Re-arrange the following to make sense? I am sure there is a coherent sentence in there somewhere but for the love of the gods I can't quite put my finger on it....
@Deakus
Shit me, wasting my working day browsing random articles and I find a bunch of pictures of Morgans, and then the revelation that Deakus actually lived in MY HOME TOWN.
I live in Malvern until I moved out to go to uni age 18. Also, my house was about 200m from the Morgan factory.
How very exciting.