Innovating with bandannas, Pantani proves the system supports even this unorthodox headpiece.

Aesthetics have always played a major role in my quest to become a better athlete. On the surface, this may seem a ridiculously vain assertion, but for me, the reality is that looking like a pro makes me feel like a pro, and when I feel like a pro, I’m motivated to ride like a pro.  After all, the mind controls the body, and if the mind believes something, it can shove it right down your body’s throat. This phenomenon plays a big part of why I love riding in weather that merits knee warmers, cycling caps, and shoe covers; when my head drops down in a swoon of agony, the sight of my flahute-looking legs and feet, framed by the water dripping from the brim of my cycling cap helps me find the motivation to lift the pace a bit more.

Central to this quest of looking Pro is the ability to look good when you place objects on your head, like helmets or cycling caps*. It’s actually quite easy to look good in these things, provided you follow a simple set of guidelines, known as The Three-Point System. Many people simply plop a piece of head wear on their heads without regard for how it is positioned on their orb-like noggins, and with little appreciation of how entirely idiotic it might make them look. Seemingly innocent mistakes such as placing it askew or tilted backward being the most common breaches of good taste, the most egregious allowing hair to be visible between the forehead and said head wear.

The Three-Point system was devised out of necessity when I was in high school on the Nordic ski team. A ski hat being perhaps the most difficult hat to look good in, my fellow teammates would commonly pull theirs down over their head to cover their ears, and would happily go about their business completely unaware that they looked as though they had an unfortunate encounter with a large woolen and overripe fruit. Through an iterative process of counseling and advising them on what adjustments to make to position the hat correctly, I stumbled upon this standardization which seems to almost universally yield Awesome results.

There are three main contact points on the head that contribute to looking fantastic while wearing something fundamentally ugly on your head: the eyebrows, the tips of the ears, and the nape of the neck. (In this case, the nape is referred to as the point where the skull meets the neck, not the hairline.)

Point 1: The Eyebrows.  Your forehead is your enemy when it comes to looking cool in hats or helmets. You know who rides around with a big swath of exposed frontal cranium? The guy in the YJA, riding in the Sit Up and Beg Position, that’s who.  Keep this gap to a minimum at all times; helmets and backwards cycling caps should be worn close to the eyebrows and expose no more than a centimeter of forehead, as demonstrated by Der Kaiser and Il Priata. A forwards-facing cycling cap should have the lowest point of the brim intersect with the horizontal line connecting both eyebrows, as demonstrated by the late Franco Ballerini.

Point 2: The Ears. Consider the ears the pivot point of your head wear. Keep your shit level and close to the ears; helmets and caps are to be worn just above the ear, winter hats should cover just the tips of your ear.

Point 3: The Nape of the Neck.  Under no circumstances – ever, no matter what – is any part of your head wear to wander down below this threshold. EVER.  With modern helmets, the cranial locking mechanism should secure around this part of your melon; a cycling cap or ski hat should flirt with the upper reaches of this area.

As if you needed any further convincing, I leave you with some examples of the proper execution of the Three-Point system, along with some tragic failures.

[dmalbum path=”/velominati.com/content/Photo Galleries/frank@velominati.com/Three Point System/”/]

*Obviously, this is only applicable within the parameters as laid out by Rule #22.

frank

The founder of Velominati and curator of The Rules, Frank was born in the Dutch colonies of Minnesota. His boundless physical talents are carefully canceled out by his equally boundless enthusiasm for drinking. Coffee, beer, wine, if it’s in a container, he will enjoy it, a lot of it. He currently lives in Seattle. He loves riding in the rain and scheduling visits with the Man with the Hammer just to be reminded of the privilege it is to feel completely depleted. He holds down a technology job the description of which no-one really understands and his interests outside of Cycling and drinking are Cycling and drinking. As devoted aesthete, the only thing more important to him than riding a bike well is looking good doing it. Frank is co-author along with the other Keepers of the Cog of the popular book, The Rules, The Way of the Cycling Disciple and also writes a monthly column for the magazine, Cyclist. He is also currently working on the first follow-up to The Rules, tentatively entitled The Hardmen. Email him directly at rouleur@velominati.com.

View Comments

  • @Ron
    Le Professeur was quite proud of the overalls design (a nod to the sponsor), which he had a significant hand in. A unique chap...

  • G'phant:
    @Cyclops
    Not much assistance with the "But you look like a dick, Mate" riposte.

    Do Kiwis shave their dicks, too? Nevermind, don't answer that.

  • @Ron

    And finally, if you are so passionate about this three point system, what are your feelings on the current trend of d-bags who wear oversized, fitted baseball hats, don't bend the brim and, worst of all, tuck their ears in? I always do a double take when I see these people, at first assuming they just got off the short bus, but no, they are walking around proud, sporting this look.

    Three-Point system notwithstanding, that shit is deplorable on a number of aesthetic levels. They can fuck off.

    @Marcus
    That may seem to be the case, but as this photo demonstrates, he was able to tuck his ears in. While this is still not a winter hat, aside from the slightly too big gap on the forehead, this demonstrates good Three-Point System format for wearing a winter ski hat.

  • @sgt

    I even try to match gloves and socks to kit whenever possible.

    Um...YEAH. It's, like, kind of required. No red socks with the V-Kit. No red helmets. I bought new socks and a new helmet when it first arrived.

  • @G'phant

    Le Professeur was quite proud of the overalls design (a nod to the sponsor), which he had a significant hand in. A unique chap...

    Finished the book, eh? His account made me rethink it, but as it turns out it's still just ball ugly.

  • @frank
    Take a look at the pressure his ears are under - this was only an attempt at a temporary solution. As soon as he slipped the Brikos under the bandana, the ears would have been released like a dog off a chain!

    I recall that in the book, the Death of Marco Pantani, it mentions that he went through a number of different options to try to reduce the look of his ears in caps, etc. He really was rule aware.

  • @frank "No red helmets." Say what?!! Why was I not informed of this when I ordered my new RED helmet from BRETT?! (Will hunt elsewhere for a red-framed helmet mirror to match it, as Brett will presumably try to sell me a lime green one.)

    Yes, finished the book. COuldn't put it down. Not great literature, but a great read.

    @sgt Chapeau. I asked for that. And in case you are genuinely curious, not to my knowledge. But my sample size is only 1.

  • @Ron

    @Cyclops

    Also, when did the trend start that you leave that weird hologram sticker on the bill to prove you're wearing an "authentic" cap? I don't understand it, as I don't wear ballcaps of any sort.

    In regards to a personal pet-peeve with cycling headwear, those stupid helmets that are large and round, and usually have dumb graphics on them (such as a water melon or an 8-ball) drive me crazy. Seriously, those should only be for children and people who are otherwise not capable of making such decisions for themselves. I can't imagine how hot those must be in the summer, too.

  • Leg shaving, it's all about vanity and conformity.

    Looking pro, same.

    Following the rules, same.

    The need for conformity in cycling has always bugged me as I was a punk rocker but still conformed to the Rules and understood their importance even before they were written down here.

    I believe it all stems from OCPD - a personality disorder which involves an obsession with perfection, rules, and organization. People with OCPD may feel anxious when they perceive that things are not right. This can lead to routines and rules for ways of doing things, whether for themselves or their families.

Share
Published by
frank

Recent Posts

Anatomy of a Photo: Sock & Shoe Game

I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Men’s World Championship Road Race 2017

Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Women’s World Championship Road Race 2017

The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Vuelta a España 2017

Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…

7 years ago

Velominati Super Prestige: Clasica Ciclista San Sebastian 2017

This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…

7 years ago

Route Finding

I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…

7 years ago