Eight point V bar. From the moment I bought my first set of high quality road clinchers, I’ve ridden at that pressure. I started with that number because that’s the pressure the sidewall told me to pump them up to; I didn’t yet understand much about balancing the benefits of high and low pressures to optimize comfort and friction; I just pumped them up as instructed and off I went merrily down the road.
I’m not as thin as I’d like to be, which is the same thing as saying I’m fatter than I should be, though I certainly hope I climb well for my weight, especially as my third (and hopefully charmed) ascent up Haleakala is looming large in Vajanuary. The point is, I’m not a whippet and even if I starved myself for the next five months and subsist exclusively on IPAs (I draw the line at cutting beer out of my theoretical diet; I might get desperate, but I’m no savage) I’d still be an Eros Poli at best. Being a big guy, the only factor that mattered to me when it came to tire pressure was avoiding the pinch flats that plagued me during my time riding cheaper tires and that meant maximum pressure, no questions asked.
We always dialed our pressure in for Mountain biking and would pull a few pounds out of our road tires when riding in the rain, but by and large, tire pressure was tire pressure, and as far as I was concerned, more was better. I even had a set of 20mm tires on a makeshift TT bike I had that I blew up to a whopping 10 bar. In the last few years, however, the Cycling world has become obsessed with doing the limbo and seeing how low they can go on tire pressure. It all began with an article in Bicycle Quarterly which conducted an extensive and flawed study on the effects of tire pressure and tire width, and concluded that lower pressure and wider tires are faster and more comfortable than high pressure, narrow tires; the idea is that lower pressure allows small bumps to be absorbed by the tire rather than bouncing the bicycle (and rider) in the air, and that wide tires flex more efficiently than narrow tires resulting in lower rolling resistance. Its important to remember that this gain in comfort and efficiency also comes with an increased risk of pinch flats.
This is all well and good, of course, though we always have to be careful to remember the basic principles of such a compromise; lower pressure and wider tires also mean an enlarged surface area which necessarily means more friction; a perfectly hard, narrow tire on a perfectly smooth surface would have almost zero friction, to the point that you’d be unable to gain enough traction to actually move the bicycle at all. What we’re after, in a practical sense, is a balance between the two extremes which optimizes comfort and tire efficiency against reduced surface area and the risk of pinch flats.
I became infected with Tire Pressure Fever myself as the Cycling world became increasingly obsessed with tire pressure. Down went the pressure in my tires and immediately I felt sluggish and lethargic on the bike. Climbing out of the saddle, I could feel the tires flex as I unleashed the Awesome Devastation of the Toothpicks of Navarone. Cornering was like steering in molasses; turn the bars, weight the pedals and then wait a few moments while the bike got round to responding.
These observations first had me reaching for the pump and then got me theorizing about what is really going on with tire pressure and what pressure is right for a given rider. I say “theorizing”, but most other people would use something closer to “guessing assertively”. But that doesn’t mean I’m wrong.
Basically, it comes down to finding the highest pressure and narrowest tire you can that gives a rider of your weight the right amount of tire flex such that your bike isn’t bouncing as it rolls over the tarmac and allows it to roll efficiently, all while minimizing surface area, risk of punctures, and sidewall deformation when accelerating (cornering and climbing are basically the same as accelerating; the acceleration vector is just in some other direction than forward.) This means that each rider at each weight with different preferences on the sliding scale between the above compromises will find a different optimal pressure. Impressed by Tom Boonen’s tire pressure at Roubaix? Tread carefully; that pressure was dialed in based on very specific criteria and unless you’re eating the same cobbles and weigh the same as he does, you’ll need a different pressure to find the same balance. Bicycle Quarterly has a chart that shows what they believe to be the ideal pressure by rider weight, though I don’t believe a word of it; I do however entertain the possibility that I could be missing something based on the fact that I didn’t actually read the article.
Me? I’m still happily riding at 8 point V. I’m comfortable, I’m not flatting, and I’ve got good control. Besides, it just has a nice ring to it.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@Nate, @Chris
Sounds like a problem with your stroke more than your pressure.
@frank
Nah there is just a point at which the tires get too mushy.
@frank
Possibly but I prefer to think of it as one of the few downsides to my stature. Being 7 or 8 kgs heavier but 15 cm shorter I'm obviously much more efficient at containing my molecules. The downside is that shorter levers allied to increased bulk will exacerbate any symmetrical spinning.
Maybe I should get some egg shaped rings.
@Nate
I find if you pump your tyre, then take the pump off (with the accompanying 'pst', that can only be air leaving the pump and tube), then put it back on again, you generally lose 5-10psi anyway. I have never put the pump back on after removing it, and have it up at the same pressure. Try it and let me know.
@Nate
62.4 - the spurious credibility of decimal point accuracy. I remember when we measured things in the police we always put two decimals in just make it look like we'd calibrated whatever we were measuring with and had actually measured what we were supposed to be measuring.
Next you'll be telling me that the pros calibrate their tyres to take account of altitude or the prevailing barometric pressure.
Awright, you engineer weenies. Tell me a wireless pressure sensor inside a tyre wouldn't be useful. Make it so it works with any tyre system, perhaps as a type of spoke nipple (yes, nipple lube required.) A very small receiver unit could be made for not only pre ride calibration, but to scream an alarm if pressures begin to drop rapidly - a blow out in progress.
One of you bright young engineers go make one, and I'll buy. Might even donate to a kickstrarter project for it.
@eightzero You'd need a counterweight to keep the wheel balanced.
@eightzero, @Nate
Build it into the removable valve core.
Oh, and as for the siren to notify an impending blowout, that is handled by the pilot already, thank you very much.
@frank, @eightzero
Stepping back, typical solution in search of problem. Next thing you'll tell me is I should have disc brakes on my road bike.
@frank
Yes to the counterweight in theory. Not sure anyone has actually balanced a bike wheel taking into account the valve stem, so most wheels may actually already be unbalanced. Put the sensor opposite the valve stem? And if building into a valve stem core, the difference in weight would theortically unbalance the wheel (fiurther?)
@frank I'm an engineer. I don't tust the pilot. Gotta say most of the flats I've had are the slow type. A few "hey, that feels squishy" and I look down and sure 'nuff. But...isn't there are bit of safety knowing your tyres are at spec before blasting down a descent? Yeah, a catastrophic failure isn't going to be avoided, but that's not a reason to try to avoid other types.
Like everything else on the Fucking Bike, it has it's balance of form, function and price. The Fucking Bike is a system, and not all features are desirable for every application, ride, rider, or variable situation. But being a bike engineer is a different deal - people pay Big Money for shit they don't need. Make one of these things for like $30 and I'd likely buy. Different than a $2000 power meter to yell at me "pedal harder." Yeah. I need that. I'm a pilot. I don't fucking trust engineers, especially when they try to sell me shitte.
I don't need more bike shitte. I need more time to ride my Fucking Bike. As I look out at the rain, snow and darkness.