Tradition and innovation sit mostly comfortably alongside each other in Cycling. The bicycle itself is inherently a very simple machine, the basic design of which has remained the same for centuries; frame, two wheels, cranks, saddle, handlebars. It’s what has been done to these elements along the way that has shaped what the modern road bike (because mountain bikes are way out there and another realm altogether) now looks like.
To me, they look like crap.
The ‘advancements’ made through the use of carbon fibre have without doubt benefitted those who really need to benefit in incremental steps, and that is Pro riders. These guys and gals are paid to ride a bicycle as fast as they can and to get it across a line hundreds of kilometres away from where they started before hundreds of others, sometimes by the barest of margins. That’s not us. We ride because we love the freedom, the health benefits, all that bullshit that Bicycling magazine will give you 7 tips on how to do it. We don’t need aero-tubed frames and deep dish carbon wheels, but we want them. Sure, all this stuff makes our experience better, and I’m not suggesting we all ride around on K-Mart bikes, even though we’d still probably have some form of fun if we did. Even if you race, even A grade at club level, or have a crack at Nationals, the bike isn’t going to make you win. I’ll repeat; you’re not a Pro.
This whole ‘aero’ frame fad that has taken over the peloton is all well and good when the sport’s top prizes are at stake. When rolling around with your mates and having a coffee before and a beer after is the modus operandi, then why not do it with a modicum of style? Aero bikes are not stylish. Those oversized, flattened, sharp edged carbon members (I refuse to call them tubes) are just downright ugly. The curvy swooping lines and bent-six-ways stays are an abomination. And some of the stems popping up now look like tumours growing from Frankenstein’s neck. I don’t like them, in case you’re not picking up on that.
The more I look at the new crop of ’boutique’ builders working with steel, the more I realise how much of a blight these carbon race frames are. My eyes are attuned to the simplicity of round, straight tubes, with a sensible diameter, and if they’re held together with lugs, well that’s not a bad thing either. But even these simple things of beauty can be sullied by another modern invention, the sloping top tube. A lot of the bikes that appeared in my feeds from the recent NAHMBS featured quite radically sloping tt’s, and whenever a flat tt’ed bike popped up it was even more apparent that flat is where it’s at. And I’m not saying this because I own such a bike; in fact, there was a period after purchasing my Jaegher where I questioned whether I should have had some slope built in. But the more I witness the glut of ugly that is is the Pro peloton, I’m glad I listened to the denizens who lovingly handcrafted my beauty, and kept the tubes like they are meant to be: flat, round and straight.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@Oli
I have a Wheels Mfg BB30 outboard bearing bottom bracket. Only have a few hundred miles on it, but very happy (not that I was really experiencing issues with the FSA adapters). I know a few other people with Wheels Mfg bottom brackets and they are very happy with them. Don't think you can go wrong. I think the angular contact bearings are the best value (unless you really feel like spending $$$ for ceramic bearings).
http://wheelsmfg.com/bottom-brackets/bb386evo/386evo-bottom-brackets.html?_=1458652667047
Plus (at least mine) add a little bling. :-)
@chuckp
Good to hear. I just got some Wheels bearings (BB30 admittedly) put in my #1. Not ridden it yet to see how they are. My biggest gripe with BB30 is getting the torque right. I do have a torque wrench, but they're hardly precision implements.
@wiscot
I have a torque wrench but actually used a shop torque wrench when I installed my Wheels Mfg bottom bracket. A little unnerving cranking it until it clicked because I have a dreaded fear of over-torquing bolts. And I usually pick a setting somewhere in the middle of the manufacturer spec torque range.
@Teocalli
I've got a thing for classic Rudy shades. And shades in general. I should snap a photo of my collection. Was actually all set to buy some new sunnies for spring cycling...when I realized the money would be better spent on casual prescription shades for commuting and off-the-bike life. I really, really have grown to hate contact lenses and only use them when I must.
@Ron
Old Rudy's like this:
Amen to this article! Here I thought I was wandering in a desert alone when looking at all the crazy plastic frames and sloping top tubes. But I just found the oasis!
I'm rockin a 22 year old Marinoni EL with Campy Chorus 8 gruppo and love the thing to death.
But, staying true to the V and n+1 criteria, I have a Hampsten La Dolce Vita in proper steel ordered with Steve. Soon to be riding around the Seattle area!
Now with more Marinoni...
@Kevin
Super stuff! I debated between Marinoni and Hampsten for my next road bike and ended up ordering with Steve. Great stuff.
I think that I might get a Marinoni Track bike in the future, though as there will be a velodrome within 30 minutes of where I am living in Germany.
Why pick between the two when you can just get one of each, eh???
@blue82vw
Just classically beautiful! Love it!
@Kevin
Fear not! You are not alone.
As a lightweight rider myself, I would love to ride an EL. Been on the hunt for one (within budget) for years. I ride a 23-24 year old SLX though which is none too shabby.