Some years ago, Issue 12 of Rouleur reawakened an obsession in me, one with a peculiar nature to it that only bicycle parts can invoke. For as long as I can remember, Royce hubs have seemed like the ultimate bicycle component: painstakingly hand-crafted to the tightest tolerances for error in the industry. With a reputation for indestructibility, ulta-high performance, and unmatched beauty, their appeal was made irresistible by the fact that they are completely unknown and seemingly impossible to come by in the United States.
Back in the early nineties, when the Internet was but a sparkle in Al Gore’s eye, Cycling coverage in the States was much more sparse than it is today. Television coverage was non-existent, VeloNews and Winning were the only two worthwhile cycling periodicals, and if an American won a race, it might make the back page of the Sports section in some papers that week. I filled my days devouring and re-devouring any Cycling-related books I could find, watching whatever VHS cassettes World Cycling Productions made available, and leafing through all of the Cycling Magazines my family gathered for me during trips abroad.
It is therefor impossible for me to say exactly when it was that I first heard of Royce and how I got my hands on the story, but it was of Will Fotheringham famously recounting that during the 1993 Tour de France, he was asked to bring a specialty wheelset over from the UK for Robert Millar, who at that stage in his career was struggling a bit and hungered for any advantage he could find. The wheels were built around a set of Royce hubs.
Having no means to learn anything real about the company, it took on the mystical. It was all rumors, but the name kept creeping about; Sean Yates used their components and Chris Boardman – the quintessential Bike Geek – was said to absolutely love their bits and had a particular affinity for their bottom bracket axels which he used in all his time trial bikes. For Boardman’s 2000 Athlete’s Hour Record, Royce was in charge of the wheels and supplied the hubs, machined the nipples, and customized the spokes (the nipples were recessed into the rims).
Then the trail went cold.
With not enough fuel to sustain the burn, the fire eventually died down, until that issue of Rouleur turned up in my mailbox with a dozen pages dedicated to the company and to Boardman’s attempt on the Hour. With the power of the Internet at my disposal and the information provided by the article, I was able to discover much more about them than ever before, but the rationalization to buy a set of hubs – should I even be able to track some down – didn’t present itself until Keepers Tour and its inevitable justification for building a set of indestructible wheels.
Royce is a small company, who focuses primarily on building their parts to order. They don’t mass-produce and provide stock the way companies like Shimano, Chris King, or even Campagnolo do. They work closely with select riders and work to provide highly specialized equipment; while they do produce standard road hubs, their production is limited and are generally fairly hard to come by.
One of the things I love most about handmade products is the small irregularities that remind you that a person – not a machine – crafted the product you hold in your hands. The finish on Royce hubs is otherworldly, but at the same time, the marks of a craftsman are upon them everywhere; in those small ways, the hubs I own are different from every other set in the world.
Handmade hubs also take time to break in. The Royce hubs, as they emerged from their box, held a stiffness in their bearings that would require several hundred kilometeres before they would adopt the feathery lightness for which they’re known. Having to ride the lightness into a set of hubs bonds you to them in a way a perfectly machined set will never do; with every turn of the silky bearings echoes each kilometer you worked together to arrive at where you are.
My handmade wheels – with the Golden Tickets and Royce hubs, represent for me the ultimate in customized bicycle components. They are not as fast as my Zipp wheels, and not as light. But in our short months together, we have already built a story that only serves to strengthen my love for Cycling. When my wheels and I return from Belgium in April, battered and bruised after carrying each other over the harshest and most sacred roads in Europe, the story will have become only richer.
Vive La Vie Velominatus.
[dmalbum path=”/velominati.com/content/Photo Galleries/frank@velominati.com/Royce/”/]
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@frank
The Aerolites are made by DT. I don't know how "heavy" they are compared to the Sapim CX Ray, but CX Ray spokes definitively lighter than the DT double butted spokes ("DT Competition"). So if you want to reduce the weight of your wheel and improve the aerodynamics to some extent without compromising reliability, you may want to try the CX Ray. But the wheel may feel a little less stiff as with "ordinary" double butted spokes. And you will probably need a tensiometer if you are going to lace a wheel with the CX Ray for the first time, since the CX Ray require a lot of tension due to their bigger elasticity. But I am sure Oli can give much more competent input when it comes to lacing, tensioning and trueing.
@frank
But you're quite cool with seeing him in bed with a bone?
@frank
@grumbledook
DT Aerolites and Sapim CX-Rays are almost identical weights, and both are within a few grams of DT Revolutions for 64 x spokes, or 100g lighter than 64x DT Competition or Sapim Race spokes.
However, they wheels built with Aerolites/CX-Rays will be stiffer than Comp/Race not less stiff, due to the higher tensions involved in building with them.
@Monkeyscat
Where's your sidekick?
@Oli
Another "+" for the aero spokes? :)
@grumbledook
Jeepers, you're hard work. For the cobbles, the most durable wheels are built with less stiffness, not more. Hence, for Frank's purposes, the CX-Rays or Aerolites would NOT be a plus. For other purposes, of course they might, but not with his choice of hub and rim and not for the very specific purpose he built the wheels in question for, i.e. the COBBLES. Please try and keep up.
@Oli
And your reply was so easy to guess.
@Monkeyscat
Why is there a picture of Gianni in this thread? And what have you done with his hairpiece???
@grumbledook
These guys might have a say in spoke choice,
My Cycling Sensai always chose and used DT's
In the end the skills of the builder make probably a much bigger difference than the spokes.
Agree. Spreading the spoke tension evenly throughout the build was the key. Early days saw me building egg shaped wheels.
A quick read here on spoke tension