Of all people, a Velominatus knows that our sport is a civilized one; it is steeped in tradition and etiquette and rife with unwritten rules. High on the list of unwritten rules are those that outline acceptable behavior when various hardships befall the leader of a Grand Tour. One of the reasons such rules exist is due to the brutally difficult nature of our sport; in the context of stage races where crashes and mechanical incidents are a part of daily life and can have a major impact on the competitive landscape, such conventions and agreements form a foundation in the quest to find the winner of the events through athletic, tactical, and strategic superiority while minimizing the impact that misfortune may have on the final outcome. The Golden Rule in this case is that riders are never to attack the race leader when they suffer a crash or mechanical incident.
At the Giro d’Italia, on Stage 7 over the Strada Bianchi, the race leader Vincenzo Nibali crashed and was left to struggle behind. The question was raised then, why did the leaders not wait for Nibali, the fallen Maglia Rosa, to rejoin before continuing to race? One reason might be that Nibali wasn’t considered a legitimate threat to take the final win. Another reason was that the race was on in full force and as such there were too many riders already attacking at the moment of the crash. Justified or not, the sportsmanlike thing to do would be to wait. They didn’t, and in the end it had little impact on the result (the winner, Ivan Basso, was also held up in the crash), but a small bit of our accepted etiquette died with the decision to continue on.
Today at the Tour de France, we saw a similar situation where the Brother Grimpeur the Younger distanced rival Alberto Contador before a mechanical eventually saw him lose his Yellow Jersey. Schleck had to stop to right his dropped chain, and while he did so, Contodor came by him and pushed his advantage home, all the way to the finish. In the end, Schleck lies a few seconds behind Bertie, and in truth the 30 second lead he had before the incident was likely not enough to win the Tour. Indeed, little has changed in the reality we face in the coming days: Andy must attack Contador if he is to win this year’s Tour.
One thing that has changed, however, is that Contador has proven something I have long suspected: he is a rider whose ambition to win is greater than his sense of sportsmanship. Marko has written in these archives about the A.C. Enigma and his ambivalence towards this rider. Bertie has given us little reason to love him, aside from his blistering accelerations up the steepest grades in the mountains. He has also given us little reason to hate him, for we know little about him. For me, the greatest riders are those who perhaps do not win often, but they lose with class and dignity, and they fight. Riders who display dignity and respect for the sport and fellow athletes in the midst of dishing out huge helpings of Rule #5 is what endears a rider to this particular heart. Jan Ullrich is the prime example of this; his sportsmanship on the slopes of Luz Ardiden in the face of an opportunity to win the 2003 Tour is unmatched. Even after spending year after year being beaten by Armstrong into second place; he still had the overriding sense of sportsmanship to wait and resist pushing home the advantage when Armstrong crashed.
In our sport, a champion is one who holds the unwritten rules of conduct in higher regard than a trophy. These are the athletes who understand that the very manner in which they set about achieving their results will be woven into the fabric of their career and weigh more heavily than the golden trophies of their victories.
At the end of the day, little has been decided in the outcome of the Tour. The one thing that has been determined is that Alberto Contodor is not a true champion, for he would rather win another Tour de France than show his fellow colleagues (not to mention the fans of this sport) the opportunity to discover who is the strongest through head-to-head competition. Alberto Contodor has shown his true colors as a great rider for whom winning is more important than sportsmanship.
Tomorrow will dawn with a renewed opportunity for Andy Schleck to also show his true colors. Will he protect his second place and race conservatively into Paris, or will he rise up to fight and try to win the Tour despite today’s setback? I have a feeling that we are about to be treated to the latter. I certainly hope so.
Alberto Contador did not need to wait today. But he should have, for ours is a civilized sport, and we, fellow cyclists, are not animals.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@all:
A video of the incident:
Spot on analysis. To take advantage of a mechanical by the MJ to aggressively attack is classless. It's the opposite of Rule #5, and since Bertie is not a hardman, he has to grasp the MJ in any manner available, apparently. Who wears the MJ - AC or AS, should be decided on who's the stronger rider and better strategist - not by a chain drop at a decisive moment. Then Bertie does his pistolero crap on the podium. Love the "boos" by the fans there!
AS was pissed and he has a fair amount of fire in him. I do not expect him to ride conservatively at all, and suspect that the Tourmalet will be a very interesting stage.
I agree with this article. Something in sport died today. Contador's behaviour was shocking and unsportsmanlike of the highest order. He may win this TdF, but it will be a hollow victory, and certainly not a moral one. A plague on his house.
This was Bertie's ridiculous excuse: "We'd been marking each other and I was starting to think about attacking. I was told after I did attack that there had been an incident, but when I launched the attack I didn't have any idea about what the incident was," Contador said. "When I did find out what had happened we already had a big advantage and it was too late to do anything about it as we were all riding hard."
Umm...correct me if I am wrong, but AS had just launched an attack, Veino responded and was pursuing, and AC was third...he would have had to have passed AS after his chain dropped when he was lurching around. SO AC's rationale is a bit sketchy to say the least.
It's amazing that AC is not getting more heat about this, frankly, other than on cycling forums...
@KitCarson
Exactly, the video above clearly shows AC pass and attack as Schleck is stopping; AC's explanation really doesn't cut it.
It was interesting to listen to Paul and Phil get at it; Phil definitely held that AC did nothing wrong, but Paul was very much in question as to what had happened.
I did my best to yell at AC to stop because he was being a "dirty slimy fuck". You do see him look around and maybe pretend to slow down for an instant, but if anything, that shows that he definitely assessed the situation and made the decision to continue. The notion that he didn't know what happened is ludicrous. As you say, he lurches around him to attack as Andy stops. Highly disrespectful to the Yellow Jersey, and these types of "excuses" are highly disrespectful to the fans.
I spent the time from the incident to the finish shouting encouragement at Andy. He climbed so well to take 20-30s out of Cuntador in the last bit of the climb.
I agree that AC knew exactly what was happening, the MJ is not going to stop suddenly in the middle of an attack except for a mechanical. Stephen Roche said the mechanical was probably Andy's fault, I'm wondering if he's losing some marbles in his old age... it doesn't matter if it was Andy's fault, it's not how the MJ should be lost, especially when he's the stronger rider.
Ok... this is worse than doping
Nathan - agree... My heart soared as Schleck got back on, the red mist descended and he put his all into climbing.... I just wish he'd caught them back... but him going past all the others like they were back markers standing still... Just awesome.
Interestingly, Contador was loudly booed on the podium taking his maillot jaune by the (somewhat educated, I must say) crowd in Bagneres de Luchon... and would love to know what Schleck said to him as he went up to take his white jersey passing Contador coming off stage.
On ITV4, Boardman said that Contador was right to attack, as Schleck hadn't fitted a chainguard as he'd gone without to save 50g for the climb [is this what Roche meant?], so Contador had calculated it was his (Schleck's) choice and his risk. Bollocks to that, I say. At best, Contador panicked... but then he had the remaining 3km of the climb to correct his error (and didn't); at worst, he disrespected the tradition of the race, the maillot jaune, and brought himself into disrepute. I also didn't see Menchov or Dirty Sanchez reining AC in either.
@roadslave
Roche said AS was changing rings (which AS now explains he wasn't and it seems to be a freak thing) and hadn't got the right gears to shift rings so the chain went too slack.