We tend to look at cycling through rose-tinted glasses; cycling-specific ones that not only give us a cheery outlook on the past, but ones that conveniently hold big black bars over the bits we prefer not to remember as they were because they don’t fit into the picture we’ve formed in our minds. One of the most interesting things about a community like Velominati is all the different viewpoints that come together regarding events past that help remind us of something approaching reality, built from an aggregation international of views. Perhaps even more interesting is how this experience also brings into sharp relief the evolution of the “facts” as we each have seen them at different points in our lives.
A prime example is of the discussion earlier this week regarding the Lenault battle in 1986. The American view predominantly held was that LeMond was short-changed by Hinault, while the Europeans (or at least the French) could see no reason Hinault should acquiesce the Tour should he be in a position to win it. Certainly not from an American. The Aussies, of course, feel Phil Anderson or, barring that, Phil Ligget or someone else named Phil – regardless of nationality – should have won it, and the Kiwis are no doubt still busy looking for a Tour contender who doesn’t ride a bike. At the time, I hated Hinault and characterized him as a cheating douchenozzle; these days, I regard him as one of the greatest examples of a complete rider and a model of what riders today should aspire to be.
The truth is, of course, somewhere in the middle and after we boil the ocean of the ’86 Tour, we’re left with two great riders on one team who were so closely matched they each could have won that year. But the promises made the year before and the reality of the race situation on the road were like water and oil, and by the time the race reached l’Alpe d’Huez, the team, the fans, and the countries had polarized towards one end or the other, each choosing the side that matched most closely the version of the facts that helped them feel more at ease with their loyalties.
As controversies have a tendency to, they overshadow one of the most unique rides to the top of l’Alpe d’Huez in the history of the great climb. In my memory, Hinault attacked on the descent from either the Col de la Croix de Fer or the Glandon. (Maybe he attacked at the base, as WikiPedia suggests, but I don’t remember it that way.) Only LeMond had an answer, and the teammates escaped together to ride the mythical 21 hairpins together. I can’t think of another time when two G.C. riders – let alone two teammates – outclassed everyone else in the race up this climb.
Up and up they rode together – the Badger in his distinct style and LeMan in his – with only their pain, their massive gears, their rocking shoulders, and their resentment for each other as company. Hand-in-hand they crossed the finish line as happy team mates, LeMond gifting the stage to his patron in the end. But beneath the surface boiled a fearsome rivalry and within minutes Hinault and LeMond’s dashing alter-ego, LeMelvis, traded blows in the press. And with that, the great ride was almost immediately eclipsed by polemics.
In the end, LeMond overcame a tampered-with TT bike to win the Tour and Hinault retired as arguably the most successful Tour de France rider at the time. The record is set but the facts become more malleable with time. The rest we see with our rose-tinted glasses.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
@Markp
Huh, how strange...going through the back catalogue to ease the boredom at work & this Baum gets pointed out in the la Vie Claire convo. Saw it in the flesh yesterday heading up in the Adelaide Hills with the rider getting some proper Rule #9 work in battling cross winds to make a Dutchman proud.
@Oli
This thread got resurrected by @Mikael Liddy and to put off the awful moment of having to start work again on a Monday I took a look through the last page worth of comments and found this picture from @Oli. If I recall its Charly Mottet - it was used in an ad in a cycling mag back in the day and I always thought it was one of the iconic cycling pictures but could never find it on the interweb - this is either because: I'm not as clever as I thought I was on the interweb or; because not many other people thought this picture was the tits.
Anyway - now I've found it I can go back down the mine happy.
@the Engine
Awesome TT that one up Mt.V! It's Jean-François Bernard. Mottet has more of a roundish head and wore Rudy's
@sthilzy
Man, I need to pen a piece about JFB. Great rider who did well but alas had WAY too much pressure to succeed Hinault and Fignon. Loved that Ventoux TT - 100% V the whole way and so focussed he left a huge blob of spittle on his heft leg of his shorts.
@frank
@frank Dredging this back up since the article popped up on the "Recent & Random Articles" feed, LeMond had a separate endorsement with Huffy to race bicycles under their badge when he raced in the United States. I have no doubt that it's truly a Della Santa under the paint (or something similar). Another key is the "Celestial Seasonings" panel in the Mondrian jersey; this is likely during the '85 or '86 Coors Classic. My guess would be the '85 edition of the race. I vaguely remember that 7-11 was on "Huffys" by 1986 and that LeMond rode something else...