As many of you know, I write a monthly column for Cyclist Magazine where I answer Dear Abby-esque questions, and the most recent query pertained to whether I consider the Tour the best race of the year, or whether it’s an over-publicized circus. The question made me realize something about myself: I have a weariness around the Tour de France not unlike a romantic whose heart has been broken one too many times.
The fact is, as much as I prefer a race like Paris-Roubaix or the Giro d’Italia to the mid-summer shit show that is the Tour de France, nothing gets my anticipation going quite the way the Tour does, which is undeniably the pinnacle of the season; all the classifications and stages are prestigious enough that racers of all sorts are all arriving at the start in peak form. There is a promise of hard racing from day one, but the first week consists mostly of me worrying about the big favorites crashing out. As soon as we get through that mess, my heart is usually broken on the first day in the mountains, when the favorite takes a decisive lead and the rest of the race is most about stages than the GC.
At least, these are the dreads of a man who lived through the Indurain and Armstrong eras of racing.
Nevertheless, the Tour always manages to seduce me, and this year is no different. Maybe this year, she won’t be such a cruel lover. And, maybe this year, I won’t make horrible picks in the VSP. Just maybe, just maybe. You know the drill; get your picks in by the time the clock goes to zero, and you get some swap options on the rest day. Good luck!
[vsp_results id=”104413″/]
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
Rule #59 violation is the reason for Sagan's DQ. Bit too harsh I guess.
http://www.velominati.com/the-rules/#59
Remember Cav's silver medal in RIO?
https://youtu.be/869ytxoJsF8
Cav officially out of Tour now according to team tweet:
Unfortunately, @MarkCavendish has been forced to withdraw from #TDF2017.
@ChrisO
Having watched that a couple of times it seems that the point a which Cav starts to exit right, when his body really accelerates to the side is before the elbow. It happens as Sagan's shoulder contacts his head. If Sagan didn't hit him hard how did he suddenly go from upright to bouncing off the barrier. He didn't fling himself off the bike.
Sure seams to me like Cav was making a line where there wasn't going to be one. And the only way he was gonna get thru was to put his head and shoulder in to Sagan (reminds me of stage 1 in UK). Sagan gets bumped to the left and his right elbow's gonna swing out to counter.
So, the tour so far:
1) Stupid stage 1 leaves Movistar shortchanged and main GC contenders at 30 sec disadvantage cause they chose not to bomb around tight turns w/wet road paint on TT bikes.
2) Cav and Sagan out.
3) Barring misfortune the Sky Train could win with either Thomas or Froome.
Too bad the women's Giro isn't being televised.
The whole incedent might have taken 1.5 seconds. Should descisions made by instinct and body movements that are in reaction to very small forces be judged from poor camera angles by people who have no experience of those speeds and situations? The jury may have been too hasty. Not that they don't have experience but they too are probably working with the same camera angles.
I am of the opinion that Cav was too aggressive and got caught out. His leaning into Sags is the start of the chain of events. Why did that happen? Not because of Sags. The elbow may be physics at best or defensive at worst I do not think Sags did I it to get rid of the competition.
An after thought, I like them both - a lot. They both have class and a sense of humor while being fucking pro both on and off the bike. They are friends and know that this is pro racing. My bet is that they will go on as usual. This is just unfortunate for both.
@Rob
terribly so. some of these finishing stretches in grand tours lately are terribly technical. racers are going to race. sprint finishes look great on TV, and there are a LOT more top speed guys in the peloton now than ever before. there are a dozen Abdujaparovs, Cippolinis, and McEwens contesting every finish now. a certain amount of this carnage is inevitable, with things as they are.
Give me a break!!! Cavendish knows the issues with a stage at the end.... Sagan did not throw an elbow or take him out...... I have had more sever bumps in a social recovery ride at my local bike shop on a Saturday AM !!!!!!
Saga has been disqualified.... geeeez....just move on...... If everyone on the tour had the same thing (punishment) dolled out to them for bumps..elbows here and there and several other "SO CALLED" unacceptable behaviors there would be about the riders left in the tour....
FUCKING GROW UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is racing NOT a FUCKING knitting circle!!!!! If you can't handle the bumps, and elbows, cut-offs etc etc ...then get off the M---EFFING BIKE!!!!
In other words SEE RULE NUMBER 5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@Duntov
Did you read as far down as rule 43?
@chris
Yup most of the comments here and on the rest of the 'net do not go far enough back. The elbow was not the issue Sagan came straight across to where Cavendish already had the space and the wheel and rode into him. Maybe a DQ was a bit much but it did put another rider out so on that context it could be called fair. Another thought may be to have a points and time deduction plus a Yellow Card where another Yellow would result in a DQ.